If it was at New Addington, your best bet now is ebay.ska invita said:where's the slide gone?
HackneyE9 said:When's Forest Hill pool(s) re-open?
.London Borough of Lewisham said:Latest
Currently, detailed costs and timelines on refurbishment of Forest Hill Pools are being worked up by council officers in Property Services.
The Council has asked Parkwood Leisure to continue to have a staff presence at the pool, and keep the Victorian pool plant working and the building heated to ensure its structural integrity. A 24 hour security presence is also on site.
September 2007
RubyToogood said:Glad you enjoyed it! Question is, is it warm enough for Tooting this weekend?!

London_Calling said:If it was at New Addington, your best bet now is ebay.
you know that!ice-is-forming said:
RubyToogood said:Originally Posted by HackneyE9
When's Forest Hill pool(s) re-open?
Quote:
Originally Posted by London Borough of Lewisham
Latest
Currently, detailed costs and timelines on refurbishment of Forest Hill Pools are being worked up by council officers in Property Services.
The Council has asked Parkwood Leisure to continue to have a staff presence at the pool, and keep the Victorian pool plant working and the building heated to ensure its structural integrity. A 24 hour security presence is also on site.
September 2007
I really like the place, had membership there for years and go at least 3 times a week. The pool is a bit on the small side(they are in the process of adding another larger pool) but if you go there in the day there's not too many other people in there so there's plenty of room
david dissadent said:Latchmere has a wave machine....

david dissadent said:Latchmere has a wave machine....


RubyToogood said:One of my neighbours who belongs to the club at Tooting Lido was pressing me to join (you can swim all year round) but I'd much rather do that at Brockwell if it was available which of course it's not <cross>
Tricky Skills said:Clapham has been my pool of choice recently. The 33m pool is great and the changing rooms are basic, but adequate. Nice friendly staff.

An interesting point, possibly soon to be made irrelevant with the proposed shortening of the Clapham pool to a 'standard' 25m. Why on earth anyone would want to fill a part of a pool in is beyond me.
First guess, to make it available for gala's and team/league swims?Why on earth anyone would want to fill a part of a pool in is beyond me.
You're right <sigh>. My neighbour told me herself that she only manages a couple of widths this time of year.Ruby - that's all well and good but I did join Tooting and did swim in February and believe me you won't be doing much more than a width - one length if you're really brave - I did the same at Brockwell in December. It's bracing but not exactly exercise in the sense of a proper swim! Brockwell will be open from May this year and for anything more than a bodyshock "icicle" dip you probably couldn't go a whole lot earlier in an unheated open pool - maybe a month or so at most.
[A pedant writes...]
Has anyone actually measured it?
I'd always assumed that Streatham and Clapham were both 100 feet long = 33 1/3rd yards = only 30.48 metres, meaning that you've got to do 17.6 (round it up to 18 for masochism) lengths to cover a mile and 32.8 lengths (round up to 33) to do a km swim.
But someone then suggested to me that some Imperial pools were actually 110 feet long (i.e 5 chains or 1/6th of a furlong) = 33.528 metres. So do you only need to do exactly 16 lengths for a mile and 29.8258 lengths for a km![]()
![]()
Do you mean the other way round - miles are longer than kms? (a km is 5/8 of a mile)

lang rabbie said:[A duly corrected pedant writes...]
Has anyone actually measured it?
I'd always assumed that Streatham and Clapham were both 100 feet long = 33 1/3rd yards = only 30.48 metres, meaning that you've got to do 52.8(round it up to 53 for masochism) lengths to cover a mile and 32.8 lengths (round up to 33) to do a km swim.
But someone then suggested to me that some Imperial pools were actually 110 feet long (i.e 5 chains or 1/6th of a furlong) = 33.528 metres. So do you only need to do exactly 48 lengths for a mile and 29.8258 lengths for a km
Forgot to multiply by 3 for feet to yards ratio!![]()
![]()
I think it should have read
... will correct again if necessary when sober in the morning
