Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Release Pól Brennan

The last of the levellers were holed up in the Crown when taken, that's the historial significance of it. Whether it's directly by the church wall is of little importance compared to establishing that this is what the article is on about and that alcohol's attempt to rubbish the campaign has backfired and left him looking a bit of a tool.

Certainly not.

Look at the sentence

Corporal Perkins, Private Church and Cornet Thompson are still commemorated each year at the very place where they were murdered by the Crown.

it clearly states that the crown murdered them not that they were murdered at a place called the crown . I think the tool quote bounces back on you.
 
They may not have been murdered by the Crown pub, the article may have got that bit confused due to the historical association with the Crown that i pointed out - that the last hold outs were captured at the Crown. But this is the Crown referred to. (Whether the writers have the exact facts correct is neither here nor there) Further evidence for this interpretation is that all other references to the crown as in 'crown forces' (the interpretation that you're putting on this one) do not have a capital C. This is the only Crown in the article with a capital C, thus signifying it's difference from the other usages. And one more, the march to the church has i past years started from guess where...the Crown.
 
The holes in the church wall, where the execution was said to have taken place, is thought by some to be a bit of a myth.

perhaps even a Pre-Urban Myth:rolleyes::D
 
They may not have been murdered by the Crown pub, the article may have got that bit confused due to the historical association with the Crown that i pointed out - that the last hold outs were captured at the Crown. But this is the Crown referred to. (Whether the writers have the exact facts correct is neither here nor there) Further evidence for this interpretation is that all other references to the crown as in 'crown forces' (the interpretation that you're putting on this one) do not have a capital C. This is the only Crown in the article with a capital C, thus signifying it's difference from the other usages. And one more, the march to the church has i past years started from guess where...the Crown.

it makes no grammattical sense and a pub would be The Crown not the Crown
 
Articles are sometimes not grammatically correct, some thimes they get their facts mixed up and confused - as i believe in the case here. Someone tried to briefly summarise a longer re-telling and made a mess of it.
 
it makes no grammattical sense and a pub would be The Crown not the Crown
Have'nt you got anything better to critisise movements such as TOM, than semantics around grammer and spelling and/or the minutest possibility that they mis-used Crown, instead of say sovereign?:rolleyes::hmm::p
 
Articles are sometimes not grammatically correct, some thimes they get their facts mixed up and confused - as i believe in the case here. Someone tried to briefly summarise a longer re-telling and made a mess of it.

so you have changed your tune -previously it was me that was wrong and my 'campaign' had 'backfired' and now your TOM writer has fucked up his own 'retelling' of a story of English heroes against tyranny.

There are many reasons to criticise TOM and that was one of them.TOM seem to want a return to adversarial sectarian politics and worship violent men. We have seen Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisly cooperate together to build NI even to a point where they tell jokes .TOM wants us to move back to the dark ages of sectarian strife.

Very dangerous people.
 
No, there's no change of tune.; You are still wrong. The article writer also managed to mangle the history.

Have i said a single thing in support of the people behind the TOM? Or that i support a return to violence in northern Ireland. No. So i can do without the lecture then old boy.
 
Yes the writer mangled history

Are you saying "butchers apron" is not a republican Irish reference to the Flag of the UK ?

Now whilst I support the break up of the UK into its constituent parts and return of the NI province to the irish mainland (politically) your name seems indicative of one is defines themselves by republican invective.
 
I suggest you do a search of posts for my attitude to republicanism or nationalism before digging yourself another hole. Or at the very least don't make assumptions.
 
so you have changed your tune -previously it was me that was wrong and my 'campaign' had 'backfired' and now your TOM writer has fucked up his own 'retelling' of a story of English heroes against tyranny.

There are many reasons to criticise TOM and that was one of them.TOM seem to want a return to adversarial sectarian politics and worship violent men. We have seen Martin McGuinness and Ian Paisly cooperate together to build NI even to a point where they tell jokes .TOM wants us to move back to the dark ages of sectarian strife.

Very dangerous people.

I would have thought that the complete opposite is true by their activities over the last decade or so since the GFA; wholeheartedly supporting the peace proceess, and moving towards programmes of peace and reconciliation, you would be hard pushed to find anything written by them supporting a return to the Armed Struggle or mass inssurection. The vast
majority of TOM members follow Sinn Feinn line.
 
