Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Panasonic DMC-LX3 digital compact looks good

FWIW I'm loving the interface on the Ricoh GR Digital - I'm assuming the GX200 has a similar set up?

That said the f2.0 lens on the LX3 sounds good too, but I'm guessing you have to be careful - before long you are hauling around a right old bag full of cameras... :)

Well apart from the fact I don't have money for all these aforementioned cameras - but you can dream - or dream of a compact camera with all of the above features... :)
 
Wooargh! Check out the photos this guy's taken with the LX3. Awesome.

391298897_npHcp-XL.jpg



http://www.laurencekimblog.com/index.php?link=110&cat=16

He is toting some external flash power too

I really wanted to try some off-camera flash, so I took along a 580exII, umbrella and a couple pocket wizards.

I think you'd get similar quality results with most compacts toting a hotshoe attachment.
 
FWIW I'm loving the interface on the Ricoh GR Digital - I'm assuming the GX200 has a similar set up?
The GX200 is very similar but with a few noticeable improvements.

The LX3 is nowhere near as robust as the Ricoh, but the quality is noticeably superior to the GX100, and there's a lot more power on hand too. The Ai auto-everything mode is really, really good.
 
I'm in the market for one of these now as an upgrade from a Canon G7, which is mostly very good. It is of course an addition to rather than a substitute for SLR kit.

Would I be right in thinking that the LX3 and Leica D-LUX 3 differ in that the Panasonic has two strap lugs (and therefore can be slung around the neck) whereas the Leica has only one?

The GX200 looks very attractive. I particularly like the "square" mode, giving 1:1 proportion shots. Does anyone know how this is implemented in the interface? Does it black out the other bits of the screen/viewfinder?
 
Would I be right in thinking that the LX3 and Leica D-LUX 3 differ in that the Panasonic has two strap lugs (and therefore can be slung around the neck) whereas the Leica has only one?
Leica tweak the software a bit but it's fundamentally the same camera expect they charge a ton more for it - and you get the round red badge to pose with.

After using both, I'd say that the LX3 is definitely a better camera when it comes to image quality, but the Ricoh GX200 feels far more rugged and has a slightly faster control system.

There's not a great deal in it though.
 
DPreview have just given the LX3 a massively positive review:

And then there's that lens. Image stabilized, 24mm at the wide end of things and offering an F2.0-2.8 maximum aperture range that gives you the choice of shooting at lower ISOs than its competitors. It's a feature that really sets the LX3 apart, even amongst cameras aimed at keen photographers and, as DSLRs become less expensive, that's exactly what this camera needed. The only concern must be that the lens only extends as far as 60mm equivalent. This is pretty short by most measures and may limit the cameras appeal, depending on your shooting needs (it's great as a walkaround landscape camera for instance).

Beyond all the good intentions of the specifications, it's a camera that appears to directly address many of its predecessor's shortcomings. Noise performance is greatly improved and the level of noise reduction is much less destructive (and you can shoot in RAW if you're the kind of person who has a prefered noise-reduction method in post-processing).

The joystick is a nice idea that should make for an excellent user-interface but it's a bit fiddly. The user experience just isn't quite a slick as it could be if you want to regularly change settings. Panasonic's own G1 shows that it's possible to give a superior level of manual control using a similar number of external controls (perhaps we should start asking for a control dial like the G1 if there's ever an LX4). That said, you do get used to the LX3 and it isn't completely fair to compare it to a camera aimed at a different set of users - it's still arguably more pleasant to use than any of its obvious competitors.

White balance isn't the LX3's strongest point but there's a good degree of control if you're consistently finding that it's not giving the results you want (Or, again, you can shoot in RAW and process in the software that is supplied with the camera). And in most other respects the images are very good - automatic correction of chromatic aberration and sensible (if rather saturated) image processing mean a lot of time spent with the LX3 is time spent thinking - 'Oh, I'm quite pleased with that.' And that's the bottom line - it's a camera that encourages you to play, to experiment, to take photographs and one that rewards you for doing so.

Highly Recommended
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmclx3/
 
Just ordered the following from CameraBox...

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 Black
£290

Samsonite Protector Case
£20

Silicon Power 8GB HC Class 6 High Speed SD Card
£25

CGAS005 Battery For Panasonic
£30

Bundle price: £340
 
Had my first play with it and all seems great apart from the fact it only has a puny 2.5x optical zoom. If you bring down the image size/quality that does go up to 4x but I'm still a little unimpressed with that.

Should I be?
 
Well, you should have known about the 'puny' zoom before you bought it!

The 24mm lens is a real asset and after taking a quick look at the photos taken over the walking weekend in Wales, I'm *very* impressed with the quality, which is SLR-like in some shots.
 
If you want a long zoom you're better off with something like the Canon G7/G9/G10, which do 35-200mm equivalent or so. You're sacrificing the wide end to get it, though.
 
Looking at the specs I get the idea that the LX3 is meant to be used like a sort of digicam substitute for a rangefinder. i.e. working fairly close to the subject in most cases (except for stuff like landscapes say)

It does look rather useful within those limits I have to say ...
 
Well, you should have known about the 'puny' zoom before you bought it!

Its not something that crossed my mind as I assumed it would have at least 4x.

Its just a bit of a shock as my other Lumix is the 10x zoom model.
 
Its not something that crossed my mind as I assumed it would have at least 4x.

Its just a bit of a shock as my other Lumix is the 10x zoom model.
You could probably send it back if you're quick but I'm amazed you didn't check beforehand!
 
Yes I am too now!

The camera does give you the option to crop, zoomed images which is one way around it and and the zoom does go up to 4x at lower image size.

Given the other features, I think i will stick with it. You obviously rate it very highly as does my mate who has one.
 
The camera does give you the option to crop, zoomed images which is one way around it and and the zoom does go up to 4x at lower image size.

Given the other features, I think i will stick with it. You obviously rate it very highly as does my mate who has one.
Some of the greatest photos in the world were taken on cameras with no zoom!
 
Missed most of his shots, probably.

The world of photography would be a very different place.

Rather than the decisive moment, we'd have had .75s after the decisive moment. A whole different aesthetic.

Bet he wishes he had face detection and red eye reduction.

And colour.
 
I think HCB would have been very frustrated with digital cameras. I remember my first digital camera in the days when there was a lot of shutter delay and trying to photograph some high-jumpers. Pressing the button as they cleared the bar just produce pictures of them hitting the mat. Cartier Bresson never even used an SLR because the slight delay as the mirror was raised which most of us never really were aware of would spoil his composition.

As for image recognition that would not be of any use in a manual focus camera of course. He could have used colour, it was invented before he was born but the magazines he worked for would have become too expensive if they had set up colour printing. According to Wikipedia he tried colour but was unsuccessful. Until the invention of Kodak Gold and other T grain colour 35mm films colour prints were very dull and lacking in contrast. He could have used colour slide film but the fast ones were much grainier than TriX and HP5 black and white film.
 
I've ordered one of these beauties. I didn't get round to testing it, so I'm relying on the many reviews I've read. Got a 16Gb Class 6 SD-HD card too :cool:
 
I was going to pop into John Lewis tomorrow morning and pick up one of them Crumpler cases. Doesn't need to be rainproof, since it'll be inside another bag usually.
 
Back
Top Bottom