JWH said:
A BMX track is more accessible than cycle track racing because ... lots of people ride BMXs and you can buy them cheap at enthusiast level! That's just not the case for track cycling.
£275 buys you this
track ready, nothing needed other than a helmet.
heres a link for a shop that sells them. If £275 is too much you can at present hire a track bike along with two hours track time and coaching for £15. The new velodrome will have similar hiring arrangements in place.
so is £275 'enthusiast' level enough for you?
JWH said:
...they're busy among a small number of people, not popular, which is different. There's a remote controlled car track in Crystal Palace that's very busy but it's not a popular sport.
I suppose its popular when you decide its popular eh? Whats your threshhold number for deciding when its a suitable time to build new facilites? Do you indeed have any clue what you're talking about? If you saw the public meetings when Herne Hill was locked out or read the south london press or indded if you've
ever visited Herne Hill recently you'd understand how you're coming across as an clueless, opinionated, bleating stuck record on this subject,
JWH said:
There's already a mountain bike track in that part of London and it's being demolished for the olympics.
For the last fucking time it is
NOT being demolsihed for the olympics, it is being cleared to make way for the East London Velodpark which will encorporate a new MTB track, BMX track, 1.5 km road circuit and velodrome - all of which was planned before the olympic bid was announced.
but...did you oppose the building of the original Eastway circuit as well? Come on, lets have some consistency from you on this, the original eastway was built on green space with GLC (Taxpayers!!!) money - were you against it too?