Top Dog
Well-Known Member
oh... dear...charlie mowbray said:Quite a difference between that and being a complete wuss by rolling over and letting the Trots walk over you,though, isn't it?![]()

oh... dear...charlie mowbray said:Quite a difference between that and being a complete wuss by rolling over and letting the Trots walk over you,though, isn't it?![]()

Que?charlie mowbray said:Quite a difference between that and being a complete wuss by rolling over and letting the Trots walk over you,though, isn't it?![]()

Que?charlie mowbray said:especially when you start getting jittery!!
but all you've done so far is a bit of name callingcharlie mowbray said:Oh, and not inaccurate, I believe.

Originally Posted by free spirit
'because until bob geldof caused edinburgh council to shit themselves by calling for a million people to head to the g8 they had no plans to run a campsite'
Utter bollocks, the council were planning to provide camping in Niddrie long before Geldof called for anything.

free spirit said:I wasn't. I must admit i'd not known about the history of TAZ as stated here,
then that's a loose enough definition to be meaningless. What "autonomous" often means a sense of liberty devoid of social content, independence rather than freedom; personalistic, atomised; the sort of liberty that sits very well under capitalism since it doesn't offer any real challenge as either a concept or practice. Bey discounts any possibility of social revolution in Temporary Autonomous Zone.by the people for the people, with the minimum of involvement form the authorities
or are you saying that only facists are capable of organising TAZ's? or that anyone organising a TAZ must be a facist...
You didn't imagine the campsite, but the idea that the campsite was somehow separate from the capitalist society we live in, autonomous from it, that's fantasy, yes.ok i'll admit it, I imagined it all![]()
catch said:You didn't imagine the campsite, but the idea that the campsite was somehow separate from the capitalist society we live in, autonomous from it, that's fantasy, yes.
I'm not quite sure i agree with you, but in any case this wasn't what I or Dissent were advocating, we were merely wanting to create a safe self managed space for people to come to for the period of the G8 protests.and a dangerous fantasy at that, the state would love it if all libertarian minded people took themselves of to a "self organised commune" or whatever...
My thoughts exactly Sovietpop, the government deliberately put the G8 in the most inaccessible place possible in the belief that this would stop people being able to protest, yet we (and I don't just mean Dissent) managed to get thousands of people up there protesting and forcing them to have to bring in reinforcements via chinook helicopters to protect the meeting.And I was thinking about this afterwards, and it occurred to me, that in the
context of years and years (decades?) of defeats, any success, no matter how minor or insignificant would be seized upon, publicised and gloried in.
And the only success I can think of was the G8 protests. Now I can understand that it is not the kind of social struggle that people want, that it was transient, perhaps periperhal etc etc, yet within its own (perhaps limited terms) it did succeed.
So I just think it is weird, that so much time and enegry is spent running it down, as if summit protests were the problem. They aren't.
I've got absolutely nothing to get jittery about ( in your dreams)Top Dog said:Que?
![]()
but all you've done so far is a bit of name calling![]()
...you never did get round to answer any of the points i made several posts back. But if you wanna revisit the whole boring subject fine by me...
You never know, it might mean you get a long overdue 'open' letter of resignation. Then we might see who gets jittery![]()
charlie mowbray said:I s'pose Jack "Cock" Upton will make a big deal about it , though.

jackwupton said:Because, of course, selling a paedophiles literature isn't a big deal.![]()