editor said:Are you quoting these questions?
4thwrite said:I've 'eard that Habermas only uses t'internet to do e-bay and look up pictures of Big Brother contestants in the buff.
There's no evidence, but its a FACT.
Rebecca1983 said:. . . by making people annoyed . . .
If you're this ready to form opinions based on very limited information, are you quite sure you're ready to be doing a masters?Rebecca1983 said:I seem to have learnt a lot about the type of people who use these internet forums, interesting indeed...
And a good thing too, bloody Frankfurt schooler dreck.I don't think Habermas' 18th Century public sphere is to be recreated on the internet as many hoped, oh well... One way to kick democracy whilst its down.
She probably dislikes some students because they labour under delusions of intellectual adequacy, and attampt to garner research from bulletin boards when it is quite obvious they didn't have the courtesy to read the bulletin board's FAQx, where they would have been able to take note that the board owner requests people to contact him and ask permission prior to splurging their questions over his site.By the way do you dislike students because you have a crappy job and aren't quite intelligent enough to get into University?

Ah well, at least you'll have injected something interesting into it!"Yes"
Thought so... like i said the types of people who use forums- an interesting addition to my research.

A Dashing Blade said:Don't flatter yourself darlin'.
its more the typing (lazy student u kno)MC5 said:For a "successful postgraduate student" your spelling is atrocious.
A Dashing Blade said:Don't flatter yourself darlin'.

ViolentPanda said:If you're this ready to form opinions based on very limited information, are you quite sure you're ready to be doing a masters?
And a good thing too, bloody Frankfurt schooler dreck.
She probably dislikes some students because they labour under delusions of intellectual adequacy, and attampt to garner research from bulletin boards when it is quite obvious they didn't have the courtesy to read the bulletin board's FAQx, where they would have been able to take note that the board owner requests people to contact him and ask permission prior to splurging their questions over his site.
Ah well, at least you'll have injected something interesting into it!![]()
ViolentPanda said:I think her post exemplifies the Captain Mainwaring approach to face-saving; when you get caught out it's best to pretend that people are doing exactly what you wanted them to do/reacting exactly as you want them to react.
The problem with it is that it's fairly transparent.![]()
Rebecca1983 said:If u'd read all quotes u c ther was method in the madness...I did indeed waste a few minutes of my life reading the entire thread, and while I was able to discern the "method" (some of us aren't completely uneducated, you know!), I can't see quite how you can draw any usable conclusions from what little data you might have garnered.
Ah, I see, so you believe that if you don't acknowledge the rules you don't have to abide by them?...no i didnt read the FAQs but who does adn who cares
How touchingly sociopathic.
Rebecca1983 said:unfortuantely no, the key to good research is a back up plan and i dont need to save face as well so of us well i wont insult anyone else

Rebecca1983 said:. . . and i dont need to save face as well so of us well i wont insult anyone else
MC5 said:For a "successful postgraduate student" your spelling is atrocious.
Rebecca1983 said:I seem to have learnt a lot about the type of people who use these internet forums, interesting indeed... I don't think Habermas' 18th Century public sphere is to be recreated on the internet as many hoped, oh well... One way to kick democracy whilst its down.
By the way do you dislike students because you have a crappy job and aren't quite intelligent enough to get into University?
"Yes"
Thought so... like i said the types of people who use forums- an interesting addition to my research.
revol68 said:you had my sympathy up until this point.
cos
a) habermas is fucking shite, and his theory of civil society is nothing but a facade hiding real power relations, despite the fact he claims to be aiming for the perfect speech situation he seems to think it can happen under capitalism.
b) the idea that you have to be anyway smart to get into University. Fuck em i know people who are positively thick doing Phd's.

revol68 said:I wonder what perked up the mighty Attica's interest in my post?
seem's Althusser was right the subject realises itself through the call of ideology.

What? Please explain yourself.Nigel said:By the way,as a 23yr. old female student, have yo got big tits, relatively naive abou things, and after a few drinks easy to get laid???![]()
![]()
![]()
Fullyplumped said:What? Please explain yourself.
Nigel said:Rebecca does this have anything to do with free will: Dennet Popper etc.
Jerry Reuben said some interesting stuff about this sort of thing: YIPPIES/YUPPIES.
By the way,as a 23yr. old female student, have yo got big tits, relatively naive abou things, and after a few drinks easy to get laid???![]()
![]()
![]()

Brainaddict said:Hmmm, just noticed this thread. There *could* have been an interesting discussion here about Habermas and the internet, but the obnoxiousness of the poster ensured that didn't happen.
Funny that someone claiming to be researching internet forums should know so little about how to behave on one....
PS I have to echo fp in saying to Nigel, WTF you on about?


Not before i add a further WTFAnnO'Neemus said:ooh, last in please, ed/mods!![]()
to Nigel's:By the way,as a 23yr. old female student, have yo got big tits, relatively naive abou things, and after a few drinks easy to get laid???