
waterloowelshy said:this protest still misses the point completely imo. Protest against the war by all means.
But protesting about recruiting of soldiers is simply ridiculous. It is taking away freedom of those that may want to join and as ive said before i thought the whole point was that we are against removing peoples freedom?![]()
very good point. Information for those considering joining is vital, so providing all the facts would be reat to ensure that full thought was given to the pros and cons of joining. But the intial post seems to suggest that the protest aims at shutting recruitment centres down. Is the protest aimed at informing then? and would it not be better to use the resources of the protest to inform people about the downsides of joining as opposed to just protesting blindly?munkeeunit said:informing those who may want to join of the realities of war, and that they themselves will be exposed to depleted uranium, can't be a bad thing. Many of the people who join are estate kids escaping the sheer boredom of service jobs, low pay and unemployment.
Despite the relentless propaganda, which attempts to normalise 1 1/4 million unemployed as full employment, most people can't realistically be considered to be joining the army out of freely made choice.
I think the issue is one of how the protest is pitched. If it is pitched so as make those who are considering joining feel like the enemy, it may just result in them being more determined to join. But if they're given information denied them by the mainstream media, they may instead see friendly concern.
Hey dude, did you read my long and time-consuming post explaining all that? I took ages explaining exactly why this wasn't an example of protesting blindly. Cos from this recent post....waterloowelshy said:very good point. Information for those considering joining is vital, so providing all the facts would be reat to ensure that full thought was given to the pros and cons of joining. But the intial post seems to suggest that the protest aims at shutting recruitment centres down. Is the protest aimed at informing then? and would it not be better to use the resources of the protest to inform people about the downsides of joining as opposed to just protesting blindly?
... it seems to me like you didn't read what I said at all, like. And all I was doing is trying to help.It is taking away freedom of those that may want to join and as ive said before i thought the whole point was that we are against removing peoples freedom?

youre right - i havent the time or inclination to read your whole post in detail at the mo. not ignoring its contents but really cant look at it properly at the mo. hopefully soon though. ill try and get back to you when i can.llantwit said:Hey dude, did you read my long and time-consuming post explaining all that? I took ages explaining exactly why this wasn't an example of protesting blindly. Cos from this recent post....
... it seems to me like you didn't read what I said at all, like. And all I was doing is trying to help.![]()
llantwit said:[bourgeois mode/]Can't make it - going to the Hay Festival[/Bourgeois mode off]
![]()
waterloowelshy said:very good point. Information for those considering joining is vital, so providing all the facts would be reat to ensure that full thought was given to the pros and cons of joining. But the intial post seems to suggest that the protest aims at shutting recruitment centres down. Is the protest aimed at informing then? and would it not be better to use the resources of the protest to inform people about the downsides of joining as opposed to just protesting blindly?

Fruitloop said:I reckon he knows that![]()
Will do - cheers Udo. Good luck with the demo.Udo Erasmus said:Try and catch Max, he is speaking at the Hay Fringe Festival
waterloowelshy said:this protest still misses the point completely imo. Protest against the war by all means.
But protesting about recruiting of soldiers is simply ridiculous. It is taking away freedom of those that may want to join and as ive said before i thought the whole point was that we are against removing peoples freedom?![]()

RubberBuccaneer said:Welsh Army for the Workers Republic [WAWR]
As stated earlier, this groups initials form WAWR which is the welsh word for dawn. It announced its existence in the early 1980's and unlike the previous three groups targeted on political and military targets.
The bomb attacks for which this group claimed responsibility included Army Recruiting Offices, local Conservative Offices and Government Offices. A group of its members were arrested in 1983 and charged with explosives and conspiracy offences.
In a trial at Cardiff Crown Court the case collapsed and only one defendant was convicted. This result notwithstanding, following this trial no more claims of responsibility have been made on behalf of this group. It seems to have ceased operations
RubberBuccaneer said:O Mate
My Lai was Vietnam
Dai Sheep said:Good book about that published in 1984 called 'Police Conspiracy' (John Osmond) I believe. I read it for some history coursework - also highlights some of the corrupt and incompetent operations of SW Police and special branch in relation to this botched trial.
osterberg said:And the Red Choir insisted on singing.If you want to present something that looks like a credible protest you don't want a bunch of loonies in red t-shirts jumping up and down and 'singing' out of tune.
That's pathetic - I've never understood why the Cardiff left have such a bugbear with the Red Choir. They certainly outstrip every last one of the rest of us for their commitment and longevity, and they understand solidarity in a way that seems sadly lacking among other groupuscules in this city.
llantwit said:...or is it simply about having loonies in red singing badly?
osterberg said:Here's some actual political activity taking place in sleepy Cardiff.
RubberBuccaneer said:Do you ( generally now ) think having crusty types, hippies, and rag tags of all groups leftist/anarchist makes for an effective demo, or would smartly dressed non ranting people be more affective for accessing the mainstream ?
