Barking_Mad
Non sibi sed omnibus
On similar lines, this makes an interesting read, re Jeremy Vine and his show
http://www.spinwatch.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1469
Now it was clear why this particular Muslim had been invited onto the show. It wasn’t to provide a platform for those who oppose the ‘war on terror’. It wasn’t to allow a public figure to make the connection between the London bombings and the invasion of Iraq. It was precisely to discredit such viewpoints, chuck them in the loony bin with all the rest. That’s why the media loves to quote Islamic fundamentalist cranks. Not only do they help to make Islam seem sinister and inherently malevolent, they also help to discredit anti-war thinking in general. They help to conflate important truths about the world (Blair IS a liar and a terrorist) with superstition and bigotry. Both truth and fiction can be combined to discredit each other.
With the playing field thoroughly skewed it was now safe to bring on ‘a moderate Muslim’ from the MAB. And my, how moderate he was. With that as an introduction who wouldn’t be? The MAB could be a important political force at this time. Peaceable people, appalled at the West’s treatment of those in other countries. This could have been a valuable opportunity for him to tell us about their suffering, and the suffering of friends and relatives abroad. Instead he had to waste the first half of the interview bowing and scraping to distance himself from the previous speaker. By the time he did get to: “But, well you know, the west’s role in the world….” Jeremy was still able to close him down, effortlessly: “So you’re saying that these bombings are justified by our foreign policy? We had it coming to us?”, to which the poor man flung himself to the floor again, and begged for another whipping. Fat chance of any issues being discussed.
http://www.spinwatch.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1469

) and I like Rod Sharp, just because he's so whimsical. That's about it really - oh and Mark Clement.