Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Putin: Cold War 2?

I wouldn't confuse Russia's hankering after their glory days of being an Empire with wanting a return to being a Soviet State. It's in their interests to have their satelites under their influence, if they can get away with it, less so a return to "Comminism".

Don't think Putin wants any return to communism, but a return to being a 'superpower'? oh aye, I think that's a thought that keeps him warm at night.
And as Obama and the US seeks to become more isolationist Putin exploits their perceived weakness, a nibble here a nibble there
And while politicians and strategists might realise sanctions etc are having a real effect on Russia the perception to those who live on the margins of Russia are about the realities, that Russia can deploy force without a robust reaction from the west, red lines being redrawn etc.
Since 89 people have though of Russia as an empire that had become defunct, Putin sees an opportunity to revise that perception with little risk or cost to Russia or himself.
 

The article references The Menace of Unreality (produced by a think-tank with close ties to the National Endowment for Democracy) that talks about 'the Kremlins strategy of weaponizing information'. I reckon that term is itself a "weaponization of..." well, not really information as such... Anyway, the internet and the media are full of weaponized thought if you ask me, for the most part aimed eastward (and far-eastward).

That aside, the main thrust of the article in frogwomans link seems to be that there are racists in Russia, both 'pro-Kremlin' and 'anti-Kremlin', and that the Kremlin uses events in Ferguson to propaganda that the US is not a perfect society after all, and that in so doing it hopes to "distract attention from events in Ukraine". I'm not sure what the point is here though, the US is also lousy with racists at all levels, and also uses political turmoil in other nations to condemn them (and worse, in my opinion we've seen political reform movements hijacked by jihadists for example and turned into out an out civil wars, or used to push through fascist coups, with shadowy US organs lurking in the background orchestrating arms, cash and 'weaponized media').

And to be honest I'm not sure Russia would like to distract people from the concept that it has national interests that it will stand up for, the Russians don't seem to be ashamed of their position re the Ukraine... that they won't allow their naval base to be lost, or that they will informally support the East Ukrainians under assault from the current Kiev regime. Not sure race-riots in the US are something they take into consideration on those issues really.

In sum I don't think one can really say "there are a lot of racist fuckwits in Russia, obviously all a part of Vladimir Putins plan", anymore than you could hold Barrack Obama responsible from the kind of vile one finds in a standard YouTube comment. Still, points to the article for the words "Kremlin, Ferguson, Racist, Putin, Russia, Propaganda" all in the same article.
 
Last edited:
The article references The Menace of Unreality (produced by a think-tank with close ties to the National Endowment for Democracy) that talks about 'the Kremlins strategy of weaponizing information'. I reckon that term is itself a "weaponization of..." well, not really information as such... Anyway, the internet and the media are full of weaponized thought if you ask me, for the most part aimed eastward (and far-eastward).

That aside, the main thrust of the article in frogwomans link seems to be that there are racists in Russia, both 'pro-Kremlin' and 'anti-Kremlin', and that the Kremlin uses events in Ferguson to propaganda that the US is not a perfect society after all, and that in so doing it hopes to "distract attention from events in Ukraine". I'm not sure what the point is here though, the US is also lousy with racists at all levels, and also uses political turmoil in other nations to condemn them (and worse, in my opinion we've seen political reform movements hijacked by jihadists for example and turned into out an out civil wars, or used to push through fascist coups, with shadowy US organs lurking in the background orchestrating arms, cash and 'weaponized media messaging').

And to be honest I'm not sure Russia would like to distract people from the concept that it has national interests that it will stand up for, the Russians don't seem to be ashamed of what's happening in the Ukraine... that they won't allow their naval base to be lost, or that they will informally support the East Ukrainians under assault from the current Kiev regime. Not sure race-riots in the US are something they take into consideration on those issues really.

In sum I don't think one can really say "there are a lot of racist fuckwits in Russia, obviously all a part of Vladimir Putins plan", anymore than you could hold Barrack Obama responsible from the kind of vile one finds in a standard YouTube comments. Still, a link is a link right.

Did you actually read the link? It's talking about critics of Putin's policy in Russia and Ukraine as well as supporters - ie Russian rebels being likened to Ferguson protesters.
 
Did you actually read the link? It's talking about critics of Putin's policy in Russia and Ukraine as well as supporters - ie Russian rebels being likened to Ferguson protesters.

I read it, and yes it did mention the linking of Ferguson protesters to Russian rebels by Putins critics (who don't like the Ukrainian rebels).

