One of the great movies on today!

[HarrisonSlade]

No you're not - no one is.

I am well within my rights to give opinions without you (or anybody else) implying that I am, personally, a racist or a paedo.

 

[HarrisonSlade]

i thought it was a poor film ultimately, but this has nothing to do with KIngsley failing in his duties to be a perfect facsimile for Ghandhi.

I thought that it did. We agree to differ on that front.

 

[butchersapron]

Nonsense post from a slander prone dickhead.

No, production companies would not have put money up for an unknown quantity.

And you can't judge the mannerism to be false without having expericed the genuine ones.

Hold it together now harry.

 

[butchersapron]

I am well within my rights to give opinions without you (or anybody else) implying that I am, personally, a racist or a paedo.

Not if you put forward arguments that verge on racism (or that deliberately, if clumsily try to play the line) you're not. I can make any criticisms i like of your posts - that's the flip side of you being able to make them. As you tried to argue on your muslim thread,

 

[HarrisonSlade]

No, production companies would not have put money up for an unkown quantity.

And you can't judge the mannerism to be false without having expericed the genuine ones.

Hold it together now harry.

I just felt that Ben Kingsley seemed to have something of the comedy Indian in him. Maybe I'm wrong. But maybe what I saw was a white man blacked up, putting on an accent.

If this was acurate then fine, but it put me off.

 

[Dubversion]

jiggajigga's gonna love this - he wasn't best pleased that I didn't much like the film. A nonsense criticism of the inauthenticity of the leading man'll go down a treat

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Not if you put foreward arguments that verge on racism you're not. I can make any criticisms i like of your posts - that's the flip side of you being able to make them. As you tried to argue on your muslim thread,

So, you can imply that I'm a paedo then? I ask this now. Because you have yet to apologise for making that claim.

 

[Dubversion]

Slade - if you'd have picked on Olivier's Othello, i'd have been with you actually. Played him like a 'Mind Your Language' Asian busdriver, and they seemed to 'blue him up'.

but not here.

 

[butchersapron]

I just felt that Ben Kingsley seemed to have something of the comedy Indian in him. Maybe I'm wrong. But maybe what I saw was a white man blacked up, putting on an accent.

If this was acurate then fine, but it put me off.

...and so you blamed the jews.

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Slade - if you'd have picked on Olivier's Othello, i'd have been with you actually. Played him like a 'Mind Your Language' Asian busdriver, and they seemed to 'blue him up'.

but not here.

Larry plays every role with Spike Milliganesque quality. Completely over rated, but fun to watch. With Gandhi, I wanted to see a film noting something of importance against the British Empire. And I get that.

 

[butchersapron]

So, you can imply that I'm a paedo then? I ask this now. Because you have yet to apologise for making that claim.

Made no such claim, you reported it and you reported it, you kicked up a fuss and you kicked up a fuss - nothing doing. I even walked you through it step by step. The mods told you to get lost, i'm telling you to as well.

 

[HarrisonSlade]

...and so you blamed the jews.

I blamed the Jews on what? I mentioned that Ben Kingsley had a semite look, and that Gandhi didn't. I said that it as one thing. To imply "blaming the jews" is to say that I am an anti semite, and that is just as sick as your implication that I'm a paedo.

Please explain both. You lied on one, and you have twisted the words on this one.

 

[butchersapron]

What's a semite look? Big conk?

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Made no such claim, you reported it and you reported it, you kicked up a fuss and you kicked up a fuss - nothing doing. I even walked you through it step by step. The mods told you to get lost, i'm telling you to as well.

You said that I said that I was going to give some kids "a good seeing to". I asked you to show me where I said that. You couldn't so you didn't answer. Your response was to my question to why you asked me when the last time I signed the sex offenders register.

The fact was that you lied about something that I had printed so that you could justify your slanderous "sex offenders" comment. And the fact that the mods backed you up does not look good on them.

 

[butchersapron]

You said that I said that I was going to give some kids "a good seeing to". I asked you to show me where I said that. You couldn't so you didn't answer. Your response was to my question to why you asked me when the last time I signed the sex offenders register.

The fact was that you lied about something that I had printed so that you could justify your slanderous "sex offenders" comment.

That's not even close to being a slightly correct chronological account of what happened never mind of the substance. Why do you even bother? Really?

 

[HarrisonSlade]

That's not even close to being a slightly correct chronological account of what happened never mind of the substance. Why do you even bother? Really?

Then tell me now, without lying, or mentioning anything I didn't say (as you did) why I should be on a sex offenders register.

 

[butchersapron]

I said no such thing. Maybe you think you should be. You can't even remember what happend can you? How drunk *are* you?

 

[HarrisonSlade]

I said no such thing. Maybe you think you should be. You can't even remember what happend can you? How drunk *are* you?

I just did. Tell us some more about the fermale muslim 'whore' bulls.

Are you currently signing the sex offenders register? If not, then you have nothing to moan about. You suggested a future possible scenario where these kids were in golders green and about to get a seeing to by you, i imagined my own future matching scenario? What's your problem? Do you own the future or something?

What did this post mean?

 

[butchersapron]

What did this post mean?

I just did. Tell us some more about the fermale muslim 'whore' bulls.

Are you currently signing the sex offenders register? If not, then you have nothing to moan about. You suggested a future possible scenario where these kids were in golders green and about to get a seeing to by you, i imagined my own future matching scenario? What's your problem? Do you own the future or something?

Good lord, this was a post explaining to you where your original idiot misunderstanding came from - and was based, as anyone who can read can see, on you not currently signing or needing to sign the sex offender register - not on you needing to sign it. Look, your complaint got binned. Maybe because you didn't understand what was actually going on.

This is why he wasn't on a wind up earlier - he's just too thick and dull.

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Good lord, this was a post explaining to you where your original idiot misunderstanding came from - and was based, as anyone who can read can see, on you not currently signing or needing to sign the sex offender register - not on you needing to sign it. Look, your complaint got binned. Maybe because you didn't understand what was actually going on.

This is why he wasn't on a wind up earlier - he's just too thick and dull.

Why didn't these kids go and practice their hobby in an Ozzie army base, and then try and fuck with anyone who dared to confront them then?

No need to answer that question. I'm sure i'll meet these cunts in Golders Green sooner or later, to ask them myself.

Bigoted, white Australian skater kids with an attitude problem? I'm sure they will find themselves to Golders Green in time. Sharing a house with Kiwis and white Sut Afreecans.

There is nothing in these posts to suggest that I would be willing to give "these kids a good seeing to". There was nothing to provoke you into the sick response you gave. The last quote was obviously an ignorant suggestion that GG is full of white colonials, but in no way something that could provoke the offensive slanderous comment you aimed at me, and that the editor found fit to just let you get away with.

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Please explain why you suggested that I was willing to give these kids a "good seeing to"?

And if the editor of this site can have the decency to explain why my grievance against this point, maybe he will do so now.

 

[butchersapron]

Fucking hell, that's your script of the damned is it?

Don't let it get under your skin or anything though eh?

 

[butchersapron]

Please explain why you suggested that I was willing to give these kids a "good seeing to"?

And if the editor of this site can have the decency to explain why my grievance against this point, maybe he will do so now.

Gotobed harry

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Fucking hell, that's your script of the damned is it?

Don't let it get under your skin or anything though eh?

Answer the question. Why did you say that I had said that I was going to give these kids a "good seeing to"? And why did you respond to these posts with the idea that I was on some kind of sex offenders register?

 

[butchersapron]

dum de dum de dum dum dum

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Gotobed harry

If someone put it around that you were a paedophile by adding a comment that you never actually made, would you let it drop?

 

[butchersapron]

If i were too thick to understand what happened i think i'd be best advised to, yes.

 

[HarrisonSlade]

If i were too thick to understand what happened i think i'd be best advised to, yes.

I am asking politely. Please tell me why these three posts, the first three I posted onto that thread, had prompted you into saying "on your way to signing the sex offenders register"?

 

[butchersapron]

Report the post again harry. Go on. I've explained to you already - weeks ago. Demand that the editor do something and the mods owe you and all this crap all over again if you like. That's it from me on this my little munchkin.

 

[HarrisonSlade]

Report the post again harry. Go on. I've explained to you already - weeks ago. Demand that the editor do something and the mods owe you and all this crap all over again if you like. That's it from me on this my little munchkin.

You explained, I agree, but you did so with a comment that I had said that I was going to give the "kids a good seeing to".

This was from your mind, not mine. I never actually said it, yet you used this as your explaination. After that you just came up with posts saying that you had already explained (with a lie).