yes, enthusiasm is bad.indeed , ive never ever, seen him get soo excited about a game.......
yes, enthusiasm is bad.indeed , ive never ever, seen him get soo excited about a game.......
I wrote that message, yes. I thought that was clear given that my username is attached to it. No wonder you don't like graphics if your eyesight is that bad.Seriously did you help develop this shite?
yes, enthusiasm is bad.

I wrote that message, yes. I thought that was clear given that my username is attached to it. No wonder you don't like graphics if your eyesight is that bad.

fortunately your opinion is in the minority vis a vis Red Faction.well in general we do not talk of developing an internet post, infact considering the context of being on a thread about a video game of which you are particularly defensive despite the fact it's medicore at best, even a half wit would have grasped that the developing was referring to the development of the actual game.
Considering the main argument in favour of it comes from someone who doesn't rate a proper game like Fallout 3 and who enjoys the 'simplistic' controls, I'd suggest this game is one that appeals to a certain "special" demographic.

I was playing videogames before you were born kiddo. Fallout 3 may well have excellent game design - something I made a point of saying, I just happen to like something a little bit more immediate.
As for a sandbox title like Fallout being 'proper'...what a load of cock quite frankly. Unless of course the only definition of 'proper' game is what effectively amounts to a revision of old style text adventure gaming, with vast piles of not-very-well-written dialogue and quite frankly tedious interaction with NPCs in order to get the backstory out, then yeah it's a proper game. For my money FFVII on the PS1 had more 'grab', introduced you to the control system a lot quicker and was more engaging.
But hey, you keep your somewhat limiting defintion of what a proper game is going.
