Photo competition: winners gallery!

[lobster]

Here is my first attempt
35mm film ilford 400 , scanned at snappy snaps
resized with Picasa

 

[alphaDelta]

Is that Paris, and did you mean to post on the competition thread?

 

[lobster]

yep its paris
i put it on the wrong topic

 

[Firky]

I'm going to have to ask for my photograph to be removed as it is no longer hold the rights for it.

Thanks for voting and what not though, and thanks to ed' for hosting it on a very popular website

 

[Firky]

Does anyone know who came second in this comp:

http://www.urban75.org/photos/comp/comp016.html

You're now the new winner - congrats !

 

[alef]

Does anyone know who came second in this comp:

http://www.urban75.org/photos/comp/comp016.html

You're now the new winner - congrats !

You did! http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2095038&postcount=158

 

[Paul Russell]

I'm going to have to ask for my photograph to be removed as it is no longer hold the rights for it.

Why did you give away the rights to your own photo??

I hope they gave you a lot of money!

 

[Barking_Mad]

Ive just noticed my name is down as winning twice, when in fact the link to the first entry is someone else's photo, and I didnt win that month

 

[alef]

Ive just noticed my name is down as winning twice, when in fact the link to the first entry is someone else's photo, and I didnt win that month

Couldn't find it at first, only could see this one:
http://www.urban75.org/photos/comp/comp018.html

But then spotted the webpage title is wrong on one of Paul Russell's. I've been sending the editor the new wins every few months, will include the correction next time.

 

[Jo/Joe]

A lot of great photos, well done you lot.

 

[Firky]

You did! http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2095038&postcount=158

Oh? Nevermind

(Sold the rights to the national trust paul, for next to nowt)

Do I email Ed' with this month's winner then or does he do it......

Oi Ed, you reading this? What do I do?

 

[editor]

Can someone send me the June and July winning pics please?

 

[Firky]

Can someone send me the June and July winning pics please?

sent them to contact at urban75 dot com

 

[D]

I just looked in the gallerz for the first time. INcredible pictures! Reallz stunning work.

 

[Soreenkid]

Need a big update, though, all I can see from 2005 is:

URBAN75 PHOTO COMPETITION LISTING

Feb 2005 Hair, ta daaaa! - tribal_princess
Jan 2005 Solitude Lady in Tiananmen Square

 

[editor]

Photo winners gallery updated!
Great pics too

Big thanks to alef for the work!

 

[paolo]

I assume that the gallery copyright message saying all pics are (C) Urban 75 (none are labelled 'otherwise') is a mistake and that the photos are actually copyright of the photographer?

 

[alef]

The first post in this thread explains it.

Note: I've left the urban75 copyright notice in as a precaution, but naturally I'm not claiming copyright! If anyone gets in touch regarding using the images, I'll obviously contact with the photographer

 

[alef]

Winners' gallery has just been updated, now includes Snadge's lighthouse, Iemanja, and Robster:
http://www.urban75.org/photos/comp/thumbs.html

 

[lighterthief]

Nice, thanks alef

 

[girasol]

Winners' gallery has just been updated, now includes Snadge's lighthouse, Iemanja, and Robster:
http://www.urban75.org/photos/comp/thumbs.html

Fame at last!

Thanks, alef!

 

[boskysquelch]

Fame at last!

Thanks, alef!

An a very evocative and purdy shot it is toooo.

*adds a downer>>>>

but wtf????

Note: this photo was digitally enhanced

<<on snadge's shot...

is that supposed to be a joke(sic!)?

 

[girasol]

An a very evocative and purdy shot it is toooo.

*adds a downer>>>>

but wtf????

<<on snadge's shot...

is that supposed to be a joke(sic!)?

thanks

oh, yes, I just noticed that too... Haven't lots of photos been digitally enhanced? Not sure that needs to be there...

 

[mauvais]

I don't agree with that either

Snadge won the competition and won it with everyone aware of what had been done to it.

 

[wiskey]

oh i dont know, there is a difference between a little tweaking and making it look fantastic.

and no, they havent all been digitally enhanced, all my winning entries were 35mm film scanned in and no playing about (this may be why i havent won for ages)

<edited cos i ust realised you said 'lots of' not all. but my point stil stands>

 

[Derian]

What a brilliant way to start the day, browsing through the winner pics



(I don't like the digitally enhanced comment either, fwiw)

 

[Minnie_the_Minx]

I'd like to report many of the above posts for using the Editor's real name in this thread.












Where do I report to?

 

[wiskey]

I'd like to report many of the above posts for using the Editor's real name in this thread.












Where do I report to?

whats your point??

 

[snadge]

neither do I but I suppose that's the way it goes.

I would be happy with digitally mastered, enhanced makes it sound as though there is stuff in the picture that has been added when there isn't.

 

[wiskey]

I would be happy with digitally mastered, enhanced makes it sound as though there is stuff in the picture that has been added when there isn't.

yeas i spose thats true. maybe 'touched up' or something?