Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Picket-baiting loon of the week

BA dug their own grave as regards contracting in a company they knew were going to do this. They effectively offloaded any disputes that would follow wage cuts and 'restructuring' onto another group - and it's came back and bit the mass sacking fuckers on the arse. They got rid of 13 000 people in the last year as part of this smae process and more are to come, this follows BA's lead in attempting to casualise the whole heathrow workforce. And that we covered in some detail almost exactly a year ago.
 
kyser_soze said:
And anyone who thinks that BA has 'an easy time of it' clearly has no fucking idea of how the airline business runs.

Oh bollocks. BA has had one loss making year in the last 20+.
 
Short term I'd agree with that Sorry but long term BA have been on to a loser for a while economically. They haven't been as price-competitive as the cheap airlines taking advantage of sweetheart deals with airports etc for a while now, they've mostly been coasting on their luxury image. But a luxury image doesn't hold if you're 'the world's grounded airline', cos all the free booze in the world doesn't make up for a 48-hour wait at Heathrow.

You can't completely reinvent a multi-billion pound enterprise to compete in an ultra-cheap market you aren't set up for (they tried with their short-lived airline Go but sold it because it wasn't a 'core' asset) though without leaving yourself fatally open to competitors, which meant going budget was out.

So given that their market share is limited by their niche status, a niche which has been increasingly shown to be a rather smaller one than their current size would suit, they've been sqeezing the costs at the other end and doing their best to increase the margins by attacking their workforce. They can't touch the pilots, cos Balpa is a very tough union to crack (though Ryanair have been made very sure Balpa never got very far there).

So they go after the weaker types, Gate Gourmet merely being a relatively easy peripheral to farm out to the Swiss, then pressure from the outside so you don't look like the bad guy when they end up having to use strikebreaker tactics to produce the results you're pushing for as the monopoly contractor.

The calls in the Times to 'reform the seventies working practices' is pretty much a call to destroy their workforce's numbers and living standards to find the necessary reduction in margins to make the company small enough to fit it's niche. However, without looking into their accounts in more depth, it's still fairly easy to find potential savings, and more importantly potential space for growth within the company's niche which would not necessitate that kind of tactic.

It's the usual leftist stuff, of consulting the workforce to find cost cutting procedural measures, consulting both staff and customers to find out what they think would make the company attractive on a wider scale (staff almost always know), and cutting the head off the management structure. It's also the relatively simple trick of not getting bogged down in your 'core values' if those core values aren't going anywhere. BA is not dying because its workforce is a seventies style union ransoming unit, it's dying because it is being utterly outmanouvered by its opponents.
 
Rocket Romano said:
BA do need to get some managerial balls though
They get fucked over every summer. I don't think they've ever had a decent boss. Ayling and Eddington not up too much.
For the way they screw Ryanair and Easyjet, or tried to (read Simon Calders book) you'd think they'd have some sense, but clearly not.
Brand loyalty?

I think they've got balls, sadly they're the balls of a gangster styled bully.
They also screwed Laker and usual dirty tricks against Virgin, a contract maintenance scam has been hinted at, etc.
BA's brand loyalty is mainly from the crown, the govt, and the services.
 
have to say - i'm not surprised, but am slightly shocked at the blatantly bastard way that this GG company has behaved. also quite impressed by the unsually in-depth mirror reporting on the way that they had planned all this disruption, simply to save them a few quite by ruinin worker's lives, for at least a year. and of course its all perfectly legal.

what can the sacked workers/workers now facing 'downsizing' in BA and GG do?
 
Rocket Romano said:
Might be morally right but this is BA.

I got a leaflet yesterday from the local scum, which I hasten to add I binned, which said, and I quote



:mad: :rolleyes:


would encitement to racial hatred laws cover that sort of shite?
 
Go on, sack them all en masse - maybe then, Heathrow can be out of actions for weeks, months even!

Ronald Reagan sacking of 11,500 of 13,000 striking Air Traffic Controllers in the 80's caused a 20% reduction in passenger flights and no disruptions to freight. Unless I'm seriously underestimating what it takes to make a cucumber sandwich, I doubt it ...
 
Back
Top Bottom