Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Papers Disprove Catastrophic Human-Induced Global Warming and Scientific “Consensus”

For fucks sake bigfish, the fucking sun warms the fucking surface, therefore the greenhouse effect on a planet does not violate the fucking second law of thermodynamics.
 
In all fairness, while it is clear bigfish doesn't understand how the laws of thermodynamics work in the context of the greenhouse effect, I don't either.

Hence I limit myself to asking simple questions, eg about the difference in temperatures between the Earth and the Moon, or why cloudless nights are colder than cloudy ones.

I also wonder why infrared radiation, alone out of the whole electromagnetic spectrum, should only move in a limited range of directions when emitted by a water vapour, CO2 or methane molecule. Is there some sort of force field acting as a constraint?
 
dash_two said:
I also wonder why infrared radiation, alone out of the whole electromagnetic spectrum, should only move in a limited range of directions when emitted by a water vapour, CO2 or methane molecule. Is there some sort of force field constraining it?

magic.

definitely magic.
 
"Izzy wizzy let's get busy!"

SOOTYWANDM.jpg
 
dash_two said:
I also wonder why infrared radiation, alone out of the whole electromagnetic spectrum, should only move in a limited range of directions when emitted by a water vapour, CO2 or methane molecule. Is there some sort of force field acting as a constraint?


?!

All EM radiation travels in straight lines unless it's acted on by something.
 
dash_two said:
I also wonder why infrared radiation, alone out of the whole electromagnetic spectrum, should only move in a limited range of directions when emitted by a water vapour, CO2 or methane molecule. Is there some sort of force field acting as a constraint?

What? :confused:

Damn, stdPikachu beat me.
 
goldenecitrone said:
Didn't you know that Einstein was one of 'them'? :eek:

Almost certainly. I await the 'Electromagnetism: the conspiracy unmasked!' thread with, er, what was it again? Oh yeah, 'mirth'. :D
 
Crispy said:
That's ok. The last big global warming megathread descended into a heated argument about the physics of the greenhouse effect, radiation, convection, insulation, absorbtion etc.

Lots of bollocks with little scientific basis being flung around in all directions. Tedious.

Our friend bigfish believes that

Oil is a mineral product, not organic, and it is being constantly replenished, so we will never run out
The sun has a solid surface and its behaviours are mostly electric, not nuclear

He appears to be a habitual contrarian and I don't take anything he says seriously.

I'm familiar with bigfishs crackpot rantings but WTF?!

Is there a thread on this? :D
 
In fact there is a very interesting answer to the question of why solar fusion is not like the fusion that occurs in H-bombs and the like, but it's not one that is to be found in the works of cranks and crackpots.
 
Back
Top Bottom