dilute micro
esse quam videri
I really think this is one of those cases where it reflects more on the people who believe it than the person in question. 




It came out today that this was a prank done by a blogger. The blogger invented a fictitious 'consultant' who supposedly leaked the info about Palin. Then, MSNBC picked up the story and ran with it without sufficient fact checking, allegedly.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolo...africa-faux-pas/2008/11/14/1226318898086.html
so I reckon there might be some truth in it.
Except that the person who made it up, said that it was a prank, and that he made it up.
The coverage is being worded to make that seem like the case, but the guy's not claiming to have made up the story, only to have pretended to be the anonymous source for the Fox reporter who used the story.
"To be very clear, no, we were not the source for Carl Cameron and never spoke to him. We took credit for his anonymous sourcing. If they were going to be cowards, then we figured we may as well step in."
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser..._we_figured_we_may_as_well_step_in_100502.asp
The point is, there's no evidence that there's any truth in the allegation, no matter how much you'd like to believe that it is.
Of course there isn't - it came from an anonymous source within the McCain camp, which is what the prankster was playing on. Maybe tape of the debate prep exists but if it does I'm sure it's been buried deep in an Alaskan snowbank by now.
Fox News quoted an unnamed McCain campaign figure as saying Sarah Palin did not know Africa was a continent.
Who would say such a thing? On Monday the answer popped up on a blog and popped out of the mouth of David Shuster, an MSNBC anchor. "Turns out it was Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser, who has come forward today to identify himself as the source of the leaks," Shuster said.
Trouble is, Martin Eisenstadt doesn't exist
The prankster pretended to be the source, but admits he wasn't the source. I don't know how much clearer I can make it.
And here's her attempt at a rebuttal:
"I think if there are allegations based on questions or comments that I made in debate prep about Nafta or about the continent versus the country when we talk about Africa there, then those were taken out of context and that is cruel," she told reporters in her home state of Alaska.
She's still not looked it up![]()
He called up MSNBC or whoever and said "That anonymous source you're all wondering about for the Palin story? It's me, Martin Eisenstadt!".
On Monday the answer popped up on a blog and popped out of the mouth of David Shuster, an MSNBC anchor.
"Turns out it was Martin Eisenstadt, a McCain policy adviser, who has come forward today to identify himself as the source of the leaks,"
Shuster said.
UPDATE (scroll down for original post)…. MSNBC did a nice “Breaking News” piece on me with David Schuster interviewing my fellow pundits, “Republican strategist” Todd Boulanger and “Democratic strategist” David Goodfriend about my difficult decision to come clean as the source of the Africa story. MSNBC tried to reach me today for an on-camera interview as well, but I was traveling between DC and New York when the story aired. I certainly have my issues with NBC, and even Keith Olbermann’s used me as a source on several occasions, so at least it was nice that this time they gave me full attribution.
By now you’ve all heard the Fox News report last week that “unnamed” former McCain advisers leaked that Sarah Palin was confused about whether Africa was a continent, and which countries were in NAFTA. I was perfectly happy staying under the radar as an anonymous source for Fox News‘ Carl Cameron, but now that Palin has accused her accusers of being “unprofessional…jerks…cowards… taking things out of context, and then tried to spread something on national news” and begun to cast doubt on the Fox News report, maybe she’s right to a certain extent. For those of us on the McCain campaign who thought that she acted like a rogue diva and lost John the election, maybe we DO have a responsibility to come out in public. But Sarah… careful what you ask for: some of us may have more to reveal.
So yes, to be clear, last week I was the one who leaked those things to a producer at Fox News who works with Cameron.
From 'Martin Einstadt's' blog:
Dan Mirvish, who with Eitan Gorlin created an elaborate Internet hoax complete with a fake policy institute and a phony adviser to Senator John McCain.
An MSNBC spokesman, Jeremy Gaines, explained the network’s misstep by saying someone in the newsroom received the Palin item in an e-mail message from a colleague and assumed it had been checked out. “It had not been vetted,” he said. “It should not have made air.”
"To be very clear, no, we were not the source for Carl Cameron and never spoke to him.
.
I was the one who leaked those things to a producer at Fox News who works with Cameron.
The reason it shouldn't have made air, is because it came from Einstadt, and it was a hoax.
The item they're talking about isn't "Palin doesn't know about Africa," it's "Eisenstadt owns up to being GOP source behind Africa story."
"However, while MSNBC — which ran with Eisenstadt's story, along with The New Republic — has retracted the story (that Eisenstadt was the McCain camp leak), Fox News won't be retracting Carl Cameron's original report about the Palin/Africa flap, because it did not come from Eisenstadt."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/13/martin-eisenstadt-the-man_n_143547.html

If there continues to be a real, if anonymous source, then there is no need to retract the story.
p.s. I see you figure that you've got this sussed, and that some of the news agencies reporting the story, are in the dark.
Maybe you should right to them and set them straight.![]()
Skank?who gives a shit....i don't even want to talk about that skank anymore