Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Khitan?Allegedly 800 pounds was spent on tips!
Khitan?Allegedly 800 pounds was spent on tips!
erm because you were chiding others for being emotive in the same post?
We have to be careful about distinguishing between what words signify on an emotive level, and what they actually mean if we dig into the facts.
Why ignore the islamic extremism element of it?

You're quite sure that all the examples of islamic activity and imposed behavior are just normal required parts of islam?Because it's not extremism that characterises this story. It's religious conservatism and accountability. A lot of the things that have gone on in these schools are things that went on in my Catholic school only a few years back. Teachers and pupils being forced out if they got pregnant outside marriage; a teacher who got forced out for being gay; anti-contraception talks in RE; school trips to Lourdes
That's not to say that if genuine extremism exists it shouldn't be challenged, it's just that this whole story is being presented as something it is not.
You're quite sure that all the examples of islamic activity and imposed behavior are just normal required parts of islam?
Swarthy was saying his wasn't overtly religious, for a Catholic school, and that's speaking as someone who would never, ever, send his son to a Catholic school. I think we "did" more religion in my non denominational primary school tbf.Well, mine was nothing like that at all. It was informed lessons on what happens, health aspects and debate about social aspects. The same as pretty much everywhere else. What sort of monsters do you think catholics are?
What a pointless swerve. If you are saying it's not extremism then you have some standard which they are in. Which means that this = normal islamic practice.What is required in any religion depends on which religious person you ask. The governors at these schools seemed to believe it is part of their religion. It's not my place to define their religion for them, but that version of it (or any other version) is not appropriate in schools.
It's just bog standard - kids tittering, teachers shitting it, diagrams rather than diaphragms. Same as everywhere else really.Swarthy was saying his wasn't overtly religious, for a Catholic school, and that's speaking as someone who would never, ever, send his son to a Catholic school. I think we "did" more religion in my non denominational primary school tbf.
What a pointless swerve. If you are saying it's not extremism then you have some standard which they are in. Which means that this = normal islamic practice.
So instead of doing the outraged liberal thing argue against both what happened here and what happened to you. It's pretty simple. You are giving a pass to one because of the other - and the fundies on both sides love it. They would hate you attacking them both instead of pointing to one or the other and asking but what about them. Why don't you do that?It is normal practice for some Muslims, and it isn't for others. As is the case with all religious conservatism. My objection is with the term 'extremist' when it is used to imply that these schools are practically training camps for terrorists. That's the subtext of the way in which this story has been reported, but it's not an accurate representation of the events.
Of course, if you want to define all religious fundamentalism as extremist, then what went on at these schools was extremist. But then it was also extremist for me, a non-catholic, to be forced to attend mass and say the Hail Mary.
It's the lack of consistency between how we treat one religion and another that bugs me.
So instead of doing the outraged liberal thing argue against both what happened here and what happened to you. It's pretty simple.
Well, you're not doing it very effectively given that you have manouvered yourself into arguing that what happened in brum is just normal islamic schooling and so they should crack on with it.That's exactly what I am doing. No religion has a place in any school. That's been the main thrust of everything I've said so far on this thread.
Well, you're not doing it very effectively given that you have manouvered yourself into arguing that what happened in brum is just normal islamic schooling and so they should crack on with it.
Above - at the start of our interaction.
That we should leave them alone until others have their houses in order = crack on with it until all things are equal.That they should just crack on with it? No. I didn't.
That we should leave them alone until others have their houses in order = crack on with it until all things are equal.
That's the subtext of the way in which this story has been reported, but it's not an accurate representation of the events.
.
I had thought that teachers might and that they and their organisations might use this opp to speak out about faith schools in general instead of effectively making a defence of the brum schools and what has gone on there. The wrecking ball of liberalism in full play. Being played like a fiddle from all sides.
ofsted is like when the landlord is coming round to do his bi-monthly inspection. You make sure everything is spick and span, everyone face forward and act natural.
Is a Muslim teachers' refusal to shake hands with an Ofsted inspector because she is female extremist or conservative (as per here http://www.theguardian.com/educatio...d-bare-after-birmingham-schools-allegations)?

I was thinking that - can't be the first time that's happened.A teachers' refusal to shake hands with an Ofsted inspector? Hands probably clenched behind their back trying desperately not to punch the bastard up the throat.
An investigation ordered by the government has found a "sustained, co-ordinated agenda to impose segregationist attitudes and practices of a hardline, politicised strain of Sunni Islam" on children in a number of Birmingham schools.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ols-inquiry-hardline-sunni-islam-trojan-horse
The inquiry, conducted by the former counterterrorism chief Peter Clarke, was ordered by the former education secretary Michael Gove and began in April. Clarke gathered 2,000 documents and generated 2,000 pages of interview transcripts from 50 witnesses, including former headteachers, teachers, council staff and school governors. He did not interview parents or pupils. "The level of distress and anxiety felt by the witnesses cannot be overstated," he says.