gentlegreen
I hummus, therefore I am ...
Any chance of an answer ?

Tbh I think Crispy is being the voice of calm reason on this issue and not patronising at all. Obviously you've had a bad experience with a cyclist, which I am sorry for (and I hope your daughter wasn't too badly hurt), but if you think he's being patronising on what he's posted here I suspect it's more you're misinterpreting his posts because of your bad experience with this one cyclist.crispy. my 4 year old was injured by a cyclist who decided to do exactly what you say you do at the lights...and he walked straight into her on the path, didn't see her, cus he was too busy watching to see if he'd beaten the cars and was able to get off as fast as he could on the other side. if i'd taken her pushchair for a wander in the road, because i couldn't be bothered to wait for the lights to go, then i'd be putting her and other road-users at risk. (a pram can do as much damage as a bike.) so why is it ok for bikes to be pushed across when there IS an alternative...to just wait...blimey...you're a patronising fuck. i hadn't realised this before.



I find that quite insulting
Because your daughter got hit by an inconsiderate person running with their bike, you're condemming me for the same crime. When I'm on my bike, I'm a cyclist and a road user. I obey the laws of the road and am considerate of other road users. When I'm off my bike I'm a pedestrian and a pavement user. I obey the laws of the pavement and am considerate of other pavement users. When I'm walking my bike, I walk it, not run it.
I have been hit by inconsiderate people with pushchairs before, but I am not going to condemn all people with pushchairs.
INconsideration is exactly what i was talking about..i said my bugbears were those..not that i'd knock a cyclist off if he tried to pass me, but if an INCONSIDERATE one did it, then i might be tempted to, yeah.

INconsideration is exactly what i was talking about..i said my bugbears were those..not that i'd knock a cyclist off if he tried to pass me, but if an INCONSIDERATE one did it, then i might be tempted to, yeah.

*shrug* doesn't help anyone. but this is a cylcists vs. motorists thread, so what can you do eh?
Tbf, I hoped she was talking about the fantasy of knocking them over.neither does knocking people off bikes if the way they pass your car offends you.
My ribs are still fucked from being knocked off 3 years ago. I still hurt from being knocked off last month. If I thought somebody did that deliberately then abuse would be the least they could expect.



*shrug* doesn't help anyone. but this is a cylcists vs. motorists thread, so what can you do eh?

*shrug* doesn't help anyone. but this is a cylcists vs. motorists thread, so what can you do eh?
Which hopefully makes you a better cyclist, and vice versa.Actually, I drove to work today so I'm a motorist too.![]()
I only started cycling a few months ago, I reckon it's made me more thoughtful of cyclists as a pedestrian. Having experience of different roles in the road hopefully makes people more considerate of other road users. That's not to say that some cyclists don't act like twats, but then some pedestrians and motorists also act like twats. Can't change humanity. 
No, its a twats versus reasonable people thread.

...you boys(and girls) play birds of a feather now. i have to go do important stuff, right 
I think that is the main reason not to encourage cyclists to cycle through ped priority lights as a rule of thumb. I think herbsman has got a point to a degree but the trouble is that some cyclists are completely selfish fuckwits who endanger the health of other cyclists and peds. And unfortunately, as has been evidenced here to a degree, that means all cyclists being regarded as pondlife who are fair game to be knocked off.What, you never cross the road on the red man?
I quite often use the 'dismount, cross on the green man, remount' tactic. It would be equally safe for me to trundle over the junction riding my bike, but that's illegal (and it really pisses other people off) so I don't.
yeah, it was more fantasy than actual fact, cus i'm not that much of an inconsiderate twat...

No. If you're not on your bike and are pushing it, then you're a pedestrian pushing a bike, simple as thatI was under the impression that, even whilst pushing a push bike certain traffic laws applied. eg pushing a bike across a zebra crossing


Do you mean crossing to the other side of the pavement at the crossing, or walking a bike over a crossing to continue on the road? If you meant the first one, then a prior post from DB would contradict that.I was under the impression that, even whilst pushing a push bike certain traffic laws applied. eg pushing a bike across a zebra crossing
BUT
if picked up and carried, the bike became a parcel and the laws no longer applied.
However, if it is a commonly held belief that you have no right to cross a zebra crossing wheeling your bike across, this may explain why not 1 but 3 cars didn't stop for me at one the other day, with me dismounted from my bike and one foot firmly on the crossing (all giving me the right to cross from my understanding). The other explanation of course is that they were all being selfish cunts!If you are a pedestrian pushing a bike the laws applicable to pedestrians (or the lack of them, in this context) apply to you.
(If you are a pedestrian pushing a car, likewise)
Traffic laws only apply to cars, bikes and other vehicles being driven or ridden.

Cars can go at 70mph, but on my bike I've only ever managed 36 downhill on a good day (today in fact), so cars should be limited to 36mph.then i should be going down the middle of the traffic with my shopping trolley, then, right? it has wheels don't it?
stupid MAN thinking, innit


this really pisses me off as a car driver..one rule for us - another for the cyclists. same for motorbikes. since when as it anywhere near fair that they get to drive down between 2 lanes of traffic to be first off at lights?
why can't they wait at the lights like the rest of us? one of my BIGGEST bug-bears...
everyone should use the roads in consideration of ALL road users, surely??!