I would have thought that the complete opposite is true by their activities over the last decade or so since the GFA; wholeheartedly supporting the peace proceess, and moving towards programmes of peace and reconciliation, you would be hard pushed to find anything written by them supporting a return to the Armed Struggle or mass inssurection. The vast
majority of TOM members follow Sinn Feinn line.

So why not dump all the nationalist myth crap and the glorification of violence and camapaigns on behalf of murderous thugs.

I support teh unification of NI with the republic .To do so you are going to have to win the confidence of the Protestant people of Northern Ireland and you aren't going to do that by endless whining about past grievances and supporting ex terrororists.

I long for the day when Orange Flute Bands and their green equivalents are long gone and the only remnants are' sealed knot 'type reenactors of 1690
 
RUC bugged Rosemary Nelson’s home for three years
Belfast Telegraph 30/09/08

The security forces bugged a house belonging to solicitor Rosemary Nelson and wanted to tap her office phone, the inquiry into her murder has learned.

The inquiry revealed RUC Special Branch were recording the “minutiae of her life” for almost three years before Mrs Nelson was murdered by a car bomb.

The inquiry, which resumed hearings this month, is expected to explore whether RUC Special Branch respected the legally privileged talks she had with her client.

The then Secretary of State Mo Mowlam approved the operation to bug the home owned by Mrs Nelson — and occupied by suspected IRA leader Colin Duffy — but there is no paper trail to show what happened to a second application to eavesdrop on her office.

The inquiry's leading lawyer says the lack of a paper trail suggests the wiretap did not take place. However, another intelligence report gives details of a conversation Mrs Nelson had with Martin McGuinness in her office, several months before the RUC application to tap her phone.

The Committee on the Administration of Justice — Mrs Nelson served on its executive committee — indicated it was concerned about the revelations.

“We are opposed to any breach of lawyer-client confidentiality arrangements,” said CAJ director Mike Ritchie.

Special Branch was interested in Mrs Nelson because she represented republican suspects and the Garvaghy Road Residents' Coalition in the Drumcree dispute.

The inquiry is beginning to explore intelligence questions around Mrs Nelson's murder in March 1999, and has noted the absence of a police file on her — in spite of a number of intelligence reports devoted to her movements and associations.

Rory Phillips QC, lead counsel for the inquiry, said that from April 1996 Special Branch began collecting intelligence “specifically relating to” Mrs Nelson.

“The volume and the detail of the reporting gives rise to a series of questions. Why was Special Branch recording information of this kind relating to Rosemary Nelson's private life, including details of her family, friends, people who worked in her solicitor's office?”

Given “this intense focus”, Mr Phillips said, the question arose as to whether “there was in fact a file on Rosemary Nelson in existence at the time of her murder?”

The intelligence materials suggest police were collecting intelligence on Mrs Nelson but not apparently analysing it.

Mr Phillips said there are no “reports, notes, memoranda or documents produced by E3 (Special Branch's republican desk) containing analysis of the intelligence on Rosemary Nelson”.

The inquiry has found two bugging applications relating to Mrs Nelson.

One concerned Operation Indus, the plan to bug the house in Deeny Drive, Lurgan, then occupied by Mr Duffy and owned by Mrs Nelson. An earlier application to tap her office phone was also made by an RUC Special Branch sergeant in Lurgan.
 
SENIOR REPUBLICAN TO ADDRESS LIVERPOOL RALLY



RE. 11TH ANNUAL JAMES LARKIN MARCH & RALLY - LIVERPOOL



Details of this years March & Rally in rememberence of the great Liverpool Irish Socialist and Trade Union Leader have been announced.



Now in its 11th year, this year's event will be held on SATURDAY 11TH OCTOBER 2008 assembling 12 noon at Mount Pleasant, LIVERPOOL and then following a route through Liverpool City Centre to an open air rally.



This year's rally will be addressed by Senior Republican and former political prisoner Sean Murray of Sinn Fein who will outline the current case for Irish Unity and the need for the Irish community in England to back the current peace process and ensure that the need for a United Ireland is widely understood.