Part of the "Racists are in Russia, both pro and anti Kremlin" thing I picked up on in my post.
 
Putin is def right to fund the National Front mind eh camo?

Distasteful indeed if that's going down, we don't really know though. As the article starts off with the following:

"President Vladimir Putin is widely suspected of being behind an extraordinary Russian cash and charm offensive that is reported to be trying to woo Europe’s far-right populist parties in order to strengthen the Kremlin’s political influence within the European Union."

Widely suspected by who? Reported from where? We've seen in recent years that you really have to keep frosty when it comes to reading er.... 'news papers', turns out that they are not really in the business of 'reporting news' for starters.

And what are they accusing him of anyway, wooing 'populist parties in Europe' with the plan to somehow influence European politics in Russias favor? Frankly I'm glad I'm not a politician, to spend my time getting up to this sort of thing... but if the Russians are deviously attempting to influence European politics by use of populist political parties... (and is it their fault that off-chorus populist-politics in Europe is currently dominated by the likes of Le Front or UKIP?) at least they're not out funding and training nazi battalions so far. Fingers crossed eh.

azovnato.jpg
 
Last edited:
Um, this tale of funding appeared in the Independent - given Lebedev's antipathy towards Putin, I would not like to swear on the veracity of these claims.
 
Um, this tale of funding appeared in the Independent - given Lebedev's antipathy towards Putin, I would not like to swear on the veracity of these claims.
The story appeared in many papers - originally in the french mediapart investigative group's journal - it was their investigation that turned up the series of official documents and records revealing the funding and links - and that's what would need to be undermined rather than the self-interest of lebedev in publishing a very brief summary of the loans 3 or 4 days after the original piece - plus the National Front have confirmed the claims. And they have revealed further loans to far-right and fascist groups. They have an excellent reputation for their independent investigative journalism.
 
Last edited:
Le Pen even said France should abandon NATO and form a military alliance with Russia along the Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis, which would represent the creation of a Pan-European Union that would include Russia. The party lists this notion as the first of its 11 key principles on foreign policy.

Don't know what Berlin would make of the idea?
 
The story appeared in many papers - originally in the french mediapart investigative group's journal - it was their investigation that turned up the series of official documents and records revealing the funding and links - and that's what would need to be undermined rather than the self-interest of lebedev in publishing a very brief summary of the loans 3 or 4 days after the original piece - plus the National Front have confirmed the claims. And they have revealed further loans to far-right and fascist groups. They have an excellent reputation for their independent investigative journalism.

Wasn't shekhotsov talking about this a while back?

Mind you in the same article it talking about a loan to the German social democrats as well who I am assuming are similar to the labour party?
 
Wasn't shekhotsov talking about this a while back?

Mind you in the same article it talking about a loan to the German social democrats as well who I am assuming are similar to the labour party?
The money to the germans was to the Alternative for Germany - a sort of UKIP with many far-right links. The social democrats were just mentioned as their last leader was seen as sympathetic to russian interests - in fact he now works for them. They don't need money from russia. That was about interlocking elite connections.
 
The story appeared in many papers - originally in the french mediapart investigative group's journal - it was their investigation that turned up the series of official documents and records revealing the funding and links - and that's what would need to be undermined rather than the self-interest of lebedev in publishing a very brief summary of the loans 3 or 4 days after the original piece - plus the National Front have confirmed the claims. And they have revealed further loans to far-right and fascist groups. They have an excellent reputation for their independent investigative journalism.
Mediapart have continued pulling at these strings:

Crimea, Russian loans and the Le Pens: the Kremlin's intriguing SMS messages

Secret text messages hacked from a senior official at the Kremlin highlight an intriguing coincidence between the Front National's support for the annexation of Crimea and the payment in subsequent months of 11 million euros in Russian bank loans to its president Marine Le Pen and her father Jean-Marie for party funding. SMS messages between two Russians refer to Marine Le Pen's recognition of the results of the Crimean referendum on March 17th, 2014, and the fact that she should be “thanked” in some way for it.

Article is sub only for now, but summary here

The Russian hacking collective Anonymous International has leaked close to 40,000 text messages allegedly sent and received by a high-ranking Russian official that reference a potential financing deal between Russia and France's far-right National Front (FN) party in exchange for FN leader Marine Le Pen's public endorsement of Russia's annexation of Crimea in March 2014.

The online French investigative journal Mediapartpublished the hacked text messages, which allegedly belong to Timur Prokopenko, head of Russia's internal affairs department.
 
Back
Top Bottom