danny la rouge
Ninja swords for all disabled people
Lol :d:d
Anything from the 7 days. Absolute fucking geniusIn a genuine attempt to get a grounding in his music (mainly cos I'd love to go see the Sinfonietta play Klang in Nov but I'm not going until I 'get' his style) I have dled a load of Stockhausen:
tierkreis
a variety mix
Klang 2
Stimmung
However, I appear to have jumped with both feet in at the deep end! Anyone got any 'easier' Karlheinz they can recommend?
If it's Berg's "Lyric Suite", then I'd enjoy the music too much to want to hurt people.![]()
Speaking as someone who has worked with young people and students, trust me, they really need a few pointers on how to listen, otherwise you're not giving them a fair chance on sound and certain musics. I'm not talking about a cattle prod approach here either and musical education was never important. We all need a chance to unbung our ears!People don't need to learn to listen properly. People have tastes, and when they hear something new they need a cultural reference point for what they're hearing. That's everyone, not just 'musically uneducated' people.
<I'm going too far now, aren't I?>
)Alban Berg is fantastic. It's well worth getting to know more than Wozzeck (which, in my opinion, gets too much attention).I'll have to listen to it. The only thing by Berg I'm familiar with is Wozzeck.
Alban Berg is fantastic. It's well worth getting to know more than Wozzeck (which, in my opinion, gets too much attention).
People tend (IMHO) to go for his operas (and operas in general) because they're "immediate". If you follow the story, they you can feel where the music is going, what it's communicating, rather than, as with the Lyric Suite perhaps, having to surrender yourself to a very sensual piece of music.

Speaking as someone who has worked with young people and students, trust me, they really need a few pointers on how to listen, otherwise you're not giving them a fair chance on sound and certain musics. I'm not talking about a cattle prod approach here either and musical education was never important. We all need a chance to unbung our ears!
One of the most important things I learnt as a student was 'how' to listen. That has stayed with me throughout my life.
(I think we're discussing different things here anyway)
I'd agree with this. When I took a music survey course in university, I entered as a teenager whose tastes stretched all the way from Deep Purple to Jimi Hendrix.
The test at the end of the course was 'drop the needle'. The prof would drop the needle on to one the dozens of compositions we'd studied during the year, for a few seconds. We'd have to identify the piece, the composer, the movement, etc. That meant studying by listening to it all, over and over, till it was committed to memory.
For awhile afterwards, I hated those pieces, but as time went by, I found that I'd developed an appreciation for the music that made me branch out past what we'd studied.
Without learning about the music, I doubt I'd have stumbled upon it on my own.

It also helps you appreciate the differences between different interpretations of pieces by the conductors.
For my part, although Webern might not have reached the heights he did without his teacher's profound influence (Webern did after all start writing in a romantic style - although even his early stuff is rather magical - try Im Sommerwind for example) he (Webern) is on a different place of genius from Schoenberg. The five pieces for orchestra (and the six pieces too), and the opus 21 Symphony, for instance, are unmatched I think for sheer inspiration by anything by Schoenberg - although I'd be very happy to be corrected - point me at the best of Schoenberg, please
I'm not very knowledgable about him.
A good starting point would be Robert Craft's "Schoeberg: Five Orchestral Pieces", on Naxos.point me at the best of Schoenberg, pleaseI'm not very knowledgable about him.
Mind you, IIRC Webern's Passacaglia (beautiful though it is) was pre-Serial.JC2 - again with the dismissal of an entire genre - try listening to Webern's opus 1 (his 'official' opus 1, not actually the first piece he wrote, but the first he felt happy enough with to award an opus number to) Passacaglia, and Berg's violin concerto (one of the masterworks of the last century IMO) for some serial music that hopefully will revise your nailgun approach.
Webern vs. Schoenberg - well, there's a debateFor my part, although Webern might not have reached the heights he did without his teacher's profound influence (Webern did after all start writing in a romantic style - although even his early stuff is rather magical - try Im Sommerwind for example) he (Webern) is on a different place of genius from Schoenberg. The five pieces for orchestra (and the six pieces too), and the opus 21 Symphony, for instance, are unmatched I think for sheer inspiration by anything by Schoenberg - although I'd be very happy to be corrected - point me at the best of Schoenberg, please
I'm not very knowledgable about him.
And while we're on 20th century geniuses - can I throw Messiaen into the mix. On a par with Bach in my opinion. Discuss![]()

I'm impressed; you're a pianist of some merit, then?
Which sections did you play?
Mind you, IIRC Webern's Passacaglia (beautiful though it is) was pre-Serial.
As for Berg's Violin Concerto, I stopped talking about it a couple of years ago, because every time someone I knew praised a piece of violin music I compared it to berg and found it wanting.
do you know Magnus Lindberg's Chorale? Also based on Es Ist Genug. It's on the same CD as his stunning clarinet concerto, played by Kari Krikkuu who is quite frankly supernaturally brilliant.Fantastic.
Do you have any particular recommendations of a recording. I have Michel Beroff. But I know he wrote them for his wife. I haven't heard a recording of her playing them, though.
What's the Aimard like?
