Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Olmert facing fresh calls to resign

Why should you think I'm not reading his posts? He makes claims. It's by reading other people's posts that I come to the conclusion that he's not the only one making claims. Your reply to me doesn't seem to reflect what I was saying. :confused:

Without wanting to repeat myself, you need to read his claims.

My reply to you more than adequately acknowledged what you were saying.
 
Garfield, you are one strange person. Always woith conspiracies. First you imagine that the Home Office will be knocking on your door because I (and one other poster) said that you admire HAMAS, and now you accuse Malamud of dual IDs. Just relax, please.

Nino, if you read 500,000, you read an erroneous article. As for Kadima, no, it is just the way things are in Israel and that is terrible. Yes, Sharon's son is in prison right now for campaign contributions in a case similar to Olmert's. However, that does not negate the worthiness of the Kadima Platform. Centrism is soemthing we have needed in Israel for a long time. The Mapai/Likud nonsense was making our political scene stagnant and it became more about grabbing for power than solving our biggest problems, the biggest of which is the "Palestinian" nationalism problem.

Kadima was formed out of a Likud faction , orchestrated by Sharon, because Sharon did what was sorely needed...he recognised that demographically we could not hope to retain Gaza and all of the "WB" and that we would either have to annex them and lose our Zionist character, or cede them and let them dow hat they will. Since he could not find an able Arab partner for dialogue he decided on a unilateral pullout. Withdraw, build a Barrier high enough to withstand rocks and human bobms, and lock the door behind us. IF the Arabs could EVER produce an able leader, we would open the door and possibly one day disassemble the Barrier.

As it is, mostly with foreign intervention a la Quartet, we are able to now negotiate with the Arabs via the PA under President Abbas so that we no longer need to rely on unilateral action.

Just because some of its membership is corrupt, that does not negate the worthiness of the Kadima value system.
 
Like I said, the figure of $500,000 was seen in more than one source. It would seem that you have a problem grasping that.

I know where Kadimah came from and, tbh, they're just another, more corrupt, version of Likud.
 
Rach has problems grasping reality.

or hold of facts...

points of refference...

telling the truth....

backing down when proved to be a liar...

or simply fucking the fuck off and dying...

His reality grasp frankly is the least of his worries...

maybe that's how he ended up with children...

rach's wife: did we have sex?
rach: no of course not i was merely trimming your lady garden in to a public topary sculputure.
rw: but you said brace yourself
r: i didn't you can't find any proof i did whatsoever, besides you hate all true bloods like me whore of babylon.
rw: you'd better have worn a condom i'm getting a promotion soon and don't want a baby.
r: that's right you anti semite bitch you try and kill the chosen people...

I mean bath times must be fun not to mention sunday lunch eh???
 
Of course and we aren't likely to ever get a source for his contention from him. But what about the rest of Kadimah? It sounds to me like they're full of corrupt, greedy bastards. it's enough to make your average Irish Fianna Fail TD blush with embarassment. :D

Nothing could ever have made Charlie Haughey blush!
 
You're quite taken by me aren't you phil? Am I your new target for trolling? Whats the matter-lesbian thread not going well?

Poor old Granny. Tıme for a nıce lıe down dearıe? Cup of tea? Or your usual treble G and T to gıve you the courage to contınue your lıttle hate campaıgn?

Wanker.
 
That seems to me to be the whole Middle-Eastern problem in a nut-shell. The protagonists are so totally polarised as to make none of the their claims and counter claims ever reconcilable.

Indeed. Basıcally ıt's lıke Northern Ireland: unless you happen to be a partızan by bırth, ıt ıs sımpy ımpossıble to decıde objectıvely between the two sıdes.

What *ıs* ınterestıng however ıs to study the motıvatıons of those not ınvolved by bırth who choose to get ınvolved anyway. And one doesn't have to dıg very deep to fınd plaın old antı-semıtısm promınent among those motıves, as thıs and other threads on here make very plaın.
 
Indeed. Basıcally ıt's lıke Northern Ireland: unless you happen to be a partızan by bırth, ıt ıs sımpy ımpossıble to decıde objectıvely between the two sıdes.

What *ıs* ınterestıng however ıs to study the motıvatıons of those not ınvolved by bırth who choose to get ınvolved anyway. And one doesn't have to dıg very deep to fınd plaın old antı-semıtısm promınent among those motıves, as thıs and other threads on here make very plaın.

I am quite prepared to accept that the intensity of feeling on behalf of the Palestinians is fueled by the cruelty suffered for so long by that people and needs no anti-semitism to motivate it.
Regrettably that kind of intensity leads to blindness when examining the other side’s position.
 
I am quite prepared to accept that the intensity of feeling on behalf of the Palestinians is fueled by the cruelty suffered for so long by that people and needs no anti-semitism to motivate it.

But surely you would also accept that crıtıcısm of the state of Israel provıdes an extremely convenıent smokescreen behınd whıch antı-semıtes often hıde to vent theır spleen?
 
But surely you would also accept that crıtıcısm of the state of Israel provıdes an extremely convenıent smokescreen behınd whıch antı-semıtes often hıde to vent theır spleen?

Absolutely.

But surely you would accept that criticism of the state of Israel is often labelled as antisemitic in order to close down the debate?

Equally do you also accept that those who support Israel in some cases often refer to the holocaust in order to justify its actions and existence?
 
Gafield: If you thought the topiary nonsense was going to make me angry you are wasting your time. After 24 years in the Service that crap is weak. anyway, one day you will learn that facts are alot more fun that pseudo sexual fantasies of the fetish type, well maybe not but I pray you do.

