Pray to fuck you're never involved in a fatal RTA in north Wales

[GarfieldLeChat]

Because, and this is quite easy to understand, they told the media at least twice that the images were confidential. The media decided to make the story (they could quite easily have not spread the story nationally) for no other reason than to have another go at Brunstrom.

yup course it is them evil media organsing offical police conferences i'll be t the chief was only there to tell them off right...

This is probably wasted upon you, of course, but I hope everyone else can realise that this (for the media at least) is not about this dead biker, or his families rights, but rather about their obsession with getting at an (to them at least) unpopular senior Police officer.

not it's not my objection and from what i can most peoples obejct has nothign to do with the fucking on message media campagin but the thought that the coppers think that they have no need to consdier anyone, they are a lwa untothemselves and they should have to both with trival formatilies such as asking a berivied family if they'd mind having shots of their desceased handed round for shock tactic purposes...

but hey i'm part of a global consprisy about the manner in which police are demonised in the media... right... you nut job...

He was naive to think that the media might be more concerned with helping to reduce the seasonal total of motorbike riders killing themselves in North Wales, yes.

naive and seemlingly uncaring too...

As for "permission to use the images", can you please point to the part of legislation that says the Police cannot use their own accident photographs to use in their own road safety briefings?

do learn to read love as i have already said diespite your repeated fall back of what law what law screeching no law just common decency...

can you now answer the question put to you perhaps...???

And please, dont try and pretend you are morally outraged, you just come across as a pre-spellchecked Daily Mail editorial when you do.

oi dyslexic your a spaka .... yeah good one... nice comment... well thought out... nicely timed... make s your poitn speldidly... oh yes that's the way to come back froma charge of moral bankruptcy and no mistake...

Garfield, trying to respond to you is a waste of effort in the main, because you generally seize on one random phrase, irrespective of the context it was in (in this instance, laptop's "boy racer lobby), and then build a straw-man around that one phrase, excluding anything which does not meet your exact definition, irrespective of how relevant it is (as was pointed out). You then combine this with statements that are usually utter tripe, if not outright factually wrong, even when these are directly contradicted by your own previous statements - of which the most recent is

sorry it must be very pleasing to play teacher to the retard kid eh...

laptop didnt, stanley edwards didnt, gixxer1000 didnt, bluestreak didnt...

i can't see where any of those posters have actually said it was reasonable for the cops not to have asked for permission from the family... can you honestly... mr facts???

morally bankrupt... utterly...

 

[laptop]

sorry it must be very pleasing to play teacher to the retard kid eh...

It has its moments....

i can't see where any of those posters have actually said it was reasonable for the cops not to have asked for permission from the family...

...but sometimes it's just too tiring.

 

[agricola]

sorry it must be very pleasing to play teacher to the retard kid eh...

No offence Garfield, but you might garner more sympathy with that line if you didnt spend most of the rest of your posts claiming for yourself moral superiority.

Besides, debating with you isnt pointless because of the spelling, its pointless because you invariably strawman, pretend not to have said statements, then claim you said something else, and ignore anything that does not match your self-definition of what has occured, even when its abundantly clear to everyone else. As is usual, of course.

 

[GarfieldLeChat]

No offence Garfield, but you might garner more sympathy with that line if you didnt spend most of the rest of your posts claiming for yourself moral superiority.

Besides, debating with you isnt pointless because of the spelling, its pointless because you invariably strawman, pretend not to have said statements, then claim you said something else, and ignore anything that does not match your self-definition of what has occured, even when its abundantly clear to everyone else. As is usual, of course.

why mention it at all then ...

mr moral vacculm?

 

[agricola]

context:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6655021.stm

 

[chymaera]

context:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/6655021.stm

There are a small percentage of bikers like the two in that report who are motorcyclings worst enemies. As the T-shirt says:- Matching leathers do not turn a wanker into a biker.

 

[agricola]

The IPCC report is now out:

http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/nwp_published_report.pdf

Apparently, the full details of the accident, including Gibney's name, had already been published in 2004. Brunstrom is guilty of having excessive trust in the media, it seems!

 

[denniseagle]

Just out of interest, how did the journalists know that permission HADN'T been given by the family of the dead man?

 

[agricola]

Just out of interest, how did the journalists know that permission HADN'T been given by the family of the dead man?

One journalist asked whether or not permission had been obtained, they told him it hadnt, he made a story out of it.