Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Palestinians invade Israel

Why? Do you feel that my list doesn't accurately represent your posting pattern so far?

Other: 5
 
Bore you?

Whupped your arse more like. As I said, you won't last long :)

Ad Hominem: 12 (Tenuous I know)
 
nino_savatte said:
No, you just come out with ew historicised accounts that have no basis in fact.

Well then by all means enlighten me. I don't pretend to know the whole story.
 
PartTimePongo said:
You seemed to have ignored this bit of my post "hopefully no innocent casualities"
Nope, didn't ignore it.
Surely as a ex ARAB yourself (as indeed I am) you'd agree that one terrorist organisation killing members of another terrorist organisation can only be good for the safety of innocents eveywhere.
No, I wouldn't agree with anything that simplistic, because it's all dependent on the political, economic, social and individual bases of each particular case.

Agreeing with your point would be like agreeing with the old saw that "all coppers are bastards". Neither point is accurate. If they were life would certainly be simpler, no awkward grey areas.
 
bendeus said:
Looking after him are you, L&L? How terribly avuncular of you. :p

And naive.

I'd love for things to be as clear cut as "terrorist" and "innocent", but things are rarely that conveniently simple.

There's generally a thin dividing line between an "innocent", and someone who'd take up (illicit) arms and resist.
 
ViolentPanda said:
And naive.

I'd love for things to be as clear cut as "terrorist" and "innocent", but things are rarely that conveniently simple.

There's generally a thin dividing line between an "innocent", and someone who'd take up (illicit) arms and resist.

If you had ever taken the effort to actually read what I have always said you would know that that is exactly my point of view.
 
Back
Top Bottom