Discussion in 'photography, graphics & art' started by editor, Dec 5, 2004.
Here is my first attempt
35mm film ilford 400 , scanned at snappy snaps
resized with Picasa
Is that Paris, and did you mean to post on the competition thread?
yep its paris
i put it on the wrong topic
I'm going to have to ask for my photograph to be removed as it is no longer hold the rights for it.
Thanks for voting and what not though, and thanks to ed' for hosting it on a very popular website
Does anyone know who came second in this comp:
You're now the new winner - congrats !
You did! http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2095038&postcount=158
Why did you give away the rights to your own photo??
I hope they gave you a lot of money!
Ive just noticed my name is down as winning twice, when in fact the link to the first entry is someone else's photo, and I didnt win that month
Couldn't find it at first, only could see this one:
But then spotted the webpage title is wrong on one of Paul Russell's. I've been sending the editor the new wins every few months, will include the correction next time.
A lot of great photos, well done you lot.
(Sold the rights to the national trust paul, for next to nowt)
Do I email Ed' with this month's winner then or does he do it......
Oi Ed, you reading this? What do I do?
Can someone send me the June and July winning pics please?
sent them to contact at urban75 dot com
I just looked in the gallerz for the first time. INcredible pictures! Reallz stunning work.
Need a big update, though, all I can see from 2005 is:
URBAN75 PHOTO COMPETITION LISTING
Feb 2005 Hair, ta daaaa! - tribal_princess
Jan 2005 Solitude Lady in Tiananmen Square
Photo winners gallery updated!
Great pics too
Big thanks to alef for the work!
I assume that the gallery copyright message saying all pics are (C) Urban 75 (none are labelled 'otherwise') is a mistake and that the photos are actually copyright of the photographer?
The first post in this thread explains it.
Winners' gallery has just been updated, now includes Snadge's lighthouse, Iemanja, and Robster:
Nice, thanks alef
Fame at last!
An a very evocative and purdy shot it is toooo.
*adds a downer>>>>
<<on snadge's shot...
is that supposed to be a joke(sic!)?
oh, yes, I just noticed that too... Haven't lots of photos been digitally enhanced? Not sure that needs to be there...
I don't agree with that either
Snadge won the competition and won it with everyone aware of what had been done to it.
oh i dont know, there is a difference between a little tweaking and making it look fantastic.
and no, they havent all been digitally enhanced, all my winning entries were 35mm film scanned in and no playing about (this may be why i havent won for ages)
<edited cos i ust realised you said 'lots of' not all. but my point stil stands>
What a brilliant way to start the day, browsing through the winner pics
(I don't like the digitally enhanced comment either, fwiw)
I'd like to report many of the above posts for using the Editor's real name in this thread.
Where do I report to?
whats your point??
neither do I but I suppose that's the way it goes.
I would be happy with digitally mastered, enhanced makes it sound as though there is stuff in the picture that has been added when there isn't.
yeas i spose thats true. maybe 'touched up' or something?
Separate names with a comma.