rogue yam said:As it is, I am tired of providing free research services to lying crapweasels.
Well then, remove youself from this forum.
rogue yam said:As it is, I am tired of providing free research services to lying crapweasels.
rogue yam said:They did not get away with it. They were informed upon by their fellow soldiers. The proper authorities immediately removed the suspected abusers from their units, arrested them, and charged them with serious crimes. They were subsequently tried and convicted. Now all are serving hard time in U.S. federal prison. These facts are known to all. Anyone who says that the abusers "got away with it" is either a moron or a liar.
rogue yam said:No it's false, as can easily be proven. Thus there is nothing to "face up to". Here's a proposal: I will spend the five minutes or so that it would take to demonstrate to any reasonable person that what you say is false, and then come back and post the relevant link(s), if you promise in advance that when I do you will post to this thread a personal apology to me, by name, for your being a lazy, dishonest fuckwit. We can set a reasonable time limit, and if I fail to prove you wrong within that time, I will be the one to apologize. As it is, I am tired of providing free research services to lying crapweasels.
I don't think so, the leaks happened during the initial investigation, the soldiers weren't arrested until it had concluded - I think you owe me an apology, lets have it shit-for-brains.rogue yam said:No it's false, as can easily be proven. Thus there is nothing to "face up to". Here's a proposal: I will spend the five minutes or so that it would take to demonstrate to any reasonable person that what you say is false, and then come back and post the relevant link(s), if you promise in advance that when I do you will post to this thread a personal apology to me, by name, for your being a lazy, dishonest fuckwit. We can set a reasonable time limit, and if I fail to prove you wrong within that time, I will be the one to apologize. As it is, I am tired of providing free research services to lying crapweasels.
You flatter u75.nino_savatte said:Are you being paid to do this, yammie?
You can't read.sleaterkinney said:I don't think so, the leaks happened during the initial investigation, the soldiers weren't arrested until it had concluded - I think you owe me an apology, lets have it shit-for-brains.
Bernie Gunther said:I think legalistic arguments are sort of beside the point here. The damage to the US has occurred at a propaganda, rather than a legal level. Calling people names and quibbling using freeper talking points doesn't affect that positively.
It doesn't matter that yammie and other deluded bushbots think everything is fine. What matters is that the US is widely perceived to use political torture, extraordinary renditions to permit torture, kidnappings and so on, as policy. Scapegoating a few degenerate rednecks who were dumb enough to take pictures of themselves doing that stuff is not going to change this.
Once you have a worldwide reputation for doing this kind of stuff, it's likely to be all too easy for your enemies to claim that attacking you, for example through terrorism, is morally justified and so gain an improved chance of convincing some more hot-heads to sign up for a terrorist jihad.
rogue yam said:You flatter u75.
rogue yam said:You can't read.
U75 stats for January 2006:rogue yam said:You flatter u75.
rogue yam said:You can't read.
C'mon then, show us your proof or STFU.rogue yam said:The abusers were arrested and charged well before the photos were leaked. This is established fact.
rogue yam said:u75's most tiresome meme makes its appearance right on schedule...
How many have been tried and convicted?rogue yam said:They did not get away with it. They were informed upon by their fellow soldiers. The proper authorities immediately removed the suspected abusers from their units, arrested them, and charged them with serious crimes. They were subsequently tried and convicted. Now all are serving hard time in U.S. federal prison. These facts are known to all. Anyone who says that the abusers "got away with it" is either a moron or a liar.
dylanredefined said:As much as the thought of a general being tortured to death by the other ranks it really should be by the soldiers of the same army imho .
Espically as supposedly some iraq genrals took cia bribes to put their men in the open for american guns .Are these new photos of a new crime or old photos just released.
rogue yam said:u75's most tiresome meme makes its appearance right on schedule...
Pretty much yes. For example, it might be argued that after Abu Ghraib, the chances of any US approved government ever being seen as legitimate by Iraqis fell to something pretty close to zero.KeyboardJockey said:<snip> Like how bloody sunday helped increase support for the provos.
Yuwipi Woman said:Pot
Kettle
Black![]()
It was never proven in a court of law, because it was never tried as far as I know, but what appears to have happened is that US military/spook interrogators seem to have encouraged the dengerate redneck prison guards who were busted to 'soften up' their prisoners as part of the standard procedure.dylanredefined said:Well hopefully abu ghraib is slightly better now .Was it ever proved that the
gits who did this were obeying orders or just doing the torture because they could? Either way their officers should have been in the dock ,but,I think most of them got off with nothing more than career black marks .
If the US had any guts should have let the Un or the iraqes try them .
Though the iraq authorties would probably discpline them for poor practicise.
sourceOver the last year, prisoners released from Guantanamo Bay have alleged they too were subjected to brutal and humiliating detention conditions and interrogations. Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the former Guantanamo commander recently sent to oversee Iraqi detention facilities, wrote in a report last fall (based apparently on his Guantanamo experiences) that military guards in Iraq should be "enablers for interrogations," actively "engaged in setting the conditions for successful exploitation of the internees." When pressed on how conditions at Abu Ghraib prison would be reformed to prevent further abuses, Miller told reporters, "Trust us. We are doing this right."
sourceThe US commander at the centre of the Iraqi prisoner scandal says she was told to treat detainees like dogs.
Brig Gen Janis Karpinski told the BBC she was being made a "convenient scapegoat" for abuse ordered by others.
Top US commander for Iraq, Gen Ricardo Sanchez, should be asked what he knew about the abuse, she told BBC Radio 4's On The Ropes programme. . . .
Gen Karpinski said more damaging information was likely to emerge at those trials.
Gen Karpinski was in charge of the military police unit that ran Abu Ghraib and other prisons when the abuses were committed. She has been suspended but not charged. . . .
Gen Karpinski said military intelligence took over part of the Abu Ghraib jail to "Gitmoize" their interrogations - make them more like what was happening in the US detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which is nicknamed "Gitmo".
She said current Iraqi prisons chief Maj Gen Geoffrey Miller - who was in charge at Guantanamo Bay - visited her in Baghdad and said: "At Guantanamo Bay we learned that the prisoners have to earn every single thing that they have."
"He said they are like dogs and if you allow them to believe at any point that they are more than a dog then you've lost control of them."
Gen Karpinski repeated that she knew nothing of the humiliation and torture of Iraq prisoners that was going on inside Abu Ghraib - she was made a scapegoat.

First where's my promise, dimwit?sleaterkinney said:C'mon then, show us your proof or STFU.