peppery said:
That Mohammed, he's a saint, so he can't possibly be a nonce, can he?
Now this Blair twat is REALLY pissing me off!!
- Thread starter jiggajagga
- Start date
That Mohammed, he's a saint, so he can't possibly be a nonce, can he?
audiotech
wav, aiff, mp3, ogg, flac
Lock&Light said:You really shouldn't sit on the fence like that!
That fence in the background looks tempting.
© Paul Ross 2002.
http://www.caliach.com/paulr/news/polltax/index.html
peppery said:
Don't be so silly. Can't you stand response?
Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Lock&Light said:
That L+L he's a swell guy, he can't possibly be hated by most of humanity can he?
(sorry couldn't resist!
)peppery said:
As children are at risk I and my wife have no alternative but to go to the police. The council also needs to be informed as they have obligations under the 1996 housing act.
I make no apology for taking action against a drug user who has become a problem. (There is a vast difference between having a problem and being a problem).
Better watch yourself peppery. The Orange hued one does have a tendency to report posts he finds not to his liking. Bit of an arse licker if you ask me matepeppery said:
Streak of piss? I reckon the squirmy tangerine could be doing with a decent wash if his photograph is anything to go by
jiggajagga
Judge_Mental
tobyjug said:
I agree entirely toby but you have still not answered the initial question, which is;
" If the 'drug user who has become a problem" is a tennant, the government is saying they would wish to 'instantly evict'.
Would there be any difference if the 'drug user with a problem' was a house owner?
If yes then there is one law for a citizen and one for another in future Blairworld. Can that be just and democratic Tobyjug?
gosub
~#
The switch away from habeus corpus to corpus juris has been alledged by EUskeptics for a while and been dismised as a myth.
Had some russian clients over last year who were shocked at the amount of survallience the average brit has to put up with on a day to day basis- so much so that in their haste to leave they almost accidently killed Jeremy Clarkson but I digress.
Presuming this goes ahead can one assume that in the interest of justice the accused [will that still be the correct word?] shall be given legal powers to collect CCTV footage, have full access to state collected data and the like so as to be able to defend themselves against the charge?
Blair tried to justify this affront to what is essentially a core of British identity on the basis that at present a police officer sees someone throwing a brick through someones window they are reluctant to persue there inquiries due to the large amount of paper work they would have to fill out. WHY DON'T THEY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PAPERWORK INSTEAD? - perhaps because this government's reaction to being confronted by too much beauracracy is to create a quango.
Had some russian clients over last year who were shocked at the amount of survallience the average brit has to put up with on a day to day basis- so much so that in their haste to leave they almost accidently killed Jeremy Clarkson but I digress.
Presuming this goes ahead can one assume that in the interest of justice the accused [will that still be the correct word?] shall be given legal powers to collect CCTV footage, have full access to state collected data and the like so as to be able to defend themselves against the charge?
Blair tried to justify this affront to what is essentially a core of British identity on the basis that at present a police officer sees someone throwing a brick through someones window they are reluctant to persue there inquiries due to the large amount of paper work they would have to fill out. WHY DON'T THEY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PAPERWORK INSTEAD? - perhaps because this government's reaction to being confronted by too much beauracracy is to create a quango.
tobyjug said:
well, yes - battered silver tankards and Dumpys Rusty Nuts albums aren't easy to replace.
tobyjug said:
i'm laughing at you, toby. that's all.
Maidmarian
Stubborn Socialist
It gets worse !! 
After Composite 8 (housing) was passed by Conference, he`s taken the liberty of rescinding it !!!
After Composite 8 (housing) was passed by Conference, he`s taken the liberty of rescinding it !!!
GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
well accordin gto these new laws proposed you wouldn't need to do that jsut post up the addres and i'm sure i coudl get at least 30 peopel to confirm that you have a drug problem which is causing local issue... then the judge dreds can come along and deal with you there and then .... if you don't respect the law you miserabte then they just might take you up on the offer... post yer address up then so we can hand it in to the polis now liketobyjug said:
GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
but tobes under the proposed law you monkey they is no need ofr burden of proof except by the accused party to prove they are innocent you see ...tobyjug said:
GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
aye but you see we aren't terrible good at desent in this country and so if oyu give us you address now then we can jsut hand it over when the law does come out after all you can prove you are innocent right...tobyjug said:
GarfieldLeChat said:
The original message in this thread said caught using drugs. Current law (1996 housing act) already allows councils to evict convicted drug users from council housing. In fact as the landlord a council is obliged by law not to let drug use knowingly happen in property they own.
The same legal obligation applies to householders and parents.
GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
no tobes i'm suggesting we simply just report you for being a public nuscense and deranged clearly incapable of looking after yourself and a danger to the public at large you are like a manga version of victor meldrew...tobyjug said:
GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
sorry toby is that a veild threat there...tobyjug said:
your a big man but you're an old bastard tobes now sit down before you do yourself and injury eh?
Similar threads
