I love the fact that people still think that anti discrimination law is worth a toss.
Firstly unless veganism or vegetarianism is covered in one of the pieces of legislation outlined above (religion, gender sexual orientation etc) a claim for discrimination could not be taken out. Even the most committed anti discrimination lawyer would be pushing thing a bit to say that eating meat is a belief which should be protected in legislation, although to be fair I have had many a bacon butty which I thought was divine.
Secondly in nearly all of the discrimination legislation there is a reasonability element, for example the ACAS guidance for the Employment Equality (age) Regulations 2006 states
“It is not unlawful to discriminate on the grounds of age if:
• there is an objective justification for treating people differently – for example, it might be necessary to fix a maximum age for the recruitment or promotion of employees.”
http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1841
This kind of wishy washy, completely contradicting the whole ethos of the legislation bull shit is in nearly all anti-discrimination legislation.
Therefore I would argue that it is objectively justifiable to advertise for non-meat eaters in this case and it would therefore be “legal” to do so
I’ve just spent an hour trying to think of an indirect discrimination situation (it’s been a very slow day) and therefore don’t have the energy to get into the moral aspect of discrimination against us omnivores.
We know it’s bad for us, we know it’s bad for the planet but we really, really love gravy.