Dammit. FFS is this it then?
Precedent suggested a sweary pissfit would follow. Scattergun insults. A 'lick my asshole, cunt' or two.
Fuck this fucking forum and its tolerance and manners.
Fuck you all.
This is exactly where this thread was heading, from the OP onwards.

put an end to the constant harrassment or i'll start reporting your posts. this is your final warning... Y'hear?![]()

To be honest, it was always going to be a rarely used forum. That's the nature of the deep andmeaningful stuff. This isn't general, you know.
Then there is the majority group of U75ers who, like the politics forum, give this forum a wide berth.
Thats about it - I think ..
To be honest, it was always going to be a rarely used forum. That's the nature of the deep andmeaningful stuff. This isn't general, you know.
Because most threads in here turn into sub-"does the world disappear when I blink?" stonerisms.
When 'proper' philosophers give it a go, only those with enough book-learning can participate.
Because most threads in here turn into sub-"does the world disappear when I blink?" stonerisms.

Yeah, but this forum has always had room for the 'book philosophers' and the more independent kind of philosophers. There's always been both kinds of threads. Until the last few months or year. Now regular names no longer come here, and the first page has hardly any active threads.
Maybe they're doing time in an ashram or temple or something trying to get to the next level...
And on this occasion, I agree with Johnny.I for one got tired of the stoner-philosophical type discussions that crispy is talking about.



I for one got tired of the stoner-philosophical type discussions that crispy is talking about.
Yeah, but this forum has always had room for the 'book philosophers' and the more independent kind of philosophers. There's always been both kinds of threads. Until the last few months or year. Now regular names no longer come here, and the first page has hardly any active threads.
Maybe they're doing time in an ashram or temple or something trying to get to the next level...

Philosophy is best undertaken with people who are willing to look at all points of perspective of an argument and keep to the subject of the thread title without resorting to name-calling. The ego gets the better of some people who waste time adding some stupid comment which has got nothing to do with the OP whatsoever!

That crap hasn't been in here for two months at least. There's been two solid months of entertaining debate revolving around gorksi and his 'approach' since, overlapping with the science forum.
'independent philosophers'?
You have to be kidding. Max Freakout stopped posting because people wouldn't agree to his nonsense.
Why don't you go and visit his own board, where everybody agrees with each other, that max is right about everything? Is that philosophy is to you?
![]()
Not that fela would ever get involved in one of those - far too 'close minded' and focussed on the book learnin' types for an independent free thinker like himself or max...
Just exactly what do you hope to provide by way of meaning with this comment? How can it add to the debate? It is just so bloody subjective, and in equal measure, so bloody wrong.
I mean, i've read hundreds of books, and my job depends on my ability to critically read them.
It's comments like this, and those by dillinger, that really help downgrade this forum, and of course this thread. They are exactly what NoEgo's contribution pointed towards. It's really a bit sad.
Philosophy really ought to be able to rise above the cheap point scoring of politics. But here on urban it seems difficult to stay on course for some.
I think posters have left it because of this kind of post that i'm replying to. You are just so stuck in your own subjective measurement and judgment of people you barely know mate. Sad. You're far better than that really, so why do you do it?
Philosophy really ought to be able to rise above the cheap point scoring of politics.
Selectively bolded for the lulzJust exactly what do you hope to provide by way of meaning with this comment? How can it add to the debate? It is just so bloody subjective, and in equal measure, so bloody wrong.
I mean, i've read hundreds of books, and my job depends on my ability to critically read them.
It's comments like this, and those by dillinger, that really help downgrade this forum, and of course this thread. They are exactly what NoEgo's contribution pointed towards. It's really a bit sad.
Philosophy really ought to be able to rise above the cheap point scoring of politics. But here on urban it seems difficult to stay on course for some.
I think posters have left it because of this kind of post that i'm replying to. You are just so stuck in your own subjective measurement and judgment of people you barely know mate. Sad. You're far better than that really, so why do you do it?