FridgeMagnet
Administrator
FM seems to be largely ignoring my arguments - as they are sound - in favour of quoting less robust comments. Coincidence? Yeah, say it again.
The CIA paid me off.
FM seems to be largely ignoring my arguments - as they are sound - in favour of quoting less robust comments. Coincidence? Yeah, say it again.
So it's good in situation X and bad in situation Y. What it isn't is simultaneously good and bad.
You saying my comments aren't robust?
Whereas my argument is that KFC is demonstrably shite, but tastes brilliant.
Sometimes it tastes brilliant and is therefore good regardless of making you fat. Sometimes it is just horrible greasy cock and is therefore bad. What it never is is both good and bad.
For clarity you're saying "I am wrong", correct?
Nope, I'm saying that you are wrong in your assumption that a subjective position taken by an individual somehow has an effect on the absolute condition of something. That you are wrong in your assumption that something as subjective has film actually has an absolute condition, that it can either be "good" or "bad" and that the individuals perception of such somehow creates this condition in their own mind. That a person can only have one view of something, that it is either "Liked" and therfore "Good" or "Disliked" and therfore ""Bad". In fact I reject entirely your overly simplistic view of all of this, your "black or white" approach and suggest to you that the world truly is shades of grey and that this fact bothers you, makes you feel on unsafe ground, makes you wish the world truly was binary.
Your mum smells good but also bad.
Your mum smells good but also bad.
