I agree. It's time these two clowns exited the political scene altogether.
I'm sure many people are now thoroughly sick and tired of this silly pair's third-rate Laurel & Hardy act.
As its said that they are never alone with political schizophrenia, would you settle for three of them leaving ?
A vote could be taken amongst all other political groups on which one is to remain.
''Workers Liberty'' are taking liberties already, they must be falling about with extreme palpatating 'chuckling'.
Quote from Workers Liberty site >>>
Now, speculating on the whys and wherefores of the internal machinations of the SWP may seem like a sectarian occupation. But when the chairs are shuffled in this way and when the occupants of the chairs are 'leading members' of the largest 'revolutionary' organisation in the UK, other socialists should take note.
How can any with a serious face describe them as ''revolutionary', a push bike wheel is more revolutionary than the 'SWP'.
From WL's site -- taken from socialistunity.com >>>
The “Left Alternative” is the brand name of the SWP dominated part of Respect that split away from George Galloway, Salma Yaqoob and most of the councillors last year.
''''Since then the Left Alternative has fared disastrously. Gaining just 0.68% across London in the mayoral election in May, since then one of their councillors has joined the Conservatives, three have joined the Labour Party, and one of their GLA list candidates has joined the Lib Dems.'''
How backwards can they be, by any standards that's a description of reactionaries.
From WL's site taken from socialistunity.com>>>
At every throw of the dice the personal prestige of John Rees was prioritised over either the interests of the movement, or indeed even the interests of the SWP
It get worse, what 'personal' prestige would John Rees have, certainly none of his own, so who did this 'prestige' belong to, who was the 'person ?
From WL's site taken from socialistunity.com>>>
This is excellent news. There are very many capable and principled socialists within the SWP, many of whom have real achievements to their credit in the workers movement.
To put forward that there are many 'principled socialists' in the SWP is a contradiction in brain matter, which will only result in political lunacy. If any had 'principles' they would never have joined the SWP in the first place.
Only the most politically confused could consider them to be socialists.
Statements like that display a profound distortion in the analysis, or even the abilities for analysis by 'socialistunity', a dark shadow has been cast over them by themselves.
If they cannot define ''what is a socialist'' then one can wonder as to what their own members really are.
Silly to say the least and the road to political suicide, must be catching.