Yep. Could you imagine this tech inside a proper dSLR?
Quite... and whilst they’re there, add a SIM card slot, make WiFi standard. Have options to auto-upload to a choice of providers. Google, Apple, Adobe
I think you're getting a bit ahead of yourself there. Computational photography has its place but it's no substitute for the same thing done right without it, at least where feasible. You can usually build up a better version of the truth by taking in more data and averaging it, but you can have all the data you like and if it's bad data you get a bad average and a bad result. Better to have good data from a single capture. Plus once you start taking in data beyond a single exposure you open yourself up to all kinds of artefacts and errors; most panoramas I've taken with a phone have something wrong with them, and no it's not technique.
I’ll politely disagree
Let’s reframe this:
- Manual computational photography. This is what you’re describing. Shoot the requisite images, locked off ideally, then work it through on a computer with separately purchased software.
- Real time in-camera computational photography. Job done for you.
Very different in terms of usability.
I think think it will become an *option*
Last edited:
