exosculate
a stagger with a beat
Wankers - If I was closer I would be there.
Would be good to get as many people out as possible if they are close enough.
Would be good to get as many people out as possible if they are close enough.
NF attack on Manchester Pride-please help
- Thread starter rosa
- Start date
Bushell never wrote for Bulldog.
There are no 'nazi' friendly pubs, every time either the NF,WNP or BNP have met in a pub they have never been booked again.
Bulldog had nothing to do with City supporters.You will find that you had both Man Utd and Man City supporters amongst both the fash and the antifash in the 70s,80s and early 90s.
Yes I expect some people who get in the back of some cabs and drink in some pubs have some racist views .
Have you ever actually come across any of the fash locally??
There are no 'nazi' friendly pubs, every time either the NF,WNP or BNP have met in a pub they have never been booked again.
Bulldog had nothing to do with City supporters.You will find that you had both Man Utd and Man City supporters amongst both the fash and the antifash in the 70s,80s and early 90s.
Yes I expect some people who get in the back of some cabs and drink in some pubs have some racist views .
Have you ever actually come across any of the fash locally??
Questioned by who? The landlady?taffboy gwyrdd said:
As for Bushell, are you confusing Bulldog with Socialist Worker, or Sniffin Glue?
http://www.garry-bushell.co.uk/BIOGRAPHY/INDEX.ASP
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
LLETSA said:
good boy
Heigh-ho Silver!
1980-91 (ish) was the period during which I was active on the left. Like most people, I was involved in lots of different activities, but whenever the issue of fascism came to the fore then anti-fascism became a priority.
But I see you're on your high horse (once more) because of what I say in this thread. And you are right if you suspect that I would not have been there. Why? Because, first and foremost, the NF are, these days, a joke organisation; the main threat it represents seems to be, if recent happenings are anything to go by, to the people that get involved in it. What they actually say and do doesn't matter all that much. Secondly, these kind of activities are only of any relevance to the participants: the NF can stand behind their police guardians and grimace and gurn self-righteously, and hypocritically, about moral degeneration, while the UAF crowd can bleat at them through megaphones from behind their own police guardians. Meanwhile, the bemused shoppers will mostly wonder what the bleedin' 'ell it's all about. As for the 'threatened' gay community, I doubt that, in the tens of thousands in which they participate in the Manchester event every August, they would have been all that intimidated by a dozen or two socially inadequate boneheads.
As it happens, Mrs LLETSA and I were in Manchester on Saturday. However, the UAF demo was off our list of priorities, as she went off to visit my old mam and I went to watch City march on towards Champions League glory, joining her and some old mates for a drink later before getting the train home.
I notice that you, MC5, are in the vanguard of those who are keenest on demanding to know an individual poster's level of activity-as if what they say in their posts is dependent in any way on what they actually do. You ought to remember that this is simply a forum for debate, where all that matters is what a poster says, nothing else. And whereas certain posters can be interesting when they relate anecdotes about their political activities, these carry most power when they are there to reinforce political points, and then only when they make it clear that the poster must indisputably have been present at the event to which they refer. You, however, are among those whose references to their own activities are only ever in the vaguest terms-and completely unverifiable.
MC5 said:
1980-91 (ish) was the period during which I was active on the left. Like most people, I was involved in lots of different activities, but whenever the issue of fascism came to the fore then anti-fascism became a priority.
But I see you're on your high horse (once more) because of what I say in this thread. And you are right if you suspect that I would not have been there. Why? Because, first and foremost, the NF are, these days, a joke organisation; the main threat it represents seems to be, if recent happenings are anything to go by, to the people that get involved in it. What they actually say and do doesn't matter all that much. Secondly, these kind of activities are only of any relevance to the participants: the NF can stand behind their police guardians and grimace and gurn self-righteously, and hypocritically, about moral degeneration, while the UAF crowd can bleat at them through megaphones from behind their own police guardians. Meanwhile, the bemused shoppers will mostly wonder what the bleedin' 'ell it's all about. As for the 'threatened' gay community, I doubt that, in the tens of thousands in which they participate in the Manchester event every August, they would have been all that intimidated by a dozen or two socially inadequate boneheads.
As it happens, Mrs LLETSA and I were in Manchester on Saturday. However, the UAF demo was off our list of priorities, as she went off to visit my old mam and I went to watch City march on towards Champions League glory, joining her and some old mates for a drink later before getting the train home.
I notice that you, MC5, are in the vanguard of those who are keenest on demanding to know an individual poster's level of activity-as if what they say in their posts is dependent in any way on what they actually do. You ought to remember that this is simply a forum for debate, where all that matters is what a poster says, nothing else. And whereas certain posters can be interesting when they relate anecdotes about their political activities, these carry most power when they are there to reinforce political points, and then only when they make it clear that the poster must indisputably have been present at the event to which they refer. You, however, are among those whose references to their own activities are only ever in the vaguest terms-and completely unverifiable.
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
LLETSA said:
You are a prize prick!
Taxamo Welf
kebagels pls
exosculate said:
in what way? whats wrong with that particular paragraph?
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
LLETSA said:
You are not worth responding to.
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
exosculate said:
Its one thing to think its an irrelevance to turn up at something like this. To go out of your way to say how one knows so much better than everybody else with a smug, pompous, patronising and superior I know better because I'm so much cleverer than you type approach is utter condescending bollocks.
past caring
The Cathars were right
Except none of that was contained in the post, was it?
LLETSA said:
Actually LLETSA for once i am in agreement with you regarding anti fash cativity being a pantomine
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
Herbert Read said:
Oh no I'm not.
exosculate said:
But you did respond. With a load of old nothing, maybe, but it was a response.
If you have nothing to say to me, how about enlightening us with your own opinions? Or do you prefer to indiscriminately cheer on every Trot routine in the name of anti-fascism, regardless of their effectiveness?
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
LLETSA said:
I responded to myself, for the benefit of others, with a whole lot of something about your unbearable superiority complex. I don't cheer on any 'group' I believe countering fash demos is valid. I believe you to be clueless. Probably right wing too.
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
hibee said:
Who the fuck are you?
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
LLETSA said:
Why don't you go shopping with the Mrs you cretin!
exosculate
a stagger with a beat
LLETSA said:
More pompousity. Keep going.
Similar threads