A spokeperson for the organisers of the event, the James larkin Society, states "The James Larkin March & Rally has become the largest supported Republican/Left demonstration in England which attracts Republican Flute Bands from Ireland, Scotland and England and hundreds of supporters from throughout England, Scotland and Wales.Previous marches have highlighted the need to commemorate the 1981 Irish Hunger Strikes, protesting against racism and the need to confront facism and the right wing in this country. It is right that James Larkin is remembered this way and the Irish community in Liverpool can be rightly proud of its famous son. As always, the march will be led by the Liverpool-based James larkin Republican Flute Band".
 
I am a total supporter of the break up of the UK. The sooner England can leave the Northern Irish to determine their own future the better.
If they want to join with the Republic that's up to them and none if England business. The Loyalists can then spend their time convincing the bigots on the west coast of Scotland to support their cause at Rangers matches.

TomPaine
 
Previous marches have highlighted the need to commemorate the 1981 Irish Hunger Strikes, protesting against racism and the need to confront facism and the right wing in this country

Ironic considering some of the racist bile I am heard coming from Republicans as well as Loyalists.

TomPaine
 
The point however is that the Republican movement within the Nationalist Community and outside, not only in word, but deed(for instance when the Chinese community within West Belfast were under a spate of abuse, Sinn Feinn members actively helped out in limiting this, with at least one member working in Chinese Restuarant) act against bigotry.

Arguably Unionists(I won't even bother mentioning loyalists), fall very short of this within Protestant areas and beyond.
 
This should not necessarily be the case.
For instance in Derry, on the Waterside area of the River, along with the Protestant ethic of Religous Freedom you have everythng from Mosques, Gudwaras, Synagogues, etc.
However most people socialise on the City side.

Talking to a prominant member of Socialist Democracy(loosely linked to USFI) not so long ago, he commented on this regarding Ervine's attitude before he died around attacks on Asian Shops in his district. Seemed to be saying that although rhetorically condemning this, in practice did nothing(or could do nothing) to stop this.

Although as will rightly be pointed out this is something of a generalisation.
 
A report in The Irish News (September 16) proves once again that unionists really do have some gall. Nelson McCausland and Gregory Campbell – both of the DUP – want to bring the GAA to task because some GAA clubs have apparently allowed their facilities to be used to commemorate deceased members of the IRA.

I have no quarrel with their complaint as such but unionists should begin by getting their own house in order before pointing the finger at others.

Most unionist politicians are proud members of the Orange Order and this self-appointed stout defender of the reformed faith has been host to men of violence for years if not decades.

Every year lodges affiliated to the Orange Order lay wreaths and up to 40 bands take part in commemorating Brian Robinson – a loyalist killer and LOL member shot dead by an army undercover unit minutes after he had murdered a Catholic.

Anyone who has read that excellent book The Orange Order – A Tradition Betrayed by the Rev. Brian Kennaway, a Presbyterian minister and himself an Orange member for 40 years until he resigned out of principle, will see what a deplorable state the order is in.

When you read that book and look at the photographs you will see convicted criminals and murderers wearing Orange regalia at Orange gatherings.

In The Irish News (June 19 2006) that very same Rev Kennaway is quoted as saying: “I am further alarmed when I look at the membership and see among the membership of the institution convicted murderers, fraudsters, and criminals of all descriptions who have never been suspended by the institution.’’

Strong stuff indeed, especially as it comes from one of their own.

Newcastle Reader, Co Down
 
Delivered by Paul Little IRSP, Ard Comhairle

Forty years ago Civil Rights activists embarked on a campaign for
civil rights with a demonstration in Derry. The Civil Rights campaign
was both legitimate and peaceful, it was met with brutal violence
from the state in an attempt to suppress legitimate protest. The
Stormont regime of 1968 showed both contempt and a brutality against
a section of the Irish working class never before witnessed by TV
audiences across the world. The Stormont bubble had burst, the nature
of the British occupation and Unionism had finally been exposed to a
global audience, nothing would ever be the same again.

Today in 2008, we find ourselves back on the streets, again demanding
civil rights and equality. Our demands today are every bit as
legitimate as our predecessors in the NICRA in 1968, then it was one
man, one vote today it is one family one house.

