untethered
For industry & decency
Well call me insane, but I'd have thought it more appropriate to check the extent of ones potential powers before campaigning on promises one may or may not be able to make good on.
True. Be prepared!
Well call me insane, but I'd have thought it more appropriate to check the extent of ones potential powers before campaigning on promises one may or may not be able to make good on.
To be honest they seem fairly harmless and still one step removed from the EDs.
No-one seems to have responded to my original point about a newly-elected mayor reviewing the work of his authority. Seems pretty reasonable behaviour to me.
It seems to me, untethered, that to most people white is an ethnicity. Therefore a party designed with the rights of the downtrodden white man in mind could be seen as an ethnic party.
Now the question is, given that Doncaster, according to wiki, is well over 90% white, does that mean that Diversity Officers and Translation Services are an underused waste of money, or a valuable link to social inclusion for the minority groups.
lol, it shows they are a bunch of k- who didnt know what they are running for. And who didnt thnk they had a chance in hell of getting to wherever it was.
The devil, as always, is in the details. If such services are helping people to integrate so that they can get to the point where they no longer need translation and similar services then they are probably defensible. If all they're doing is subsidising people that have no intention of making an effort to integrate then I'd say not.
I question your reference to "minority groups" in this context. Many people from ethnic minorities are quite capable of speaking English and organising their own affairs without taxpayer-funded "diversity initiatives" to supposedly assist them. How many non-white people do you know that can't speak reasonable English?
but they are old fashoned little englanders, village greens, warm beer, no darkies.

could we have a campaign to reclaim warm beer and village greens, cos I quite like those![]()
Could you trouble yourself to find a link to substantiate that claim?


First off, don't point out people's typos. It just makes you look like a nob, and it is rude didn't you know."Public culture" means the civic culture. That would include the political and legal systems, the established religion (if any), the language, etc. The aim, as with all societies, is to encourage social cohesion around core concepts concerning the public order.
According to the ED's manifesto, people can do privately what they choose. And as they seem to be the kind of people in favour of smaller rather than larger government, I'd say that would lead to more individual freedom (including cultural and religious freedom) rather than less.
Many people who have who have actually had the misfortune to meet the individual who is the New Mayor of Doncaster could tell you that on first impressions alone (and this is his public persona, so goodness knows what he is like in private!) he comes across as an arrogant, boorish, bigotted, chauvinist, saloon-bar-ranting, middle class-choleric-chippy git.![]()
Monday was Doncaster’s brand-spanking-new Mayor’s first day on the job, and his first engagement of the day was an interview with BBC Radio Sheffield’s Toby Foster. We hope Mayor Davies didn’t think he was in for an easy ride for his first official interview, because that’s not what he got.
We have just read the transcript of Peter Davies interview with BBC Radio Sheffield’s Toby Foster. Which you can read here @ The Welcome To The North blog. It could be described as ineptly hilarious, and probably will be by non-Doncaster residents, but the next 4 years of Davies’ mayoralty will heap more shame on Doncaster council and will be an even bigger disaster, for us who live here, than the whole of Winter’s three terms of office put together. Davies’ answers to the interviewer’s questions on his main electoral pledges can be summarised by this response, I dunno… again, I’ve got to find this out.
The new mayor made election pledges that he cannot fulfill. You may say that all politicians do , but his reasons are novel;
1. He didn’t check on the legality of any of his promises. Many are illegal and therefore impossible.
2. He didn’t think he could possibly be elected. His major concern at the count was saving his deposit.
So if you voted for him on the basis of his manifesto promises, I’m afraid you were not only stupid, but duped by a bloke who has no idea.

Just imagine what would happen if all the diversity officers went on strike!
about as much as this twonk would be able to achieve if he got elected?
TF: So what was the point of your manifesto? You might as well have said you were going to fly to the moon if you’re just going to say now that you can’t do it.


What integrity, he's going to work out whether or not he can keep the promises he made before he was elected while living on the bare pittance of £30 grand a year.TF: You did give a distinctive agenda, you’re absolutely right, you made some real points on that. Let’s just have a look - let’s have a look at them shall we? The first one of course I think’s an easy one - you’re going to cut the mayor’s salary.
PD: That’s the first thing this morning
TF: Down to £30,000 a year. Now, some people could look at that Peter and say, well, you get more than that for running a supermarket these days. Surely a council deserves… a bit more respect?
PD: No, the council deserves somebody who’s going to run it properly, and it deserves somebody who’s prepared to give their services partly free, in a sense - at one time all local government councillors did all the free, er, it’s become a gravy train and I’m not prepared to be part of that.

I'm looking forward to him mercilessly uprooting "these people who are, sort of, controlling thought processes and this sort of thing". Paul McKenna beware!