According to dailykos the supreme leader has claimed that he is leading a coup to protect the revolution.
That really is dreadful writing:What kind of utter shite journalism is this? It reads like a first draft by a fuckin 13 year old.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8098585.stm
The only hope, though certainly not the expectation, of calmer times perhaps is that, having won again, he might feel the time has come for compromise. He cannot run for another consecutive term, though he could stand again after a break.

They must feel like we did in 92 when everyone was sure the Tories must lose, but they didn't. But we're about to vote those cunts back in.
Interesting. Question is, can we trust Fisk?Fisk's report said:An interval here for lunch with a true and faithful friend of the Islamic Republic, a man I have known for many years who has risked his life and been imprisoned for Iran and who has never lied to me. We dined in an all-Iranian-food restaurant, along with his wife. He has often criticised the regime. A man unafraid. But I must repeat what he said. "The election figures are correct, Robert. Whatever you saw in Tehran, in the cities and in thousands of towns outside, they voted overwhelmingly for Ahmadinejad. Tabriz voted 80 per cent for Ahmadinejad. It was he who opened university courses there for the Azeri people to learn and win degrees in Azeri. In Mashad, the second city of Iran, there was a huge majority for Ahmadinejad after the imam of the great mosque attacked Rafsanjani of the Expediency Council who had started to ally himself with Mousavi. They knew what that meant: they had to vote for Ahmadinejad."
There are rumors of a protest at Vali-Asr today at 12:30pm.
This is a trap. please pass this on to everyone you know. The official word from Mousavi HQ is hold back and wait for word.
DO NOT ATTEND THE VALI-ASR PROTEST.
PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD
Interesting. Question is, can we trust Fisk?
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Stealing the Iranian Election
Classic situation isn't it - 'reformer' from within the system utilises public anger to lever himself into power, shits on that public after. It would be a terrible mistake for this to turn into/stay within the bounds of a pro-Mousavi movement rather than an anti-system movement.
Apparently Chavez has rung up Amabinalad to congratulate him, FFS!![]()
The way I see this, the Western reporters in Iran only associate with the urban bourgeoisie. They never meet the ordinary people. Thus they worked themselves up to expect another "color revolution" like in the Ukraine, and now they can't accept that the Iranian people have been so impertinent as to vote against their wishes.
I always knew this would happen.
The question isn't (solely) can you trust Fisk, but can you trust the bloke whose comments he reported?
Fisk clearly does trust that bloke and claims to have good reason to do so.
Even if you can, he could well be swallowing what he's fed. The source is effectively 'a bloke down the pub' unless I've missed something.The question isn't (solely) can you trust Fisk, but can you trust the bloke whose comments he reported?
Is Mousavi actually a reformist, or is that just a hat he's wearing?But isn't that they way that true progressive change often happens - a reformer from within the system breaks ranks. More often happens this way than through an "anti-system movement".
Martin Samuel writing an article about West Ham is less biassed than Robert Fisk!Interesting. Question is, can we trust Fisk?