Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Our new friends

There are two things getting mixed up here:
1. A marxist view of class - a good thing, IMO
2. The personnel of the left - clearly unrepresentative of the w/c

If there's any confusion it's because you attempted to argue that the m/c dominance of the left is actually an acceptance of maxist class analysis.
 
I agree with the first part of this but I think the second has to be qualified. There might be some of the left that are like this, but the left (both in the UK and internationally) is hugely different from place to place and group to group. I think you're generalising way too much.

As a member of the left you would.
 
As a member of the left you would.

What so you think every organisation on the left, whether it's the SP, SWP, IWCA etc has a middle class membership and leadership? And you think that this also applies to the left internationally?
 
Of course there are, love. But class is the most influential, IMO, and most significant in termsof effecting social change

And try hard to concentrate here spion because it's important as to why the left is in the state it is, see how these other things play out in real life, becuse they're not just added extras, they have real effects, and one of them is the m/c dominance of left groups via the things i mentioned above - cultural capital, education, networking skills and contacts, time, money etc. And if these things come to dominate the leadership and memberhip of left groups (and they do) then w/c people won't and do not join them in significant numbers. There;'s no wat around that, you can't hide behind imoposing a common interst via marx. It;'s irrelevant.
 
And try hard to concentrate here spion because it's important as to why the left is in the state it is, see how these other things play out in real life, becuse they're not just added extras, they have real effects, and one of them is the m/c dominance of left groups via the things i mentioned above - cultural capital, education, networking skills and contacts, time, money etc. And if these things come to dominate the leadership and memberhip of left groups (and they do) then w/c people won't and do not join them in significant numbers. .
Thank god for your revelations, butchers. You truly guide us all
 
This . . .



equals this? . . .



You're fucked in the head, pal

I claimed there is ongoing m/c dominance of the left, you asked me where i'd experienced it, i told you. You said that you'd welcome more people adopting a marxist analysis of class - i. e people concentrating (almost exclusively it seems) on defintion of class that only allows for relationship of means of production, i.e that what i had experienced is just that. Simple really.
 
our next category is politics. First question:

class - essentially a cultural identity or an economic relationship?

bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Butchersapron, bristol poly! Your answer for 10 points:
 
And try hard to concentrate here spion because it's important as to why the left is in the state it is, see how these other things play out in real life, becuse they're not just added extras, they have real effects, and one of them is the m/c dominance of left groups via the things i mentioned above - cultural capital, education, networking skills and contacts, time, money etc. And if these things come to dominate the leadership and memberhip of left groups (and they do) then w/c people won't and do not join them in significant numbers. There's no way around that, you can't hide behind imoposing a common interst via marx. It's irrelevant.

That's all true actually.

But has spion really argued against that..? Or was it more of a throwaway comment...?
 
Well, you claim never to have seen m/c dominance of leadership of the left depsite being involved for decades. What is anyone with their eyes open to make of such a statement?

Can't speak for spion but as said are you saying every group is like this? And what about internationally? It might be the case for a few tiny groups in the UK but to make a sweeping statement about "the left" is totally over the top.

Butchersapron, bristol poly! Your answer for 10 points:

The left in the UK is too dominated by academics and students.
 
I claimed there is ongoing m/c dominance of the left, you asked me where i'd experienced it, i told you. You said that you'd welcome more people adopting a marxist analysis of class - i. e people concentrating (almost exclusively it seems) on defintion of class that only allows for relationship of means of production, i.e that what i had experienced is just that.
The 'it seems' is the admission you don't actually know what I think. You see me arguing for marxist fundamentals in the analysis of class and assume I don't believe there are other subordinate means of exercising power. Best to ask before assuming such rubbish really isn't it?
 
No wonder Uncle Joe ended up having everyone else on the left neckshot, endless quibbling about who said what and what terms mean :D
 
our next category is politics. First question:

class - essentially a cultural identity or an economic relationship?

bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Butchersapron, bristol poly! Your answer for 10 points:

It's essentially both you monkey. Establishing a real original prior essence doesn't mean anything. It's a game whereby you can invite ever more people with opposing interests (but who have the same long term interests) onboard and play happy families meanwhile ignoring the first step of actually meaning something to the 'real' w/c, the ones who can put us all in a postion so those differing interests don't matter, and the mdoel can become reality.

. The 2 class model is the death star of the approach.
 
Well, you claim never to have seen m/c dominance of leadership of the left depsite being involved for decades. What is anyone with their eyes open to make of such a statement?
Where did I claim that? Move away from the computer. Get some rest. You're fucking up left, right and centre on this thread
 
The 'it seems' is the admission you don't actually know what I think. You see me arguing for marxist fundamentals in the analysis of class and assume I don't believe there are other subordinate means of exercising power. Best to ask before assuming such rubbish really isn't it?

Then please, integrate your vulgar marxist understanding with your analysis of other power relations - actually make the 2nd lot mean something other than just something that you say rote.

And do you still insist that you've never seen m/c dominance of the leadership of the left in your 2 decades involvment. That's the proof of the pudding.
 
Where did I claim that? Move away from the computer. Get some rest. You're fucking up left, right and centre on this thread

You don't recgonise this phenomena then? The m/c in the left, who dominate the left ignoring other forms of social power in the name of marx? Why would they do that. Other forms of social power - education, cultural capital, experience, social function etc all helping them and all irrelavent in this approach, because marx said so (which he didn't).

No. Where have you experienced it? What was the circumstance? TBH, I'd be glad if there were more people expounding a marxist analysis of class.

Ok.
 
And do you still insist that you've never seen m/c dominance of the leadership of the left in your 2 decades involvment. That's the proof of the pudding.

And do you still insist that this is the case for the entire left?
 
Whats wrong with the left is that it sometimes seems its only academics and students.

Well parts of the left, who come out with stuff like:

Establishing a real original prior essence doesn't mean anything.

Which to most people indeed means nothing at all.

Next on the agenda. Praxis and post modernism in module 5.3.
 
I can't be bothered with this thread on the basis that what I've said has been completely and wilfully misinterpreted by some posters - eg ignoring the word "ALL" in the sentence "the middle class are not all propping them up", etc.
 
I can't be bothered with this thread on the basis that what I've said has been completely and wilfully misinterpreted by some posters - eg ignoring the word "ALL" in the sentence "the middle class are not all propping them up", etc.

it would have been better then if you had said a minority of the middle class are not propping them up . That may have led to a 'what is a middleclass job disscussion' and highly excited libarians
 
Back
Top Bottom