Lord Camomile
Yipchaa!
Right! As soon as this essay is done I'm going back to watch th OT! I'm not letting all you people get ahead of me in the astute observations stakes 





Lord Camomile said:Right! As soon as this essay is done I'm going back to watch th OT! I'm not letting all you people get ahead of me in the astute observations stakes
![]()
)Yes, it's in either Empire or Jedi, but he's talking about Vader killing Anakin. Luke is all pissed because Obi-Wan told him Vader killed his father but Vader's just told him that he is his father, so Luke goes to Obi-Wan and says "what's all this about then??" and Obi-Wan says that what he told Luke was the truth, "from a certain point of view".bouncer_the_dog said:I think Palpatine has quite a good point about perception of the force being based on a point of view. Doesn't Obi Wan make a reference to points of view in ep.Iv (ill have to check, maybe its at the end of empire).
)
Sidious boasts this point to Yoda, during their Duel in Ep3. He said something along the lines of he will become more powerful than you or I. Palps, just like Yoda, meditates to scan the force checking on possible future events. The difference is that Palpatine's dominion is the Dark Side, something Yoda had trouble penetrating.fubert said:it's also pretty safe to suggest that palpatine knew what anakin could potentially become, after the "we will watch your career very closely" comment in i.
DarthSydodyas said:I'm going to see this film again, tonite. This time, I'm taking my brother-in-law with me. He has only seen Episode 1 and 2, and is one of the few people who has not seen the original triologies.
DarthSydodyas said:What bothers me is exactly why did Anakin/Vader remain inline with Sidious...?
If he did become more powerful, why did Vader not rise and remove his Master, in the age-old Sith tradition..?
DarthSydodyas said:Sidious boasts this point to Yoda, during their Duel in Ep3. He said something along the lines of he will become more powerful than you or I. Palps, just like Yoda, meditates to scan the force checking on possible future events. The difference is that Palpatine's dominion is the Dark Side, something Yoda had trouble penetrating.
What bothers me is exactly why did Anakin/Vader remain inline with Sidious...?
If he did become more powerful, why did Vader not rise and remove his Master, in the age-old Sith tradition..?
I'm going to see this film again, tonite. This time, I'm taking my brother-in-law with me. He has only seen Episode 1 and 2, and is one of the few people who has not seen the original triologies.
Kid_Eternity said:I kinda thought that was Vader subconciously looking for a way out, he wanted Luke to help but couldn't bring himself to face what he had become.

Sidious had backstabbed his master, and knew wot went around came around. It seems to be the way of the Sith. Yes, Vader was limited by his suit, but I got the feeling, from that Vader line, there was more to their relationship. I was expecting the Emperor to be much much more powerful (or at least demonstrate this). If not being more powerful (i.e. knowledgable), then perhaps having some other control over him - like his suit needing some kind of sustance that the emperor could withdraw with a mere thought.the B said:Sidious was wise to the fact he might get 'backstabbed' by Vader... probably took a lot of precautions. After all, Vader is stuck in a suit that keeps him alive given to him by Sidious. He could do all kinds of crazy stuff with that kind of 'leash'.
DarthSydodyas said:Vader never found out about Luke's true identity in the films, but I think it was between Ep4-5 where a rebel is captured and the identity of the guy responsible for destroying DS1 is revealed (skywalker).



Yes. That was shite. (forehead got slapped for that one too)TheLostProphet said:I have one major problem with EIII.
"...she's lost the will to live..."
I can't remember if I've already posted this (Derren Brown is on so must rushTheLostProphet said:(did anyone else suspect that Grievous was the reincarnation of Darth Maul...? Just me hoping for that tie-in to make the Obi Wan v Grievous battle have a bit of oomph to it?)
) but I never thought Lucas should have killed off Maul in Ep I. Darth Maul should have remained Sideous' apprentice until Anakin started muscling in on his place, then they have it out in a big-ass battle with Anakin taking Maul's place as the new apprentice. Would have had great Luke/Vader undertones and everything!!

sipotential said:Ive seen the RED-NECK version of star wars ???
It ends with the line
" luke i am your father, and your uncle "


I would like to Imagine him not in it atallTheLostProphet Imagine a Renton
think off Dusting HofmanKeanu Reeves school of woodcarving/acting

Indeed- the politics of chapter three are fascinating, the killing of the sepratists and Padme's political change following a disillusionment with a democracy which has been over-run by imperalismFridgeMagnet said:Packed with "war on terror" metaphors. "Only the Sith deal in absolutes"... just before that, I was convinced Anakin was going to say "if you're not with me you're against me", but instead he says "if you're not with me... (long pause) you're an enemy" which is just a cop-out. The Emperor and AnakinVader constantly talking about maintaining peace by conflict is significant too. A leader coming under an attack he inspires himself and using that as a chance to gain complete control....
Mind you - that could just be that TWAT is an expression of classic truths about human popular imperialist movements, and the film is just expressing that cliche. I've not got a lot of confidence that there's any depth in the overall storyline. Not given the clunking dialogue, sorry.


Anakin kills the Emperor in the final episode- the prophesy is true and it is he and not Luke who, 'brings balance to the force' and renounces the dark sideKid Eternity said:If he did become more powerful, why did Vader not rise and remove his Master, in the age-old Sith tradition..?
