Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Open Office v Microsoft Office

I also tried open office and went back to microsoft. I didn't use it for that long and I think that probably the only reason I changed back was because I was so used to word, excel etc - it was just easier for me and seemed more intuitive (but that's probably habit). I also think it looks nicer.

Are there any objective reasons why open office is crap? I kinda want to give it another go. Have people had trouble with the compatibility thing.or any other specific problems?
 
I also tried open office and went back to microsoft. I didn't use it for that long and I think that probably the only reason I changed back was because I was so used to word, excel etc - it was just easier for me and seemed more intuitive (but that's probably habit). I also think it looks nicer.

Are there any objective reasons why open office is crap? I kinda want to give it another go. Have people had trouble with the compatibility thing.or any other specific problems?

The only beefs I had with OO were that it was slow to start up and that it didn't have an equivalent to Picture Manager. So when somebody told me how easy it is to torrent the entire 07 Enterprise suite I switched back.
 
For WP I find them both bloated, Abiword does everything I need.

Open Office is fine for spreadsheets, if slow to load, don't use them much anyway.
 
I think the transitions things are a shit idea and make any presentation look amaturish.

Much better to just press the button and go to the next image than faff around with the picture disolving into the next one or whatever (but then I'm thinking about work/job interviews). Keep it simple.

Depends what you're using it for. We run rolling presentations on screen in the lobby that get built using ppt (it's there and it's cheap) - on those a subtle transistion etc... is well worthwhile.
 
The problem is not using the native formats and exporting to other formats as required. My son found that one out when he tried to work in word format in OOo on his Eee and lost all his course work. There are loads of free alternatives so maybe it would be a foolish to part with money for MS offerings. For word processing I use abiword.

Here are a few alternative word processors:

http://go-oo.org/
http://www.abisource.com/
http://www.jarte.com/

Being based on OOo, go-oo is possibly the way forward if you want a full blown office replacement :)
 
If you use office on your work PC your company might have microsoft volume licensing. One of the benefits of this is the home use program. We were able to get a full blown copy of MS office for £8.
 
If you use office on your work PC your company might have microsoft volume licensing. One of the benefits of this is the home use program. We were able to get a full blown copy of MS office for £8.

That is still £8 more than a free alternative. I was wondering if there is some sort of snob value in having to have MS office or any software that cost money?
 
I was wondering if there is some sort of snob value in having to have MS office or any software that cost money?

If you have a valid license you generally get better support and access to regular updates. Plus you're helping the developer keep going which is always good.

In the Office stakes I find iWork to be quite good on the Mac. I can put together a interesting presentation much faster in Keynote. On Ubuntu I generally use Abiword / Gnumeric, unless it's some corporate communication from on high. Then Crossover Office runs Microsoft Office 2003 really well...
 
If you have a valid license you generally get better support and access to regular updates. Plus you're helping the developer keep going which is always good.

In the Office stakes I find iWork to be quite good on the Mac. I can put together a interesting presentation much faster in Keynote. On Ubuntu I generally use Abiword / Gnumeric, unless it's some corporate communication from on high. Then Crossover Office runs Microsoft Office 2003 really well...

Who is really interested in support or updates? Maybe system administrator justifying their jobs? As a user I have never had to consider either option except when forced upon me by the OS or software update function. Or worse when my employer decided to update their computer equipment because the back room boys could no longer play current games on the ageing hardware :D
 
People who depend on the software for some reason...

Like in fly by wire, some medical applications where equipment connected to patient? In the real world I doubt if support is an issue especially with office applications. Networking is the only thing that comes to mind that might cause minor problems, it so easy now for a novice especially in Linux to set up a network and get real time free support on a forum somewhere. It took me twenty minutes to set up a home wireless network so we could all access a single printer :)

Which o/s are you using that forces you to upgrade...? :confused:

You did not need to ask as we all know which os has ott update system. Also ubuntu has a nasty habit of hitting you with upgrades including bits of open office on occasion. I know what you are going to say next, turn it off or decline the option requests etc... :D
 
Like in fly by wire, some medical applications where equipment connected to patient? In the real world I doubt if support is an issue especially with office applications.

I was thinking of more mundane applications that become mission critical to someone's workflow. In the real business world people don't have the luxury of spending time looking on forums for solutions. They want them yesterday.

I know what you are going to say next, turn it off or decline the option requests etc... :D

Well quite.
 
I was thinking of more mundane applications that become mission critical to someone's workflow. In the real business world people don't have the luxury of spending time looking on forums for solutions. They want them yesterday.



Well quite.

We are talking office applications I hope :) If so the problem is more likely to be a lack of understanding or job training than a real support problem. Forum solutions only take a few minutes with google. I am talking about Ubuntu & Puppy Linux not sure about the dark murky world of ms and online support :)
 
I think I preferred Wordworth on my Amiga best if I'm honest.

I wrote all my University assignments with that. Worked well saving to rtf and taking them into the library on a PC formatted 720k disk. It was very annoying having to load it off 4 disks though (I couldn't afford a hard disk at the time).I also had XCAD2000 which exported dxf perfectly so I could work on my AutoCAD drawings at home. :cool:
 
If you have a valid license you generally get better support and access to regular updates. Plus you're helping the developer keep going which is always good.

Unlicensed copies of MS Office get all the legit updates. Even when they are detected by the MS anti-piracy tool.
 
I was thinking of more mundane applications that become mission critical to someone's workflow. In the real business world people don't have the luxury of spending time looking on forums for solutions. They want them yesterday.



Well quite.

He speaks the truth. FWIW I've never found a decent replacement for Office.
 
I've never heard of OO having any particular trouble with large documents, and 1155K is not large anyway.

Depends on the computer you use... At work we do most of our stuff on single-core Dells (for various good reasons) and OO is an absolute nightmare, even with pretty small files.
 
Office 2007 has several key problems that means it's a pile of overdeveloped poo.

It's file formats are sooo bad. I've had dozens of users lose work because 2007 doesn't work properly with 2003 formats. Outlook is unwieldy and clunky and many plugins have caused serious headaches in excel.

We used to use OO to 'fix' files broken by office 2007! That doesn't mean OO is better though.

I currently use iworks on a mac for general stuff and it's great. Fully compatible with office 2003 and 2007 (moreso that office 2007 is!)
 
We used to do that before Office 2007 and it's xml goodness. Never have problems like this with 2007!

We regularly have files saved in 2003 format from 07 that simply won't open in 07 but will open in OO. Kids doing their work at home and bringing it into school so it could be the way they're saving it I spose.
 
OpenOffice 3 works well for me for occasional docs, spreadsheets & presentations. So what if it doesn't support all the spangly stuff for presentations - any presentations that use lots of "cool" transitions generally have bugger all to say ...
 
TBH, I'm so used to Word and Excel that it's hard to wean myself off them. OO's a bit disappointing and unfamiliar, as are Apple's iwork equivalents

Powerpoint is however fucking predictably shit; an eyelid closer of a program with every presentation. It's worth investing in Keynote if you're a mac user, or even learning a bit of Indesign/Quark if you do presentations regularly
 
Yep, nothing worse than someone reading a load of bulletpoints which you could have read yourself in half the time. Powerpoint presentations are often the equivalent of someone reading your email out loud to you really slowly.
 
Yep, nothing worse than someone reading a load of bulletpoints which you could have read yourself in half the time. Powerpoint presentations are often the equivalent of someone reading your email out loud to you really slowly.

That's the twat giving the pres then rather than the software - although I guess it's made people lazy.

Depends how you use it. Bit like anything else when it comes to presentations I spose - and it does have other uses tbh.
 
Back
Top Bottom