Sigmund Fraud
893 all the way.
If you didn't know what it is, there a ton of info here:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operaci%C3%B3n_Puerto_doping_case
Essentially the biggest doping case in professional sport ever uncovered, Puerto is the Spanish polices investigation of the infamous Doctor Fuentes and his numerous treatments, all of which relate to blood doping and the use of erythropoietin (EPO). Plainly put the good doctor had a almost completely undetectable racket going on and was charging a high price for his services.
Cycling has kopped the lions share of the flak. 56 pro cyclists were implicated, some coughed for it, some flatly denied involvement. Puerto meant the two favourites for last years tour de france (Jan Ullrich and Ivan Basso) were withdrawn from last years race; both were subsequently sacked from their teams. Ullrich retired earlier this year while Basso moved to fill Lance Armstrongs boots at Discovery Channel...only to resign last week when Puerto flared up again, admitting Fuentes had some of his blood in his lab.
The case clearly has legs yet and will rumble on and on, taking with it no doubt the credibility (if there was any left) of cycling and its biggest race, the tour de france. In the eyes of many, especially those with a casual interest in the sport, cycling is finished - not just because of Puerto but as the last nail in a rotten coffin.
There were initially reports of 200 athletes linked to Puerto but so far only cyclists have been implicated - there were rumours of tennis players, runners, F1 drivers and La Liga footballers also using Fuentes' 'services'...
So my question is this: do you think its just cycling and athletics that have a doping problem? These two sports crop up again and again whenever theres a discussion about drugs in sport; or do you think (as I do) that theres just too much money in professional sport for more sports not to be tempted to cheat and use drugs. How would you feel about your team/favourite sportsperson if you found out they were doping all along?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operaci%C3%B3n_Puerto_doping_case
Essentially the biggest doping case in professional sport ever uncovered, Puerto is the Spanish polices investigation of the infamous Doctor Fuentes and his numerous treatments, all of which relate to blood doping and the use of erythropoietin (EPO). Plainly put the good doctor had a almost completely undetectable racket going on and was charging a high price for his services.
Cycling has kopped the lions share of the flak. 56 pro cyclists were implicated, some coughed for it, some flatly denied involvement. Puerto meant the two favourites for last years tour de france (Jan Ullrich and Ivan Basso) were withdrawn from last years race; both were subsequently sacked from their teams. Ullrich retired earlier this year while Basso moved to fill Lance Armstrongs boots at Discovery Channel...only to resign last week when Puerto flared up again, admitting Fuentes had some of his blood in his lab.
The case clearly has legs yet and will rumble on and on, taking with it no doubt the credibility (if there was any left) of cycling and its biggest race, the tour de france. In the eyes of many, especially those with a casual interest in the sport, cycling is finished - not just because of Puerto but as the last nail in a rotten coffin.
There were initially reports of 200 athletes linked to Puerto but so far only cyclists have been implicated - there were rumours of tennis players, runners, F1 drivers and La Liga footballers also using Fuentes' 'services'...
So my question is this: do you think its just cycling and athletics that have a doping problem? These two sports crop up again and again whenever theres a discussion about drugs in sport; or do you think (as I do) that theres just too much money in professional sport for more sports not to be tempted to cheat and use drugs. How would you feel about your team/favourite sportsperson if you found out they were doping all along?

, ...yeah right.