The UK government dropped the extradition request 8 years ago.That's not a fair question to ask me, because as I suggested earlier, I have a particular view. I think this chap, who still has a jail sentence to complete, should come back home to face the music, and until that is dealt with I don't think the US authorities should give him house room.
I can't see any reference to him having to go back to prison if he returns to the UK - or Ireland, the country he would in fact be deported to.
He is therefore not a 'fugitive' and both the US and UK government are declining to call him a 'terrorist'.
What does this sentence mean? Are you saying that someone who ends up on the wrong side of the law is not entitled to be treated fairly?The public good is that people who seek to defeat the ends of justice shouldn't profit thereby.
If so then your concept of "law" and "justice" is worthless, nonsensical and not worth defending in the first place.
I don't support this guy's previous actions and I don't share his previous politics, but ultimately this has nothing to do with what is fair now. I believe that anyone in his situation should not be deported on such pathetic grounds. He is not being deported on the grounds that he is or was a terrorist, so in fact you are factually wrong.
Seems to me that you are supporting unjust US actions simply because you are vindictive and want to see this guy suffer now because of things he did 25 years ago that you disagreed with.
Also seems to me that you are admitting that you think that the US actions are unjust, and you only support them because of who this guy is. That is not fair or just, and is not based in any law or decent principle at all.
