Perhaps because it is often made and many people seem to think it is true?
I guess it can be true, but all the same I'd do a job like cleaning an oven for money for most folks; or hire almost anyone to clean my oven. What I want is clean oven.
Seems to me that what people want when buying sex is an altogether more complicated question.
Sex work like pole dancing is advertised in Job Centres.
However, you can refuse to apply for such jobs and it doesn't affect your claim.
Really? REALLY?
I don't think there's anything intrinsically wrong with prostitution. If someone says to someone else, i'll pay you fifty quid if i can sleep with you, and the other person accepts, then i can't see anything wrong with it. the problem is wuith the industry.I'll ad more later.
Did you happen to see The Big Question this morning? Some bozo in the audience said that being a prostitute was no more soul destroying than working in an office.
I know which one I would prefer.
that seems to be the same level as jessiedogs argument here.
Only if they could claim it on expenses.
tbh there's a lot of muddied waters on this thread and elsewhere between trafficking and prostitution and the sex industry. The three being distinct but overlapping phenomena.

Because many people, for whatever reason (usually normative morality and/or media representations) view prostitution through a moral lens rather than a logical one.As long as the participants are wholly consenting what is the problem with prostitution? I really can't see why people automatically assume prostitution is so unacceptable.
Circumstances certainly contribute. The expensiveness of illegal drugs, for example, or the lack of grant to cover student costs, to give two very workaday examples.I fully accept that there are cases of people going into the profession because circumstances force them into it. In this case surely it is the circumstances that need addressing more than the act of prostitution?
Fucking someone for money comes just below killing somebody for money. Soul-destroying.
This is true, but it doesn't get us very far. There's an awful lot of people in jobs that they'd chuck in tomorrow if they could get another, even at the same wages.They may say 'it's just a job' but if they could have got another job that paid the same amount I don't think most of them would do it.
It's only a genuine choice for the few.
This is true, but it doesn't get us very far. There's an awful lot of people in jobs that they'd chuck in tomorrow if they could get another, even at the same wages.
Economic coercion affects us all. Prostitutes are just like the rest of us in that respect.
Sex work and "other work" are not generally viewed as being interchangeable. As evidenced by the fact that other work is routinely advertised in Job Centres but sex work is never advertised in job centres.
The authorities therefore perceive a difference.
We're talking about the issue exactly because some do consider it; and some of those go on to sell sex for money.Why don't they consider prostitution then?
I would find it very, very difficult if my mother, sister, wife ended up in that line of work. and i think i would find it difficult no matter how liberal and accepting our society would be toward prostitution.
it's got something to do with the nature of sex, i suppose.




It's not a very good Anthropology 101 then - people might conclude from some posts that there was no difference, anthropologically speaking, between carrying out demeaning manual tasks out of economic necessity and carrying out sexual behaviour out of economic necessity.
I dare say there are some people who would commit sex acts for money but find fetching coffee for people in a meeting in an office sufficiently demeaning that they would refuse to do it.
I dare say there are some people who would commit sex acts for money but find fetching coffee for people in a meeting in an office sufficiently demeaning that they would refuse to do it.