We commend the North Belfast Civil Rights Association for organising
today's demonstration and all who are taking part. There are a broad
range of republican and socialist speakers here today and whilst we
differ on many things politically it is important on the housing
issue in north Belfast we stay together, engaging in different
strategies, that complement each other, but united, on the singular
aim of achieving an end to discrimination in housing in north
Belfast. Some may comment on the lack of a contribution from within
the Protestant, Unionist, loyalist community to today's demonstra-
tion, and the NBCRA did discuss this issue. On this occasion it was
decided that even if P.U.L. representatives did take up an invitation
from the organisers, it would be hypocritical to ask them to speak as
they have refused to speak to any nationalist, republican or
socialist community representatives on the issue of housing discrim-
ination in north Belfast over the past 15 years.

We in the IRSP recognise that there are progressive voices within
working class unionism, but, the fact is that on this particular
issue, housing discrimination in north Belfast, the P.U.L. community
representatives have failed to step up to the mark, need not creed,
need not greed, that is our mantra. Today, again we ask the question?
Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist, Socialist, Republican and nationalist
these are the designations that identify our ideologies and our
differences. The IRSP recognise and support the diverse nature of the
population, it is diversity that what makes us what we collectively,
what we are.

However, regardless of our diversity, we have a common bond, our
class, the working class! We represent by far the largest section of
our society. It is on this basis that we ask the P.U.L. community
representatives to engage in open and honest dialogue on housing
stress in north Belfast. We state here today that, clearly, no
section of the working class can improve civil rights by the denial
of those same civil rights to another section of the working class.
Working together as the largest section of our society, the working
class can deliver universal civil rights for all.

For many years Housing activists across north Belfast have campaigned
against housing discrimination, housing stress and housing poverty,
this has often been a difficult and thankless task continually
frustrated by statutory agencies such as the Housing Executive and
latterly by private developers and housing associations.

Housing stress leaves the most vulnerable in our society,, young
people, the low paid, unemployed, and single parents prey, to
exploitation by private landlords and property developers. The IRSP
are totally opposed to the Shylock practice of hiking up rents to
£25 - £30 per week above the amount of rent allowed through housing
benefit. This act alone by unscrupulous landlords plunges many
families into poverty. We support the call for rent capping of
landlords whose tenants are in receipt of housing benefit.

Housing discrimination and housing stress have long plagued working
class areas in north Belfast and all attempts by political and
community activists at focusing those charged with social rented
housing provision on the problem of the shortage of such houses has
proven futile. With 83% of people currently waiting to be housed from
NIHE housing waiting list coming from the nationalist community it is
clear that there is no strategy for alleviating housing stress, save
the option of high rise flats.

The IRSP is totally opposed to high-rise family accommodation, High
Rise flats have been proven to detrimental to family living and
seriously diminish the quality of life for families. Veteran housing
activists who campaigned successfully for the demolition of both
Divis Flats and Unity Flats are involved in the organising and in
support of the March for Houses. Those activists along with others
are determined that the mistakes of the past are not repeated now or
in the future.

The IRSP demands that there is a sufficient supply of good quality,
rent controlled, social housing.

NEED NOT CREED, NEED NOT GREED, ONE FAMILY ONE HOUSE
 
Rosemary Nelson Inquiry

Police seek right to question witnesses
The Irish News 17/10/08

A High Court judge has been urged to allow PSNI lawyers to question nine witnesses at the inquiry into solicitor Rosemary Nelson’s murder. The force is also seeking a ruling that any criminal records they have should be considered by the tribunal as part of a test on their credibility. The nine witnesses have made allegations about police threats or intimidation directed against Mrs Nelson before she was killed in a loyalist bomb attack.

Earlier this year the inquiry, which was set up to examine claims of security force collusion, refused to allow any cross-examination by counsel for the PSNI. It stressed that the proceedings were an inquisitorial – rather than adversarial – process aimed at establishing the truth.

