Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Remake of Wickerman - can it be true?

bluestreak said:
i keep seeing the advert on the side of the bus and it makes me sooooo angry.
ditto

It's gunna be shit innit

ffs

It's even his own daughter the cop goes looking for in this one - doesn't bode well for the storyline as we know it huh
 
Well if Nicholas Cage's character isn't a virgin then it's a completely different film. And no doubt a fairly shite one. I'll watch it when it's on the telly though.
 
Last time I looked on BBFC it said TBC so presumed it was being disputed. They must have changed it since then.
 
PacificOcean said:
I haven't acutally seen it TBH, but from the TV ads and cinema trailers, they have made it look like a horror :confused:

No it's not, though the way they are promoting it makes it look like a horror film. It's based on a bed time story Shyamalan made up for his daughter. According to most of the reviews it's neither scary nor very good.
 
Reno said:
No it's not, though the way they are promoting it makes it look like a horror film. It's based on a bed time story Shyamalan made up for his daughter.

Talk about totally mismarketing a film. The posters and TV ads make it look like a horror so parents won't take the kids to see it and horror fans will see it's a PG and not go.

Who are they aiming the film at?
 
PacificOcean said:
Talk about totally mismarketing a film. The posters and TV ads make it look like a horror so parents won't take the kids to see it and horror fans will see it's a PG and not go.

Who are they aiming the film at?

It's only in the UK that they are marketing this as a horror film. In the US it was promoted more as a fairytale/fantasy film. This is probably out of desperation, because in the US the film has already flopped and gotten bad reviews and they are trying to make it look like his more horror orientated (and more financially successful) previous films.

This is the US poster:

2006-7-29-ladywater.jpg


On the UK poster she is just a shadow across a swimming pool and a beasty with red glowing eye is lurking in the bushes.
 
Groucho said:
Has anyone seen this flopping cinematic disaster?

e2a I mean The Wicker Man not the Lady in the Water

I have. In my defense, it was at the $2 theatre, and I was too drunk to drive home. I needed a place to sober up so I wouldn't get arrested driving home.

It was truely awful. Even blind drunk I could see it was bad. I'd have rated it G (for god-awful).
 
Lady in work said today that she watches all horror films, and said that she wants to see the wicker man. I asked her if she had seen the original to which she replied no. Speechless. Have warned her off this one though.
 
i was sure that hollywood ad run out of ideas a long time ago. i guess they just don't want to risk doing something new.
 
Mungy said:
don't want to risk doing something new.

"Something new" hardly ever makes money. Why? Because the vast majority of people won't go and see something they don't recognize. That's why sequels and remakes happen and untill joe public decides to turn out for a small British film like Life and Lyrics in the same numbers as they do for a piece of crap like Pirates of the Carribean 2 then, and only then, Hollywood will change its ways.
 
jodal said:
"Something new" hardly ever makes money. Why? Because the vast majority of people won't go and see something they don't recognize. That's why sequels and remakes happen and untill joe public decides to turn out for a small British film like Life and Lyrics in the same numbers as they do for a piece of crap like Pirates of the Carribean 2 then, and only then, Hollywood will change its ways.

yeah, but loads of people went out for the first 'Pirates of the Carribean'
 
jodal said:
To see Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley.
oh and in its opening weekend Pirates 1 made £3m in the UK whilst pirates 2 in its opening weekend in the UK made £14m. Most people prefer to go see what they know and recognise, they don't like taking a chance.
 
Back
Top Bottom