Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Oasis vs Blur

Oasis or Blur?


  • Total voters
    86
Anyway, Blur managed to stay relevant throughout their whole career. And they'd win just for Alex going on TOTP at the height of the Oasis vs Blur thing, coked up to the eyeballs, looking smug as fuck wearing an Oasis tshirt.

When they were on TOTP doing, There's No Other Way I think, Dave Balfe gave them some acid a while before they went on. I guess in a way of passing the tripping on TOTP baton from the Teardrop Explodes.
 
I think you might have missed the point of that song tbh. The fact that Alex James is aware enough of how ironic his current lifestyle is to name the concluding chapter of his autobiography after that track redeems him in my eyes.

It's not as bad as Parklife. Hateful fucking song.
Alex James has an autobiography?
 
When they were on TOTP doing, There's No Other Way I think, Dave Balfe gave them some acid a while before they went on. I guess in a way of passing the tripping on TOTP baton from the Teardrop Explodes.
Every 'cool' band on TOTP is on acid. It totally undermines it with its coolness. Except NMA, who were, of course, on smack.
 
Debates about who had more class-credentials are meaningless - it's the music that matters. I don't give a fuck who drank in Goldsmith's bar or who came from Burnage.

I like both bands, but Oasis are a bit of a one-trick pony and there's far more variety and depth in Blur's music.
 
Debates about who had more class-credentials are meaningless - it's the music that matters. I don't give a fuck who drank in Goldsmith's bar or who came from Burnage.

I like both bands, but Oasis are a bit of a one-trick pony and there's far more variety and depth in Blur's music.

I agree, now.

Back then, Oasis meant more, thats all.
 
No they're not they are the point. How else may we decide? On your subjective say-so?

No, on their music, which is their purpose. They're bands. Their poses, however valid, as Burnage boys/Goldsmith's students might attract interest but ultimately they are judged on their music.
 
Says who?

Says me, and those who judge bands on their music, unless anyone would like to judge them on their education, accents, haircuts, posturing, clothing, girlfriends, birthplace, upbringing (and whether or not they met Tony Blair :eek::eek: which was quite a big issue in 1997!):D ;)
 
For me it's a comparison of their peak output. Parklife is a genuinely very good album that I still like, much better than the singles from it, mainly due to the variety in it and ability to be successful away from obvious pop. What have Oasis got that matches that?
 
For me it's a comparison of their peak output. Parklife is a genuinely very good album that I still like, much better than the singles from it, mainly due to the variety in it and ability to be successful away from obvious pop. What have Oasis got that matches that?
So what you are saying is that you like that one best and you challenge anyone to say that you don't or that they prefer an Oasis LP more than you like that one?
 
It's got to be Oasis. I'm not what you'd call a fan, and a couple of Blur songs mean something to me, but really, there's no comparison. (Definitely Maybe is my favourite album btw).
 
It means so what you are saying is that you like that one best and you challenge anyone to say that you don't or that they prefer an Oasis LP more than you like that one?
 
It means: so what you are saying is, that you like that one best, and you challenge anyone to say that you don't, or that they prefer an Oasis LP more than you like that one?

apols for the arabic
 
Back
Top Bottom