But John Larkin, lawyer for the PSNI, warned of the potential consequences for the officers if the claims made against them were backed by the tribunal. Opening an application for a judicial review of the refusal to cross-examine, he said: “In many ways the allegations are of the most serious imaginable in respect of any person and certainly police officers. Instead of being involved in the proper investigation of crime they were involved in threatening an officer of the court in discharging her duties. A finding of fact by the inquiry, if made, would obviously have a very serious impact on the reputation of those individuals.”

Mrs Nelson (40) died after a booby-trap bomb exploded under her car in Lurgan, Co Armagh, in March 1999.

Retired judge Sir Michael Morland is chairing a three-strong panel which must determine whether the then RUC, Northern Ireland Office, British army or other state agency facilitated the murder or blocked attempts to investigate it.

According to Mr Larkin, however, concerns that witnesses may be deterred from assisting the inquiry if police lawyers were allowed to question them were “utterly irrelevant to the issue of whether or not criminal convictions should be taken into account in the credibility evaluation”.

The barrister told Lord Justice Girvan, who is expected to reserve judgment in the case: “A witness who says ‘I’m not coming along if there’s going to be unpleasant questions about my past’ is a witness who the inquiry ought to be very circumspect about. If there’s a witness who has a significant criminal record or even a minor criminal record which casts doubt on their credibility... the person who is bound to make determinations must have regard to issues which bend on the believability of that person.”

James Eadie, lawyer for the inquiry, claimed there was a real risk of harming its work by granting the police application half-way through the tribunal. He said the allegations of unfairness were not due to being shut out of the process or any lack of probing controversial evidence but just because the inquiry was not allowing counsel for the PSNI to ask the questions.

“The assertion by my learned friend is that there is a duty on the tribunal or the Inquiry panel to do that which it judges is likely to harm the efficient and effective carrying out of its task. That’s what it comes down to,” Mr Eadie said.
 
Aidan Mc Anespie – Accidental Shooting “Most Unlikely”



Press statement - Contact the Pat Finucane Centre for further info-07989 323418

Family Welcome Findings of HET Focussed Investigation

The family of Aidan Mc Anespie who was shot and fatally wounded by a British soldier in 1988 have issued the following statement through the Pat Finucane Centre.
Speaking at the weekend Una Mc Anespie, niece of the victim said,
“Within the last week we have had a further meeting with the Historical Enquiries Team as a follow-up to the interim report which we received earlier this year. That interim report described the officially accepted version of the incident, that the weapon discharge that led to the death of Aidan had been accidental and random, as the “… least likely” explanation.
As agreed we have now been provided with a full resolution report which is the result of the focussed investigation. This report, in our view, is a devastating rebuttal of the British Army version of events and represents the closest that we as a family have got to the truth of what occurred that day.”
The HET considered three scenarios;
1) Guardsman Holden accidentally discharged the gun in the manner described by him in his statements or in some other unknown and undisclosed circumstances.
2) Guardsman Holden deliberately discharged a burst of aimed shots at the victim or his vicinity.
3) Guardsman Holden was tracking the victim with the gun, or was aiming the gun at him, and being unaware that the gun was cocked and ready to fire, inadvertently discharging the three shots.
In respect of the ‘accidental discharge’ theory, the first scenario, the report concluded,
‘When the facts that the victim of this alleged random shot was a subject that the soldiers kept under observation, and was perceived by them as a potential terrorist suspect, are added to the equation, then the likelihood that it was a random shot is even less. Add to this the minimum 9lb pressure required to pull the trigger and the probability of ‘accidental firing’ recedes further.’
(see unedited HET Conclusions below)
The HET report continued,
“Having weighed up these propositions and taken all the circumstances into account, none of the three scenarios outlined above can be definitively ruled out; Guardsman Holden’s version of events, however, can be considered to be the least likely.”
In respect of the fatal shot the HET concluded,
‘…the chances of it being un-aimed or random seem so remote in the circumstances that they can be virtually disregarded.’
In response Una Mc Anespie said,
“As a family we feel that a huge burden has been lifted as a result of these latest findings. The claim that Aidan was killed by a ricochet bullet fired at random because a soldier had wet slippy fingers which inadvertently came in contact with the trigger and that Aidan was not being tracked at that precise moment has been firmly rebutted. The official scenario, as accepted by the British Army and the prosecution service, can be regarded as so ‘remote’ that it can be ‘virtually disregarded’.

