Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Operation Trojan Horse

What comes through most of all to me is the role of Ofsted. First of all some of these are highly rated schools that tick all the managerial boxes, followed by a lurch into full moral panic mode. Parallels with the Care Quality Commission - the majority of scandals in care homes are in the wake of 4 ticks in the boxes they use for their inspections. 'Quality' as a discourse, not a measure of whether anything is any fucking good.
 
ofsted is like when the landlord is coming round to do his bi-monthly inspection. You make sure everything is spick and span, everyone face forward and act natural.
 
erm because you were chiding others for being emotive in the same post?

I wasn't, but I assume you mean this:

We have to be careful about distinguishing between what words signify on an emotive level, and what they actually mean if we dig into the facts.

Which is not chiding anyone for being emotive. It's an appeal to look beyond the language used in the media, and assess this story in a way that ignores the deliberate framing of it as somehow linked to Islamic extremism.

As for science being the opposite of faith, science is about coming to conclusions based on evidence. Faith is about coming to conclusions regardless of the evidence. They are fundamentally opposite to each other.
 
Why ignore the islamic extremism element of it?

Because it's not extremism that characterises this story. It's religious conservatism and accountability. A lot of the things that have gone on in these schools are things that went on in my Catholic school only a few years back. Teachers and pupils being forced out if they got pregnant outside marriage; a teacher who got forced out for being gay; anti-contraception talks in RE; school trips to Lourdes :eek:

That's not to say that if genuine extremism exists it shouldn't be challenged, it's just that this whole story is being presented as something it is not.
 
Because it's not extremism that characterises this story. It's religious conservatism and accountability. A lot of the things that have gone on in these schools are things that went on in my Catholic school only a few years back. Teachers and pupils being forced out if they got pregnant outside marriage; a teacher who got forced out for being gay; anti-contraception talks in RE; school trips to Lourdes :eek:

That's not to say that if genuine extremism exists it shouldn't be challenged, it's just that this whole story is being presented as something it is not.
You're quite sure that all the examples of islamic activity and imposed behavior are just normal required parts of islam?
 
You're quite sure that all the examples of islamic activity and imposed behavior are just normal required parts of islam?

What is required in any religion depends on which religious person you ask. The governors at these schools seemed to believe it is part of their religion. It's not my place to define their religion for them, but that version of it (or any other version) is not appropriate in schools.
 
Well, mine was nothing like that at all. It was informed lessons on what happens, health aspects and debate about social aspects. The same as pretty much everywhere else. What sort of monsters do you think catholics are?
Swarthy was saying his wasn't overtly religious, for a Catholic school, and that's speaking as someone who would never, ever, send his son to a Catholic school. I think we "did" more religion in my non denominational primary school tbf.
 
What is required in any religion depends on which religious person you ask. The governors at these schools seemed to believe it is part of their religion. It's not my place to define their religion for them, but that version of it (or any other version) is not appropriate in schools.
What a pointless swerve. If you are saying it's not extremism then you have some standard which they are in. Which means that this = normal islamic practice.
 
Swarthy was saying his wasn't overtly religious, for a Catholic school, and that's speaking as someone who would never, ever, send his son to a Catholic school. I think we "did" more religion in my non denominational primary school tbf.
It's just bog standard - kids tittering, teachers shitting it, diagrams rather than diaphragms. Same as everywhere else really.
 
What a pointless swerve. If you are saying it's not extremism then you have some standard which they are in. Which means that this = normal islamic practice.

It is normal practice for some Muslims, and it isn't for others. As is the case with all religious conservatism. My objection is with the term 'extremist' when it is used to imply that these schools are practically training camps for terrorists. That's the subtext of the way in which this story has been reported, but it's not an accurate representation of the events.

Of course, if you want to define all religious fundamentalism as extremist, then what went on at these schools was extremist. But then it was also extremist for me, a non-catholic, to be forced to attend mass and say the Hail Mary.

It's the lack of consistency between how we treat one religion and another that bugs me.
 
It is normal practice for some Muslims, and it isn't for others. As is the case with all religious conservatism. My objection is with the term 'extremist' when it is used to imply that these schools are practically training camps for terrorists. That's the subtext of the way in which this story has been reported, but it's not an accurate representation of the events.

Of course, if you want to define all religious fundamentalism as extremist, then what went on at these schools was extremist. But then it was also extremist for me, a non-catholic, to be forced to attend mass and say the Hail Mary.

It's the lack of consistency between how we treat one religion and another that bugs me.
So instead of doing the outraged liberal thing argue against both what happened here and what happened to you. It's pretty simple. You are giving a pass to one because of the other - and the fundies on both sides love it. They would hate you attacking them both instead of pointing to one or the other and asking but what about them. Why don't you do that?
 
So instead of doing the outraged liberal thing argue against both what happened here and what happened to you. It's pretty simple.

That's exactly what I am doing. No religion has a place in any school. That's been the main thrust of everything I've said so far on this thread.
 
That's exactly what I am doing. No religion has a place in any school. That's been the main thrust of everything I've said so far on this thread.
Well, you're not doing it very effectively given that you have manouvered yourself into arguing that what happened in brum is just normal islamic schooling and so they should crack on with it.
 
A great starting point. Let down by your later posts where you bottled calling or even suggesting that extremism was behind this and that it is actually just the same as Catholic education. Now rather than going on to attack both you instead engaged in but what about themism.
 
Last edited:
I had thought that teachers might and that they and their organisations might use this opp to speak out about faith schools in general instead of effectively making a defence of the brum schools and what has gone on there. The wrecking ball of liberalism in full play. Being played like a fiddle from all sides.

Teachers in general aren't any more opposed to faith schools than the general population. As such nor are teachers' "organisations" (unions?).

Teachers generally (and their unions) are opposed to free schools and academies, because of pay and conditions issues, unqualified staff etc...

ofsted is like when the landlord is coming round to do his bi-monthly inspection. You make sure everything is spick and span, everyone face forward and act natural.

if only. More like the landlord wants to see documented evidence of every bit of housework you've done for three years, and proof you've got better at it. Except, all your washing up and laundry and housework equipment has a mind of its own, is entirely unpredictable, some of it is broken and it would all far rather be pissing about or asleep than doing the housework. [/tortured analogy]
 
Is a Muslim teachers' refusal to shake hands with an Ofsted inspector because she is female extremist or conservative (as per here http://www.theguardian.com/educatio...d-bare-after-birmingham-schools-allegations)?

I dunno about "conservative" or "extremist" but it is pretty fucking pathetic. Whatever super-natural guff you're into, refusing to engage in aspects of basic human interaction is just sad. Have to admit it didn't bring out the best in me when I experienced the rejected proffered hand at parents' evenings....especially when explained away with the "we don't do that" line.

Farage-style rant over now!:D
 
A teacher's refusal to shake hands with an Ofsted inspector? Hands probably clenched behind their back trying desperately not to punch the bastard up the throat.
 
Last edited:
The inquiry, conducted by the former counterterrorism chief Peter Clarke, was ordered by the former education secretary Michael Gove and began in April. Clarke gathered 2,000 documents and generated 2,000 pages of interview transcripts from 50 witnesses, including former headteachers, teachers, council staff and school governors. He did not interview parents or pupils. "The level of distress and anxiety felt by the witnesses cannot be overstated," he says.

Quite comprehensive too,
 
Back
Top Bottom