You really are full of it.
citydreams said:
As I'm in a good mood I'll deign to respond.
finished your filing then
citydreams said:
I don't expect you to notice that you started the shit throwing. I'm just throwing it back at you. It would seem like you can't handle it. Or maybe your spelling/punctuation/manners are always this bad?
good one, arroding to your join date you are more than experinced wenough to know not to poke fun at peoples disablities love...
i'd reffer you to the dyslexica thread in shagging adesises but i doubt you are intelligable to read it...
citydreams said:
this sums you up nicely really...
citydreams said:
If you feel like you have something worth saying, which given your lack of knowledge on the subject I very much doubt, but for the sake of argument, and your apparent lack of self esteem, I am happy to try to debate with you any points you try to make.
again your assumption is not borne out of facts as yet again you assume i have nothing of knowedge to say on the matter and beleive love i have no need of proving my quailfication to you ... deal witht he points made as they stand rather than taking it as a personal attack eh?
if you can seperate yourself from your job then this would be easier...
citydreams said:
Now, where were we. Oh yes, post #172. Do you have anything worthwhile to add or are you just going to huff and puff?
i think you need to read again it was Dan who rasied capitas profits not i...
DapperDonDamaja said:
It's a shambles because they signed away too much to Capita. They made £121 million PROFIT last year. Don't tell me that strikes you as a good deal for London in exchange for them taking photos of a few numberplates. TfL completely fucked up the estimates, thinking they'd get £180 million in their first year, whereas the figure's closer 68. The upshot of this is that public transport is likely to become crappier, because it's unlikely that the Treasury is going to bail Ken out with his funding gap in the transport budget.
post
107
