Shippou-Sensei
4:1:2.5
ha!
Agreed to all of thatperplexis said:I reckon it's gonna be shite.
Such amazing potential, but there's no way that Weitz is going to be able to produce anything that has any kind of gravitas or that can do justice to the depth and intricate storytelling of the book.
It'll be a CGI-filled stripped-down wash-out.
I'd love to be wrong though.

What, the book, or interest?Thora said:I got halfway through the third book then lost it![]()

Have you still not read it all then? I'd have gone straight out and got another copy - couldn't stop halfway through!Thora said:The actual book![]()
bazzaBazza said:Soj, don't want to ruin your excitement BUT, apparently, all religious connotations will be omitted from the film series.
I don't see how they'll get round that....well, maybe some special effects.

I'm really excited cos I really hope it will be ace - but I do fear it will be a horrible abortion of the story...a story which is one of the best I have ever read, and with a vast amount of references to many subversive ideasBazza said:Done.![]()
I have more comments now but I will leave them for now (for fear of looking more silly)
HmmmBazza said:Why the flip aren't they making the rest of the trilogy.
The Subtle Knife was my favourite...Will was a good character and I loved the way they moved from world to world.
When the money rolls in, I expect they will.
(I got the impression that they wouldn't make more films from the post you directed me too)
sojourner said:Hmmm
Dunno - perhaps it is a money making exercise...do the sequel when this one sells a million. Maybe it's cos the director can't manipulate the next 2 stories in quite the same way as it's possible to do with the first? The deeper and heavier ideas are unavoidable in TSK and TAS
Bazza said:I wish I saw the theatre adaption in London. Used puppets and was meant to be superb.
Someone I went to school with played Will in that and was apparently absolutely incredible (Dominic Cooper, fact fans).Nahhh, I might like me weed, but I'm not easily impressed by visuals - the cerebral gets my vote every time!Bazza said:We're both weed smokers though! We'll probably be swept away by the visuals...
I just watched the trailer. Bland bollocks.May Kasahara said:...
I especially wish I'd managed to see that because I know that there is no way this film will even remotely touch the greatness of the books, and yet I'll probably see it anyway. Having seen the official teaser, it just looks like another CGI-splattered blockbuster, with effects straight from the house of blah.
I think that was what it was called in the American release of the bookperplexis said:Oh yeah, and WTF???is with it being called The Golden Compass?
What was wrong with Northern Lights, FFS!
Yeah, that figures.sojourner said:I think that was what it was called in the American release of the book
Yeh, it's the alethiometerperplexis said:Yeah, that figures.
But why, dammit, why?
Does US English not have "Northern Lights"? Does it mean some dubious sexual act? Is it racist? Is it the name of something else entirely and it infringed copyrights?
Wikipedia says it's because the alethiometer resembles a compass in the picture on the cover. That is truly lame!

Idaho said:Why do people want books made into films? Why are films considered the apex form of any art? So that all other media must naturally aspire to being squashed into a 2 hour film that will sell to US audiences?
Rubbish I say.
read the first book - thought it was alright.
Then you've obviously read so little as to miss some of the massive influences in there, Blake, Milton etcReno said:I thought it was just another overhyped kids book.
sojourner said:Then you've obviously read so little as to miss some of the massive influences in there, Blake, Milton etc
It's the way he weaves their ideas and characters from their writings that bestows the greatness. I was constantly surprised by tons of references that just were seemingly snuck into the text, no fanfare or owt. The writing itself was massively clever, and could be read on all levels. My daughter read them first, and at that age didn't pick up on any of that stuff...she's rereading them now at the age of 16 (along with Paradise Lost) and is starting to be pleasantly startled by what she's picking up onReno said:Why would being influenced by Blake and Milton automatically bestow greatness on Philip Pullman. I agree with what he has to say and think it's good reading for children, but as an adult I didn't find His Dark Materials that challenging or interesting. It's a step up from Harry Potter, but I don't get this craze for adults reading childrens literature.