This investigation examined the circumstances in the context of the harassment that Aidan suffered and Guardsman Holden’s perception of Aidan as the ‘enemy’. The official explanation of the events of Sunday February 21 1988 have been deconstructed in their entirety. My mother, Elish, fought for 20 years to have the truth told. It was a great comfort to her to receive the interim report before she died earlier this summer. These latest findings are a lasting tribute to her efforts and a vindication of our beloved son, brother and uncle Aidan.
 
Pressure increases for Finucane inquiry
The Irish Times 21/10/08

Britain is coming under continuing US pressure to grant a fully independent inquiry into the murder of a prominent Northern Ireland lawyer, his family claimed today. Security force collusion in the 1989 murder of solicitor Pat Finucane will be raised by his youngest son John at a high profile human rights event in the US this week.

The organisation Human Rights First will celebrate its 30th anniversary at a gala dinner in New York on Thursday where Hollywood star Sigourney Weaver will introduce the 28-year-old Mr Finucane as a guest speaker.

Pat Finucane was shot dead in his Belfast home in front of his wife and children by loyalist gunmen in February 1989, but security force collusion in the killing has fuelled long-standing calls for a public inquiry to establish the full truth.

“It is an honour to be invited by Human Rights First to celebrate 30 years of their work in defending and promoting human rights worldwide,” said John Finucane, “My family knows only too well how important the support of such a distinguished international organisation can be in the pursuit of justice.”

The British government already asked retired Canadian judge Peter Cory to review the case along with other controversial killings and he recommend a public inquiry into the Finucane case. But the Finucane family has rejected plans to hold an inquiry under new legislation that relatives insist would allow government ministers to frustrate the search for truth.

John Finucane, who himself qualified as a solicitor this year, said his invitation to tell the star-studded event about his family’s campaign was confirmation of the continuing US interest in the case.

Human Rights First has worked internationally and has compiled reports on events in Northern Ireland. The group has also reported on claims that security forces helped kill Mr Finucane because he represented republican suspects in court cases at the height of the Troubles.

Thursday’s celebration will see the organisation pay special tribute to Senator Edward Kennedy for his lifetime contribution to human rights. The event comes after presidential candidate Barack Obama backed the Finucane family’s calls for a full inquiry. Mr Finucane said:

“Human Rights First has undertaken several investigations into human rights abuses in Northern Ireland since their first visit in 1992 and has provided invaluable support and assistance to the victims of human rights abuses in Northern Ireland for over 15 years. Human Rights First has consistently backed my family’s call on the British government to establish a fully independent, international public inquiry, initial concerns having been raised in their first report, Human Rights and Legal Defence, published in 1993. Since then, Human Rights First has endorsed fully the recommendations of Judge Peter Cory and has heavily criticised the restrictive provisions of the Inquiries Act 2005.”

He welcomed his invitation to the US event and said:

“Coming so soon after Senator Obama’s recent endorsement of my family’s position, it is encouraging to note that the US political arena and international human rights community continue to realise that an independent inquiry is an urgent necessity. Britain must face up to its involvement in and responsibility for the conflict in Ireland.”





Troops Out Movement

Campaigning for British Withdrawal from Ireland

PO Box 1032 Birmingham B12 8BZ Tel: 0121 773 8683 0r 0797 017 4167

[email protected] www.troopsoutmovement.com
 
Morrison trial is another case of British dirty tricks
Andersonstown News 28/10/08

Editorial

The case of Danny Morrison, and the seven others wrongly convicted for the ‘abduction’ of IRA informant Sandy Lynch is proof, if proof was ever needed, that the British government waged a dirty war in Ireland.

At the time of his arrest in January 1990 Morrison was a thorn in the side of the establishment. Articulate and progressive, his words and thoughts were influencing a new generation of republicans. Because of that Whitehall wanted him off the scene – either in a grave or in a jail. In the end it devised a complex plan involving a network of informants that would lead to Morrison’s arrest in a house in Lenadoon. (Estate in West Belfast)

Sandy Lynch was kidnapped by the IRA which had become suspicious he was an informant. Among his captors was Freddie Scappaticci – a man Morrison believes was another high-level informant working inside the organisation. The Special Branch knew Lynch was to be abducted. It had the Lenadoon house he was held at under surveillance for two days. Yet it made absolutely no effort to rescue its agent until Morrison arrived at the house and Scappaticci had said his goodbyes.

