poster342002
PROPER leftwing socialist
We take the principled position of being against the whole lot.Fisher_Gate said:And in the meantime? We allow thousands of christian schools to continue and oppose any new muslim ones?
We take the principled position of being against the whole lot.Fisher_Gate said:And in the meantime? We allow thousands of christian schools to continue and oppose any new muslim ones?
Well, I'd say bring them into the state system and force them to drop the religious element. All of them - whatever denomination.Fisher_Gate said:As well as thousands of christian schools by the way, there are also two CoE Universities (University of Gloucestershire and Roehampton University), and about 50 church colleges in both the FE and HE sector. All are publicly funded and regulated (to an extent), so the CPGB are wrong to say 'Bring the Church Schools into the State Sector' - they are already part of the state system but with important distinctions.
poster342002 said:We take the principled position of being against the whole lot.
poster342002 said:Well, I'd say bring them into the state system and force them to drop the religious element. All of them - whatever denomination.
TBH, I would not even enter an absurd, dead-end debate that can only end up with abandonment of principles to start with.Fisher_Gate said:Well bully for you. Now go and sit in front of a group of muslim parents and explain why they can't have any schools of their own, but the nearly 7,000 CofE and RC schools that their children are excluded from will be abolished come the revolution.
Two answers spring to mind...Fisher_Gate said:But if you are a local authority councillor or school governor in the here and now and a proposal for a muslim school to be state supported comes before you next week, you presumably turn it down until the glorious day when a secular state can be enacted in parliamentary legislation?
poster342002 said:Two answers spring to mind...
1 I would not wish to hold an establishment office to start with - be it cllr or MP. (yeah, yeah - whinging from the sidelines yadda yadda. Yawn).
2 If I was, I'd refuse to even enter such a dicussion (as my post above says).
I am actually only too aware of the "real world", having to deal on a daily basis with the crap it throws at working class people such as myself - which is probably more than a lot of middle-class pseudo-lefitists can say (though it won't stop them). Secondly, I don't subscribe to the notion of "something must be done. This is something, so let's do this".Fisher_Gate said:I feel duly humbled at your ability to ignore the real world that the rest of us have to inhabit. I'm glad you can sleep at night without worrying about whether something you could have done might make a difference.
poster342002 said:I am actually only too aware of the "real world", having to deal on a daily basis with the crap it throws at working class people such as myself - which is probably more than a lot of middle-class pseudo-lefitists can say (though it won't stop them). Secondly, I don't subscribe to the notion of "something must be done. This is something, so let's do this".
Kid_Eternity said:
Fisher_Gate said:Well bully for you. Now go and sit in front of a group of muslim parents and explain why they can't have any schools of their own, but the nearly 7,000 CofE and RC schools that their children are excluded from will be abolished come the revolution.

personally i think if i want to live in a country i must to a large extent accept the values of that country and yes integrate ...
Take the American south. Despite preaching segregation in his presidential campaign, the late South Carolina senator Strom Thurmond still slept with black women, like most white southern gentlemen. Black women breastfed and raised white children, and since most slave owners were not that wealthy, many black and white families shared the same roof.
The question was not whether the races could mix but what were the ground-rules for them mixing. These relationships were not consensual or mutual but usually coerced and one-sided. The whites-only signs kept African Americans from many a public place; but in the most intimate parts of their lives, black and white people were as integrated as they possibly could be.
In other words, the value of integration is contingent on whom you are asking to integrate, what you are asking them to integrate into and on what basis you are asking them to do so.
A Mori poll for Prospect magazine last year showed that 41% of whites, compared with 26% of ethnic minorities, want the races to live separately.
Britain has a great many qualities where race is concerned.
durruti02 said:so what is gary younges angle .. is he racist??
But he is a twat who appeals to the prejudice of white liberals who want to feel superior to the uneducated masses.
Oh OK then, he appeals to Lefter Liberals.cockneyrebel said:Some of the points in the linked article are valid, and he is better than a lot of liberal commentators. At least he talks about materical inequality and class.
tobyjug said:I am a bit puzzled by statement:- Racial ghettos may appear in Britain.
There have been racial ghettos for a long time now.
Johnny Canuck2 said:Maybe white people just didn't see them as being there.
Pickman's model said:these racial ghettos, tobyjug - d'you mean places like golders green and havering?
newbie said:which bits of London?
cockneyrebel said:Gary Younge makes the point that you never hear people talking about ghettoes when they're talking about all white areas.
Downham in Lewisham could well be described as a white ghetto, but never is.
cockneyrebel said:Gary Younge makes the point that you never hear people talking about ghettoes when they're talking about all white areas.
Downham in Lewisham could well be described as a white ghetto, but never is.
cockneyrebel said:Gary Younge makes the point that you never hear people talking about ghettoes when they're talking about all white areas.
Downham in Lewisham could well be described as a white ghetto, but never is.