nino_savatte
No pasaran!
sihhi said:I don't know whether it's all accurate but there's some info about cultural and historical battles here: http://www.tomandrodna.com/notonthepalouse/
and here: http://templeofdemocracy.com/resume.htm
What are the class dynamics behind Neo-confederacy/independence for the South?
Ah, Temple of Democracy and Edward Sebesta..c'est bon. From what I've seen the movement is led by mainly middle class types. It is led from the top, like so many other so-called grassroots movements in the US. Insofar as this being a class war, there is no indication of this: there is simply a desire on the part of neo-confederalists to secede from the Union and re-establish the Confederacy. There doesn't even seem to be an truly economic argument for this either: it is based primarily upon an emotional attachment to a legend.
From your link
Tracing the theological war thesis from its origins to the turn of the twenty-first century, we show how the belief that the Confederacy was an orthodox Christian nation has gained increasing circulation and acceptance. Once a marginal revisionist reading of the Civil War, we contend that groups as diverse as the Sons of Confederate Veterans heritage organization, Christian Reconstructionist bodies such as the Chalcedon Foundation, and the League of the South now generally accept the theological war thesis. Reaching a broad audience at conferences, through publications and on web sites, one of the League’s founding directors, Steven Wilkins, continues to develop theological interpretations of the Civil War. Operating within this historical trajectory, therefore, the League of the South has utilized the theological war thesis to promote a Christian nationalist commitment to constructing a new Confederate States of America.
It is often portrayed as many things but mainly the Civil War has been latterly seen as a struggle between Celts and Anglo-Saxons and Presbyterianism versus Episcopalianism. One wonders what else they'll claim it is.