Morrison says he only went to the house after being told Lynch was prepared to conduct a press conference at which he would admit to being an agent. He is convinced he was set up – something of which now there can be precious little doubt. Morrison ended up spending more than five years behind bars after being convicted of aiding and abetting false imprisonment.

Given the fact he was convicted in open court amid a fanfare of publicity he is fully entitled to know the reasons as to why his conviction has been overturned.

But why is the Public Prosecution Service staying silent? If it is to protect Scappaticci, as everyone suspects, it is merely giving a new lease of the life to a dirty war in Ireland that everyone had hoped was in its death throes.

Support Danny in his demand to be given the reasons for the quashing of his conviction

Shaun Woodward Secretary of state for Northern Ireland at [email protected]

Tel:020 7219 2680 Fax:020 7219 0979
 
I believe the Royal Irish march is divisive and sectarian
Belfast Telegraph 27/10/08

Mark Thompson director of Relatives for Justice

In England there was a self imposed moratorium by the British Army on homecoming parades because of anti-war protests.

In Ireland the British Army is responsible for the use of lethal force, shoot-to-kill, the use of rubber and plastic bullets, collusion, internment and torture — all with official impunity.

In Belfast we do not have to look to Iraq or Afghanistan. We have Ballymurphy, Springhill, and New Lodge massacres among a litany of events that claimed several hundred lives across the city yet there is to be a march in Belfast. This defies all logic, given the last 40 years, including this past decade seeking to move beyond conflict — unless the objective is otherwise.

If we are real about having a shared future with genuine respect for the views of all citizens, then unionists need to reflect upon the real implications of what this march means beyond political point scoring, given the legacy of unresolved hurt. The irony — the clear contradiction and double standard — is that it was the same unionists who sponsored this motion who reacted most when Casement Park was used to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the hunger strike — an event in the heart of west Belfast that in no way infringed upon unionists, civic space or used ratepayers’ money.

This is not to deny that there exists a section of unionism that is genuine in their views concerning this event. Rather, it is the intention of a significant element that is more about the domination of nationalists, at the heart of which lies a campaign to thwart equality and rights in which extremism is intertwined and indistinguishable from.

A cabal of unionists, the same people who, on a regular basis, ridicule, belittle and undermine our Irish identity, culture and language, now want to parade through our city the British Army that unsuccessfully sought to subjugate us, killing our loved ones in the process. For them the primary objective is not about celebration but rather a guise for the continued attempt to humiliate. This is totally unacceptable.

Unionists need to fully understand the level of hurt and pain inflicted within the nationalist and republican community at the hands of the British Army which resonates deeply if they are to appreciate the import of this event. For the majority of Belfast citizens, and those bereaved by the British Army, the parade is crass and offensive. Is this the message unionism really wants to promote?

For example, would it be acceptable to unionists for former republican prisoners to march through the city centre, never mind receive a civic reception?

This issue goes to the heart of the truth about our past and the role the British Army played as we inclusively seek a way to address the actions of all actors to the conflict. The march is divisive and sectarian and will attract hangers-on who simply want to cheerlead in a triumphalist way. Those shops promoting loyalist paramilitary regalia across Belfast which during early summer were selling the Irish tricolour to be burned at Twelfth bonfires are now selling Royal Irish Regiment (RIR) welcome home union flags.

The relationship in particular between this regiment of the British Army, loyalist paramilitarism, collusion, sectarianism and criminality are well documented, which make this all the more unacceptable for the majority of citizens within Belfast who look on in horror at the antics of unionists in both putting forward this motion and those who supported it.

If it is the intention of those who sponsored the motion to maintain division and prevent change then they may succeed. If it is the will of those who genuinely want to foster better relations and understanding then they can find a better way of marking this event which is not contentious or provocative. The choice is theirs. They can put forward a motion suspending the parade and create a space where we can have positive dialogue about what is acceptable and unacceptable in celebrating such events. And which can contribute towards better understanding, assisting in dealing with our past constructively, and in creating a united city. However, they need to demonstrate leadership.

