You reply shows that:
1. you research has been cursory - think scale, spread and duration of such abuses;
2. you have no appreciation of what the work house test and the principle of less eligibility actually involved - think effect on families and relative deprivation in an economy where low wages were insufficient to keep people out of poverty;
3. your initial attack on the Dickens account of the workhouse was wrong, but you don' have the honesty to admit it.
Have another better informed go - Louis MacNeice