Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Harry - what a cock

Bob_the_lost said:
So he's ginger, doesn't want to be pampered because of his parents and has german ancestors.

Therefore he should be shot.

If you're going to rant and moan about the royalty at least have some fucking consistency.
Anyone who wants to contribute to that bloodbath deserves to be shot.
 
I was disappointed the Lib Dem on Question Time the other night didn't say "No" as to whether he should to Iraq, and then qualify it by saying that no other British soldier should either.
 
I think this is an attempt to split the ant-war movement. If he does go I think I might find myself wanting the occupation to go on that bit longer to increase the odds of him getting himself blown up.
 
emanymton said:
I think this is an attempt to split the ant-war movement. If he does go I think I might find myself wanting the occupation to go on that bit longer to increase the odds of him getting himself blown up.

I hate the little cunt but I don't want him to get killed out there – imagine the outpouring of sympathy and 24/7 mourning we'd have to put up with. His "heroic" death would also strengthen the Royals.

Better he goes over, loses his bottle and get court-martialled for cowardice.
 
andy2002 said:
Better he goes over, loses his bottle and get court-martialled for cowardice.
I really don't think it's helpful for internet warriors to pontificate on the potential bravery of real life soldiers. I am assuming - safely, I suspect - that you, like me, have taken good care in the course of our lives to avoid facing people who want to kill us.

The young man in question has trained for and is anxious to carry out duties on behalf of the state which involve putting his health and his life at great risk. His superiors will have a difficult choice to make and whatever we m ight think of the wider issues we should wish him, and them, the best.
 
Fullyplumped said:
The young man in question has trained for and is anxious to carry out duties on behalf of the state which involve putting his health and his life at great risk. His superiors will have a difficult choice to make and whatever we m ight think of the wider issues we should wish him, and them, the best.

Wish him "the best"? You must be joking. Firstly, as a human being he (and his vile family) embodies pretty much everything I despise. Secondly, he wants to fight in a war with which I passionately disagree. The only reason I hope he gets back safely is because I don't want his "heroic death" to increase the popularity of the Royal Family and divert attention from the Iraq war's real issues.
 
andy2002 said:
Wish him "the best"? You must be joking. Firstly, as a human being he (and his vile family) embodies pretty much everything I despise.
You mean the privelidge and pampering that he was born into and chose to avoid for a while? :rolleyes: But who gives a shit, shoot him in the face! He was doomed from birth!

This is what i meant when i asked for some consistency. :D
 
Bob_the_lost said:
You mean the privelidge and pampering that he was born into and chose to avoid for a while? :rolleyes: But who gives a shit, shoot him in the face! He was doomed from birth!

This is what i meant when i asked for some consistency. :D

Chose to avoid? What on earth are you talking about? :confused:
 
Bob_the_lost said:
Buckingham palace = large comfy place with statues and butlers 'n stuff.
Sandhurst / Army = not

Any help?

Yeah, because he won't have any privileges in Iraq, will he? I imagine he'll be right there on the frontline shoulder-to-shoulder with all the other soldiers, not permanently surrounded by a bunch of cannon fodder/bodyguards with instructions to protect him at all costs. Frankly, he'd be doing those people a big favour if he didn't go.
 
andy2002 said:
Yeah, because he won't have any privileges in Iraq, will he? I imagine he'll be right there on the frontline shoulder-to-shoulder with all the other soldiers, not permanently surrounded by a bunch of cannon fodder/bodyguards with instructions to protect him at all costs. Frankly, he'd be doing those people a big favour if he didn't go.
So in other words you wouldn't remove him from the "shoot on sight" list untill he renounced everything and took up yoghurt weaving.
 
Bob_the_lost said:
Buckingham palace = large comfy place with statues and butlers 'n stuff.
Sandhurst / Army = not

Any help?
He gets to boss scummers about and shoot at woggos. That's what royals are bred to do. As an avid consumer of violent imagery, I support the war and welcome the prospect of the useless parasitical cunt having his bits blown off.
 
Bob_the_lost said:
So in other words you wouldn't remove him from the "shoot on sight" list untill he renounced everything and took up yoghurt weaving.

At no stage have I suggested he should be shot on sight – just the opposite, actually.
 
andy2002 said:
At no stage have I suggested he should be shot on sight – just the opposite, actually.
You're right, sorry about that. But the point (sort of) stands, what would he have to do to make up for his birth in your eyes? And no, he won't be hauling around bodygaurds 24/7, that's not how it works.
 
Bob_the_lost said:
You're right, sorry about that. But the point (sort of) stands, what would he have to do to make up for his birth in your eyes? And no, he won't be hauling around bodygaurds 24/7, that's not how it works.

I was exaggerating for effect, but it's pretty likely he's either a) going to be protected in some way above and beyond a regular soldier or b) be kept away from real danger. Both of which are hardly ideal if he genuinely wants to get stuck in and do whatever job they are meant to be doing over there.

What would he have to do to make up for his birth in my eyes? Well, not going to Iraq in the first place to participate in an extremely foolhardy war might be a step in the right direction.
 
I am no Prince Harry fan, but it seems the bloke is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Don't go to Iraq and the cries will be of favouritism because he's a royal, and if he does go there will be endless criticism that he is putting his colleagues at risk cos he's a prime target.

I think they just ought to sneak him in there while all the controversy is raging, let him do his job as a soldier and by the time anyones realised he's there it'll be time for him to come back. End of drama .

Unless he manages to get himself blown up that is.
 
Blimey there are some angry bitter people on this thread. I really don't see what the big deal is. Tbh.. I reckon it would be a bigger issue if he didn't go. Then we'd have to question whats the point of letting him have a career in the army if they can't send him anywhere useful anyway.
 
felixthecat said:
Sad innit? But there again, I reckon that would have been me 20 years ago.

I've mellowed with age - like a good port :)

You might accept these royal parasitic worms you mellowed piece of shit, but others don't. :mad: Btw, port is a known to bring on gout. I'd order your bath chair now. :)
 
felixthecat said:
Sad innit? But there again, I reckon that would have been me 20 years ago.

I've mellowed with age - like a good port :)

Hmmm. I've always hated the cunts with the same intensity I do now as I did on the first day that it dawned on me that royal privilege was perhaps a tad unjust.

Go Jihadis! Off the wanker :)
 
Still, it seems at least possible that this will cause the media to get a bit more interested in the situation faced by British troops in Iraq, given that a sleb like Prince Harry actually interests media editors in a way that ordinary squaddies don't. It's not impossible that this in turn will make a small but worthwhile contribution to increasing the pressure to get them out faster.

It also potentially upsets and embarasses at least some pro-war types whose offspring of military age have 'other priorities', in the US if not over here.

He is a cock though.
 
MC5 said:
You might accept these royal parasitic worms you mellowed piece of shit, but others don't. :mad: Btw, port is a known to bring on gout. I'd order your bath chair now. :)

Whatever. I feel neither hate nor acceptance of them.

But hate is a destructive emotion that harm the person who feels it a whole lot more than the person its aimed at.

So fuck you and the white horse you rode in on:)
 
felixthecat said:
Sad innit? But there again, I reckon that would have been me 20 years ago.

I've mellowed with age - like a good port :)

I'm 40, Felix. What does that make you, 60? :p
 
felixthecat said:
But hate is a destructive emotion that harm the person who feels it a whole lot more than the person its aimed at.

But the hate is only partially aimed at Harry – a lot more of it is aimed at the Royals as a ridiculously antiquated institution that is both unjust and embarrassing. That kind of anger is healthy IMHO.
 
Back
Top Bottom