Malamud: I would be quite interested to hear what cruelties you feel the "Palestinians" have suffered being that they were not only offered their own nation on the same day we were, but were offered 70% of the total landmass. I will not read the litany of offers and refusals but fair to say that while I would offer that they HAVE suffered but only because of their own unwillingness to demand able leadership and to live in peaceful coexistence, as well as their fellow Arabs using them as pawns, I would NOT blame Israel for their predicament.

Israel did not refuse "Palestine," "Palestinians" did that and then insisted on terrorism as a means to an end.

Phil: Yes, many people holding anti-Jeiwsh views do criticise Israel under the guise of Political Correctness. And look, even Grannie got one right, people DO shut down constructive discussions by claiming anti-Jewishness...although in my experience the latter happens much, much less than the former.

Granny: As for the Holocaust being used and manipulated, um , yeah we have read that book and there is a reason why Norman Finkelstein is discredited as an academic. That should be your first clue that there problems with that being anything more than an extremely rare abberation. Like the b.s. about a Jewish Lobby being responsible for America's sorry image in the Mid-East. It is built on shoddy academic research.

How would Israel manipulate the Holocaust? For money as Neo-Nazis say? Reperations are awarded based on the amount LIVING, not the amount dead so that is counter-intuitive. Unlike you, I would be glad to hear what you have to say on it.
 
Granny: As for the Holocaust being used and manipulated, um , yeah we have read that book and there is a reason why Norman Finkelstein is discredited as an academic. That should be your first clue that there problems with that being anything more than an extremely rare abberation. Like the b.s. about a Jewish Lobby being responsible for America's sorry image in the Mid-East. It is built on shoddy academic research.

Oh and the Roma never suffered during the Holocaust? As for Finkelstein, we only have your word that he is "discredited".
 
As for Finkelstein, we only have your word that he is "discredited".
Indeed. And as with most of his words, it's absolute bollocks. It's noticable Rach doesn't ever mention Finkelstein's main antagonists, Peters and Dershowitz, who truly represent the essence of the word 'discredited'
 
Granny: As for the Holocaust being used and manipulated, um , yeah we have read that book and there is a reason why Norman Finkelstein is discredited as an academic. That should be your first clue that there problems with that being anything more than an extremely rare abberation. Like the b.s. about a Jewish Lobby being responsible for America's sorry image in the Mid-East. It is built on shoddy academic research.

How would Israel manipulate the Holocaust? For money as Neo-Nazis say? Reperations are awarded based on the amount LIVING, not the amount dead so that is counter-intuitive. Unlike you, I would be glad to hear what you have to say on it.

Thats all very interesting (well almost) but did I even mention Finklestein? :confused:
 
Indeed. And as with most of his words, it's absolute bollocks. It's noticable Rach doesn't ever mention Finkelstein's main antagonists, Peters and Dershowitz, who truly represent the essence of the word 'discredited'

Rach tends to cite Dershowitz as some sort of towering academic authority. Pity for him that he's nothing more than some hotshot criminal lawyer.
 
Nino: "Roma never suffered during the Holocaust?": Did I say that? It seems bizarre that you would just post that out of nowhere. First off, yes, Roma DID suffer along with Jews and many other demographics in the Camps but Jews suffered the most losses by far. I should also add that more Sinti than Romas suffered and that while the two groups are similar in their origina and practices there ARE differences, and it would seem strange to introduce the subject of the tragedy that befell Travelling People without mentioning the group that lived in Germany, the Sinti.

"As for Finkelstein...": No, you have much more thamn my word. His employer DePaul University fired him. I would offer that about closes the case to most people given that he was fired for academic incompetence.

"Primary, how conveinent.": I do not understand what you are trying to get at. If Olmert is not incarcerated and I do not see that happening to any sitting of former PM in Israel ever, as I said we look at financial crimes a bit differently than most nations plus it would be inconceivable that anyone in the justice system would seek the incerceration, why should he not TRY and maintain, or retain his position within the Party?

Actually, it would be inconveinet because only morons and synchophants would vote for him to retain even party membership. If I am home (I am a Kadima member and former Organiser) I will vote to bounce him out on his ear IF they allow anything near that as an option. It is not his financial improprieties that bother me as much as his mishandling of the last war.

Our Reserve Depots, where Reservists reporting for deployment are supposed to pick up filed gear and weaponry were usually in terrible condition, and while it is not directly his fault, Reservists' training regimens were made woefully inadequate in the last 7 years due to budgetary constraints within the military. I see that, and Arik is just as much remiss (more so given his vast expereince in the military establishment but he is not fit to pay for that mistake), as a crime worthy of a long incarceration (as harsh it may seem I think execution would be fitting since it truly endangered our entire nation because of the shirking of responsibility).

Olmert is not facing a very bright political future.

Spion: Please research the issue before jumping on the insult boat. DePaul FIRED him.

Grandma: Yes, I know you did not mention Finkelstein but you did mention manipulation of the Holocaust and the main proponenet of that nonsense is Finkelstein whose book was recently published on that very issue. The man is a sad person indeed. People often use the term "Self Hating Jew" much too casually but I see Finkelstein, as much as an armchair analysis is valid, as the epitome of that phrase.

Nino (AGAIN): I cite Dershowitz? I respect the man. He is a genius in his academic field. He also knows what he is talking about when he involves himself in terms of Jewish and Israeli issues. However, I have never cited him, nor do I reply on him to form my own opinions. Dershowitz was instrumental in DePaul taking what action it did but only because Dershowitz motivated enough academics to act on the issue and offer their opinion. DePaul could not ignore the issue in the face of such an outpouring of criticism.

As I told Phil in another thread, I do not feel that academics should be penalised for their personal views but like some other academics (I was mentioning Massad to Phil), Finkelstein misused his position to further his own purient interests, in addition to his academic fraud,etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom