Biddlybee
making knots with sticks
Wasn't it his gun and the money? (I should stop - I haven't seen the film)Swarfega said:I thought it was his gun in the bag?
![]()
Wasn't it his gun and the money? (I should stop - I haven't seen the film)Swarfega said:I thought it was his gun in the bag?
![]()
Orang Utan said:Its whereabouts is unimportant once Llwellyn'd dead and the Mexicans have fled. Chigurh doesn't care about it.

Swarfega said:Then one would wonder what his original motivation was - surely it was the retrieval of the money.
His relentless pursuit would have been meaningless according to his implied - and twisted - personal code/philosophy if he did not end up with the cash????
![]()
Swarfega said:Then one would wonder what his original motivation was - surely it was the retrieval of the money.
Swarfega said:His relentless pursuit would have been meaningless according to his implied - and twisted - personal code/philosophy if he did not end up with the cash????

El Jefe said:NOOOOOOOOOOOO
that's exactly not the case. His whole code is based on the notion that once you set something in motion, you can't change it. He and Wells collided, he made a commitment to Wells - if you don't do this, I will kill you and your wife, rather than just you. It's not about the money. The money is the least important thing in his code./

Swarfega said:I understand about the whole inevitability aspect but I still reckon that there has to be a specific goal, otherwise his inexorability becomes, directionless, infinite and thus pointless...?
El Jefe said:His goal was to get the money. In the course of trying to get the money, he made Wells a deal: give me the money and i'll kill you but i won't kill your wife. Don't give me the money and I will. At that point, the deal between him and Wells has its own momentum

Swarfega said:I understand about the whole inevitability aspect but I still reckon that there has to be a specific goal, otherwise his inexorability becomes, directionless, infinite and thus pointless...?
don't. there is no sense to be made from that film, no matter how you look at itSwarfega said:I think I shall watch Norbit tonight.
![]()


Orang Utan said:Wow! It's been nominated for 8 Oscars!

London_Calling said:I’m surprised at the preoccupation with where the money ended up – does it inform the themes of the piece in a way I’m not understanding?
London_Calling said:Fwiw, it seemed pretty clear to me the Terminator got the bag – the clue, as stated, is the coin by the duct and him throwing $100 bills at the kids after the accident (what other point was there for the accident scene) – and either he kept it or he did a deal in the room there and then with TLJ, no other possibilities.
London_Calling said:Fwiw, it seemed pretty clear to me the Terminator got the bag – the clue, as stated, is the coin by the duct and him throwing $100 bills at the kids after the accident (what other point was there for the accident scene) – and either he kept it or he did a deal in the room there and then with TLJ, no other possibilities.
Orang Utan said:Proof that IMDb is peopled by divs:
http://us.vdc.imdb.com/title/tt0477348/usercomments?filter=chrono;start=0
London_Calling said:Where was he hiding – in the shadows outside, behind the door, but certainly somewhere where he needed to hide from TLJ – which was odd anyway as he wasn’t the kind of character to hide at any point. Point: A deal could have been struck
London_Calling said:Where was he hiding – in the shadows outside, behind the door, but certainly somewhere where he needed to hide from TLJ – which was odd anyway as he wasn’t the kind of character to hide at any point. Point: A deal could have been struck
Nothing needed underlining, it was a pretty spare piece. After the preceeding 2 hours it’s hardly a point that needs underlining anyway – he is Mr Terminator or the Borg.
Don't understand wha t you're saying about the coin - it was a clue right?