Now it's an "occupancy tax" for single people's homes

[poster342002]

The only thing you 'knocked down' - without any proof beyond your seemingly limited 'opinion' was a fantasy in your own head. Come on poster - what issues have you been 'campaigning' on recently???

Whatever.

Tell you what, why not visit a working class housing estate and wave around placards with "Higher Bills NOW! Tax Single Working People Harder! Make The Poor Pay!" on them, and see what reaction you get? After all, at least it's "doing something"...

 

[belboid]

They could probably reintroduce the polltax now if they put a green gloss on it - and the left would not say a peep.

you really do speak some moronic crap at times. get over your bitterness and you might achieve something.

 

[belboid]

The 'left ate my hamster'.

 

[treelover]

Just because a group doesn't have many members, etc, doesnt mean it can't be influential: I know of people around the country who are aware of the IWCA and consider their ideas, etc relevant and often inspiring. Anyway, after all Karl had to start somewhere too didn;t he?

Ohh fuck - another IWCA 'cheerleader'. If the IWCA had as many active members as they had talk the talk cheerleaders - like you - they might be able to achieve something. If you understood that the IWCA are serious in the points they make about certain tendencies among certain groups who claim to be on the left you might not make thier ideas look so foolish by your own purile half-digested version of thier arguements.

They are a very small and localised (in terms of influence) group. I don't think they would disagree with these points. Do you seriously believe that the thousands of other 'lefts' working day in and day out with and among working class communities on the issues affecting those communities (some of which I have mentioned above) can simply be dismissed by yet another completely superficial, unproven 'the left are no longer class based' comment by a internet 'class warrior' like you you fool?

 

[dennisr]

Just because a group doesn't have many members, etc, doesnt mean it can't be influential: I know of people around the country who are aware of the IWCA and consider their ideas, etc relevant and often inspiring. Anyway, after all Karl had to start somewhere too didn;t he?

If you actually read what I said - I am not in any way attacking the IWCA - for christ's sake - is there something in the water making you all go do-lally today???

The post was simply saying that 'poster whatever the name is' is just using the IWCA as:

a) a cover for not explaining his answers to his unsubstanciated opinion on some generic catch all 'left' - basicly a straw man he has set up (poorly....) to knock down.

and

b) a cover for the fact that this 'campaigner' offers no positive alternative to this supposed 'left' s/he is talking about - in fact s/he probably does feck all 'campaigning' his/herself for the working class communities s/he about but is happy to sit on a bulletin board spouting bollocks about and condemning people who do actually get of thier arses. (This is now clear from the fact that poster cannot even answer the simple question SO WHAT DO YOU DO? despite being asked more than once). Another feckin poser talking the talk but now actually walking the walk - something I imagine genuine IWCA supporters would be the first to point out...

is that clear now??????

 

[dennisr]

I know of people around the country...?

and... I know people around the country who don't DO fuck all - but are happy to sit around condemning others and I am getting a bit sick of listening to the crap - so i have pulled one of the ejets up on it only to watch the ejet flounce off

 

[dennisr]

at least it's "doing something"...

unlike you - are you depressed? - its just you sound it