
neonwilderness said:
GuerillaPhoto said:some from yesterdays shoot in the studio
Model - Me
lighting - me
focusing - me
shutter pressing - Tom lol
Yeah I agree with you about it being a bit busy on the left, I was on my way home from work when I took this so it was a bit rushed. I'm planning to go back with a tripod and torch (I nearly ended up in the river trying to get a better anglefirky said:Smart! Can't help but think there's too much of the structure on the left - making it heavy, I'd of included a bit more to the right - but that is me. I like it though. Stands out on this thread for me.
) to try this again and maybe find some different angles.
Stanley Edwards said:That place has changed loads since I lived in the area. If it wasn't for the M&S give away that last shot could be anywhere in Western Europe other than London.

e19896 said:here i begin the campaign against primate change a return back to who we were and our earth..[/QUOTE]
Err..whatever.
Boring, I'm afraid. They lack any compostional interest.
IMO, of course.
cybertect said:Messing about near the river...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
They were called Ents. I can see the similarity too.Iemanja said:I'm not a big fan of Lord of the Rings but I remember the walking trees, did they have a name? That photo reminds me of them.
Pie 1 said:Err..whatever.
Boring, I'm afraid. They lack any compostional interest.
IMO, of course.
e19896 said:you miss the humour have you had the humour by pass operation, i wonder, but being serious go hug a tree, youre spending far too much time in the urbanparanoia..

big eejit said:Is this sort of thing (buggering about with colour etc) frowned upon by proper photographers? It just makes this photo work better for me, but I get the impression it's not 'the done thing'.

big eejit said:Here's one I took in the local park yesterday. I desaturated the background to highlight the artist (Lucie Smailes) and her work.
Is this sort of thing (buggering about with colour etc) frowned upon by proper photographers? It just makes this photo work better for me, but I get the impression it's not 'the done thing'.
![]()