Last week the RUC George Cross Foundation held a service at St Anne’s Cathedral. This was a dignified and fitting event for all those involved without controversy and one which the overwhelming majority of citizens across the city would have no objection to. Surely this is the type of event those who genuinely want to celebrate the return of the RIR can participate in without provocation and to which others, especially those affected by the actions of the British Army, are not insulted or their views made irrelevant.

Unionists, particularly the Alliance Party, need to reflect and weigh up the overall view and not the failed agendas of sectarian politics at Halla na Cathair (City Hall).

Mark Thompson is director of Relatives for Justice = Relatives for Justice is a Belfast based support group working with and providing support to relatives of people bereaved, and injured, by the conflict across the North of Ireland including border regions in the 26 counties. See link on TOM website below.

Please express your total opposition to the march

to Shaun Woodward Secretary of state for Northern Ireland at [email protected]

Tel:020 7219 2680 Fax:020 7219 0979

And/or at http://www.nio.gov.uk/index/contact-us/enquiry-form.htm

NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE 11 Millbank, London SW1P 4PN

NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE Block B Castle Buildings Stormont Estate Belfast BT4 3SG

Tel: (028) 9052 0700 Textphone: (028) 9052 7668

And Bob Ainsworth MP Minister of State for the Armed Forces at [email protected]

Tel:020 7219 4047 Fax:020 7219 2889
 
Republican Socialist Convention

Republican Socialist Convention
Speakers from Scotland, Ireland, Wales and England

November 29th and 30th, 2008
11.00- 17.00 pm
Out of the Blue
36, Dalmeny Street
Edinburgh

Speakers confirmed
Scotland - Scottish Socialist Party
Ireland - Fourthwrite, Irish Socialist Network
England - Socialist Resistance

Speaker to be confirmed
Wales - Member of former Welsh Socialist Alliance

Provisional Agenda

These speakers will lead off Introductory and Concluding
Session, outlining struggles in their particular countries and the scope for
joint work.

The Introductory Session will be followed by Questions and
Contributions.

This will be followed by Workshops on a variety of topics.
There will be a Plenary Report back before the Concluding
Session.
Cost £10 waged, £5 low-waged, £2 unwaged.

Last Updated ( Monday, 20 October 2008 11:58 )

SSP conference motion on the convention
Written by Eddie Truman
Saturday, 27 September 2008 15:04
SSP CONFERENCE POLICY

i) Motion passed

The SSP agrees to contact socialists in England, Ireland
and Wales to discuss a republican socialist strategy to counter current US
and British plans to maintain imperial control over these islands on behalf
of the global corporations. If the initial discussions prove fruitful then
the SSP should, if possible, organise a conference in 2008 to bring together
socialists from across the UK and Ireland.

Last Updated ( Saturday, 27 September 2008 15:06 )
Read more: SSP conference motion on the convention
About the Republican Socialist Convention
Written by Bill Bonnar
Saturday, 27 September 2008 14:54

Saturday November 30th this year sees the 85th anniversary
of the death of the great Scottish socialist and republican; John McLean. It
is therefore fitting that the SSP choose that day to organise a major
conference on Republicanism in Britain.

The struggle for the establishment of an independent
Socialist Republic is at the heart of the SSP's programme for Scotland, but
what will this new Republic look like and what are the implications for the
rest of the Left in Britain?

he John MacLean March

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=61etFdGpXq8&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dURHX6GgYmM
 
er there isn't any moratorium on welcoming home parades for troops in fact they have been on the news.
prods catholics and even people from the south all serve quite happily in the Royal Irish Regiment must drive SF mad.
but I guess gerry has a beard so it pro taliban:)
 
er there isn't any moratorium on welcoming home parades for troops in fact they have been on the news.
prods catholics and even people from the south all serve quite happily in the Royal Irish Regiment must drive SF mad.
but I guess gerry has a beard so it pro taliban:)
I'm sure you can say the same of the Black & Tans:rolleyes::confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom