I saw the thread title and thought 'which road are they going to build it under'
Orang Utan said:Pret sell rank food dressed up as quality gourmet fare. I buy sarnies from Joes on Horseferry Road it's independent, cheap, generous with fillings and they make the tastiest sandwiches in London.
Dub:
giving a fuck about what you eat isn't snobbery.
Dub:
[a] sandwich from a local café with decent ingredients
I can only use my own judgement and that is what it tells me!Pie 1 said:Oh come on! You may not like them, but it's rather ludicrous to claim that Pret have "rank food" in their snadwiches.

Pie 1 said:What? so Joes/Pheonix/etc source all there stuff from a bloody farmer's market do they?
Why don't you ask them exactly where their wholeseller gets it from next time you're in there.
IntoStella said:The quality of the bread and the meat in the Phoenix is very high and IIRC, neither come via wholesalers but direct from the supplier.
. top_biller said:Anyone been to the Carribbean take away near the top of Dulwich road? Will it serve as a good replacement for Judy's Divine now I've moved??
Donna Ferentes said:

tarannau said:Which one do you mean? The juice bar (with the misspelled 'carribean') is pretty decent. And there's one nearby, by the Oirish pub, which does some great curry chicken dumplings - a nice alternative to roti..
And there are a few more around there IIRC, including the roti shop itself...
lang rabbie said:AFAIK Subway don't have any fryers or grills for hot food- which makes getting planning permission so much easier as they are within planning use class A1 "shops" - which includes " the sale of sandwiches or other cold food for consumption off the premises", as against A5 "hot food takeaways".
William of Walworth said:From page one, becaue I don't have time to read this all properly now, but Subway have since early November been even more my SWORN ENEMY than before.
Because they took over the former Famous Walworth Road Cafe (SE17's best and most well known greasy spoon) after the owners retired 27 years on from opening it (or after taking it over??), and turned it into a horrible McShop.
People could have kept it as a cafe without any special planning permission!!!![]()
No doubt cafe to 'shop' of the Subway kind requires no change of use application ...
phildwyer said:Subways are excellent ıf you ask me. The trıck ıs to have the low-fat ones, they,re actually %very% healthy. In the US they had an ad campaıgn featurıng a guy whod lost 30 stone by only eatıng subway. he was referenced on the Sımpsons as ,the guy who used to be fat but ıs now just ugly.,
*Individuals lost weight by exercising and eating a balanced, reduced-calorie diet that included SUBWAY® sandwiches with 6 grams of fat or less. Their results are not typical. Your loss, if any, will vary. The SUBWAY® chain does not endorse the diet Jared created and cautions anyone embarking on a weight-loss plan to consult their physician.
Mr Retro said:Who are these "people"? Was there actually anybody besides Subway in line to take it over?
pootle said:And Subway hardly bullied the owners of the Walworth Road caff out of the place, did they?
I remember reading a few articles about the caff closing in the South London press and I thought the place was closing because the owners had been working in the place for over 20yrs, and wanted to retire, and that as their kids didn't want to take over the place, so decided to shut up shop rather than let someone else trade under the "Famous Walworth Road Cafe" brand.
Nothing to do with *gasp* the evil march of globalisation then!

William of Walworth said:I don't know who the landlords were/are, but I suspect that Subway made them a higher-rent-than-anyone-else-could-possibly-afford offer that they couldn't refuse. If there WERE any other potential 'people', I suspect they'd have been squeezed out and never got a look in.
William of Walworth said:I didn't suggest that they did.
WoW said:Because they took over the former Famous Walworth Road Cafe (SE17's best and most well known greasy spoon) after the owners retired 27 years on from opening it (or after taking it over??), and turned it into a horrible McShop.
William of Walworth said:Sorry that was misleading. No there weren't, as far as I know, any other potential new managers/owners.
I don't know who the landlords were/are, but I suspect that Subway made them a higher-rent-than-anyone-else-could-possibly-afford offer that they couldn't refuse. If there WERE any other potential 'people', I suspect they'd have been squeezed out and never got a look in.
You approve of that?