Meltingpot
Living in our pools we soon forget about the sea
post deleted
Except that the "inherent privilege" is powerless, widely supported, and not based on racial purity.
say that to the princess killed for being pregnant to a muslim!
Supposedly they changed that phrase in their constitution:Mr Griffin does pretend to be far more moderate than he is, and is acting a lot smarter than the boot-boy impression he gave in the 1997 clips. But his recent distinction between "legal citizenship" and "racial citizenship", and that well-hidden clause in the BNP's manifesto about kindred European stock, show beyond doubt that it's all window dressing.
Though a quick google shows that the phrase is still used:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article400379.ece
At the same time the BNP has, following legal advice, changed its constitution to remove the bar on membership to people who were not “British or closely kindred European stock”. The new criteria states that membership is open to “indigenous folk community strands of our nation” such as Celtics, Anglo-Saxon, Norse and such like, “plus those fully integrated descendants of other European people who settled here so long ago that we feel comfortable that they are now effectively part of ‘us’”.
http://bnp.org[REMOVE THIS BIT TO MAKE THE LINK WORK].uk/how-to-help/if-you-live-overseas/
All ex-pat ‘Brits’ and those of closely kindred European stock are welcome as members wherever you live in the world.
...there can be no platform for Nazis.
The Times say the BNP changing it because Trevor Phillips is threatening legal action. But it just makes the BNP look more moderate, which is surely counter-productive in the extreme.Supposedly they changed that phrase in their constitution:
Though a quick google shows that the phrase is still used:
A lot of it seems to come from official multicultural discourse, the politics of fighting racism by providing racial "communities" with representatives, usually from among the more privileged sections of those communities, which feeds quite nicely into the BNP's idea of representing Britain's "indigenous folk".The Times say the BNP changing it because Trevor Phillips is threatening legal action. But it just makes the BNP look more moderate, which is surely counter-productive in the extreme.
Although if they do stick with "indigenous folk community strands of our nation" it's clear what they're about. Where do they come up with this nonsense? Their creepy euphemisms are even more disturbing than out-and-out racialism.
Yep. Those are just two of the conservative arguments they've taken and caricatured.don't think the bnp should be banned thats never a good road.
mind you they desreve more publicity assullt rifles for everybody.
the plan to unite southern ireland with the uk.
comedy gold there stark staring mad
ignore the racism and they are insane
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/stand...een+hosts+BNP+chiefs+at+the+Palace/article.do
It looks like we will all be storming the palace in July. Just heard that the fuhrer of the BNP Nick Griffin & London Leader Richard Barnbrook will be attending a garden party at the Palace. While he might be able to swap racist jokes with Prince Phillip and probably shares a passion for dressing in Nazi uniforms with the younger son, this is bad news.
The Green Party comment is pretty fucking poor, Darren Johnson:
"It's their garden party and they can invite who they want. He is a member of the Assembly after all and it is essentially a political problem"
Griffin is a Nazi, there can be no platform for Nazis. The Greens shouldn't be saying 'he's a member of the Assembly afterall' they should be saying that he is a Nazi scumbag and issuing a call-to-arms to storm the palace!
We must resist any attempt to 'normalise' facists and nazis on the political scene.

get off your internet then come to London and create a plotical alternative in places like Barking and Dagenham that takes away there votes thenThey should not be a legitimate political party, they're a bunch of holocaust denying nazi cunts.
bit of a side issue but Lenin explicitily opposed 'democracy' as being an institution that only exists to service a class society .. so technically you are wrongNo, the SWP & the revolutionary left want to extend democracy, by replacing the market and bosses with workers democracy - crucial difference.
Under socialism, your workplace would be run democratically, under fascism society would become a barracks.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/stand...een+hosts+BNP+chiefs+at+the+Palace/article.do
It looks like we will all be storming the palace in July. Just heard that the fuhrer of the BNP Nick Griffin & London Leader Richard Barnbrook will be attending a garden party at the Palace. While he might be able to swap racist jokes with Prince Phillip and probably shares a passion for dressing in Nazi uniforms with the younger son, this is bad news.
The Green Party comment is pretty fucking poor, Darren Johnson:
"It's their garden party and they can invite who they want. He is a member of the Assembly after all and it is essentially a political problem"
Griffin is a Nazi, there can be no platform for Nazis. The Greens shouldn't be saying 'he's a member of the Assembly afterall' they should be saying that he is a Nazi scumbag and issuing a call-to-arms to storm the palace!
We must resist any attempt to 'normalise' facists and nazis on the political scene.
Originally posted by Udo -
"The Greens........... should be........issuing a call-to-arms to storm the palace!


bit of a side issue but Lenin explicitily opposed 'democracy' as being an institution that only exists to service a class society .. so technically you are wrong
We must resist any attempt to 'normalise' facists and nazis on the political scene.
Defend the queen from the NAZI!
Defend Oxford University from the NAZI!
Is this the sort of pro-status quo anti-fascsim we've got today. (Plus, he he aren't the BNP thick and that).

Is this the best you can do Butchers?
I know that clever trendy fools don't like the BNP being called Nazis.
Yes, fascism, NOT Nazism. The two ARE NOT synonymous, except perhaps in the minds of fools.One recalls the 1930s with the Daily Mail and various aristocrats hobnobbing with the fascists. I don't care less about the Queen (indeed I'm against her) the point is that the BNP crave respectability and to get into the mainstream & bond with the establishment, as part of building a mass movement for fascism.
Do you think that shouting "Nazi" does anything worth a damn in actually stopping the BNP either spreading their message or in shifting the political discourse in the UK toward acceptance of their message as "mainstream"? I don't. It hasn't worked for at least the last ten years, as I'm sure you well know.The BNP would love to be able to organise on campuses across Britain and to be able to have meetings in town centres & do stalls to build a mass fascist organisation in Britain, the reason they can't is because anti-fascists have organised.
There is nothing pro-status quo about it.
Storming the palace?Not really, I saw storming the palace as an opportunity to kill two birds in one stone, uniting anti-fash and anti-monarchists in one monster mobilisation.

Perhaps he's not being cleverer-than-thou, perhaps he simply sees beyond the constraints you party people impose on yourselves.You should stop trying to be cleverer-than-thou and maybe make more constructive suggestions about action. But praxis was never your strong point, eh?
Not since the Great War. Given that the Queen served in the ATS during the Second World War, I doubt she'll be overcome with friendship to Mr Griffin if he does admire National Socialism.

What are you actually suggesting people should do?
Louis MacNeice

We'll have to live with it until voters get the message: whatever the problem the BNP is not the answer
An amazing quote on this from Michael White, one of the Guardians chief political writers, that just perfectly sums up the contempt that the political class feel about the electorate: